• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree with the view that is was primarily the existence of contrasting economic systems that prevented the relaxation of superpower tensions in the period 1945-85?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far do you agree with the view that is was primarily the existence of contrasting economic systems that prevented the relaxation of superpower tensions in the period 1945-85? Emerging from the Second World War were two superpowers with contrasting economic systems. The USA and USSR soon became embroiled in a power struggle across the globe, which was to last until the 1980's. Arguably it was the inherent nature of the contrasting economic systems which prevented a relaxation of superpower tension in the period 1945-85. Tensions began, following the inter-war alliance in Europe, with US recognition that it needed to stabilize its economy as source 1 suggests. Truman believed that Western Europe, as its largest exporter of goods, had to be in a viable position economically, if the US economy was to flourish. As the United States News put it at the time 'if buying power is exhausted, world markets for US goods would disappear'. Marshall Aid was provided to prevent a collapse abroad, ensuring the future of the US economy for the long term. To secure markets in Europe it was also necessary to ensure nations remained capitalist with open markets. Communism under its command economy would shackle the ability of the US to trade, so it was imperative that the US did all it could to keep the Western European markets open. ...read more.

Middle

Certain actions by the Soviets led the USA to believe that as source 2 suggest, the Soviet Union were intent 'on destroying' capitalism in their struggle for communist dominance across the world. The support of Communist regimes in Asia, the Middle East and Cuba was suggestive of the USSR's intention to promote what source 3 describes as 'the path from capitalism to socialism'. However, following Stalin's death the USSR moved towards 'peaceful coexistence' believing in the inevitable collapse of capitalism. This suggests that from the Soviet point of view, contrasting economic systems did not prevent the relaxation of super power tensions in the period 1945-85. The Berlin 'problem' is further evidence of the problems competing economic systems caused between the superpowers. Stalin's initial attempt to remove the West via the blockade of 1948, was based upon his fear of a new capitalist West German state being set up. Khrushchev's later decision to provide the West with an ultimatum in 1961, highlights how keen the USSR was to remove the West from Berlin. As source 5 shows, Khrushchev had to do something to 'control the movement between East and West Berlin'. The attraction of capitalism, inside the Communist state of East Germany, was threatening the existence of Communism, with people crossing the border in their hundreds. ...read more.

Conclusion

Although both communist states, Sino-Soviet relations had soured so much that fighting persisted along their shared borders. This split in itself is recognition that superpower tension was not only built upon contrasting economic systems. However, the tripartite order that then existed allowed for an improvement in relations between the USA and both China and the USSR during d�tente. The split allowed the USA to play off one communist superpower against the other as none could afford to alienate the USA so much that they formed an alliance with the other. In conclusion, the two contrasting economic systems alone do not cause such conflict between two nations. It was more the global nature of their politics which necessitated the advancement of their economic models across the globe which undoubtedly led to tension. The USA's need to secure world markets, was in direct opposition to Soviet insistence upon a sphere of influence in order to secure itself against further land invasion. The failure to communicate or to understand each others position is the main reason which prevented the relaxation of superpower tension in the period 1945-85. However, it is certainly true to say that to some extent the existence of contrasting economic systems prevented such a relaxation in tension. The emergence of China as a 3rd world player, and a move towards d�tente actually demonstrated that superpower tensions were relaxed at times, although not to a degree whereby you could suggest that the tensions no longer existed. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Free essay

    The development of the international economy in the period 1945-2000 favoured rich countries at ...

    4 star(s)

    Yet, the lack of this stability contributed to by the DCs only served to advantage themselves through worldwide inflationary pressures2. Another global development that favoured the DCs was their various backdoor agreements amongst only the richer countries to protect their economies against the policies that the economic institutions enforced which were detrimental to them.

  2. The Korean War and Superpower relations

    Hence, the Chinese decided to intervene in the conflict and China made a massive military effort in the conflict, deploying 2.3 million troops and suffering over 360,000 casualties. The involvement in China in the conflict was significant as it widened the scope of the Cold War, introducing the entry of China as a new participant to the conflict.

  1. Why Was Germany At The Centre of Cold War Tensions 1945 - 1961

    Although it was never stated this was to combat communism the East viewed it with distain and forbade all of their satellite states from asking for it. This had important consequences for Germany. As the East forbade their section from taking Marshal Aid it was only the West that received Marshal Aid.

  2. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    * Many mines and other booby traps were left after the war. * People continued to suffer from the effects of chemicals and defoliants. The consequences of the war for the USA * The war cost $120,000,000,000 and was a tremendous blow to American prestige.

  1. How True is it to say that the period 1953-1962 saw a relaxation of ...

    The Korean War began in 1950, and for three years there was the constant possibility of the conflict being taken one stage further as MacArthur threatened to use nuclear weapons against China. Set against this backdrop, it could definitely be said that there was a relaxation of the cold war

  2. How far did peaceful coexistence ease Cold War tensions between the Soviet Union and ...

    Nagy introduced moderate reforms that were part of his ?New Course?, and under popular pressure also moved to withdraw Hungary from the Warsaw Pact. This proved to be the final straw for the Soviets. Over a hundred thousand Soviet soldiers marched into Hungary to stop the demonstrators, and restore peace.

  1. How far did peaceful coexistence ease Cold War tensions between the Soviet Union and ...

    The Geneva Summit of 1955 was attended by Eisenhower and Khrushchev were the new found ?Geneva Spirit? led to Khrushchev prepared to allow a united Germany providing it was neutral but only if NATO and the Warsaw Pact were dismantled which the West was not willing to agree on.

  2. In the context of the period 1905-2005, how far do you agree that Khrushchev ...

    The constant shrift between restricted and relaxed censorship was a long-term problem persistent throughout Russian history. Previous attempts of totalitarian rule had proved to be of little benefit to the state; in certain instances it furthered dissidents towards the government by the populace.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work