• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree with the view that the origins of the Cold War in 1945-46 owed much to ideological differences and little to personalities?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far do you agree with the view that the origins of the cold war in 1945-46 owed much to the ideological differences and little to personalities? The origins of the Cold War were based on the legacy of World War Two, as the defeat of Nazi Germany and the economic devastation of Europe had created a power vacuum. America and Russia's conflicting ideologies resulted in them being unable to agree how to fill it: Roosevelt's solution was based upon the principles of Wilsonian Liberalism, which involved using US influence to bring peace, democracy and international co-operation while the USSR, having been invaded three times during the course of the twentieth century and lost an unprecedented 20 million citizens during World War Two, sought to protect their borders by creating a 'buffer zone' in Eastern Europe. The US misinterpreted their need for security as attempting to spread Communism, which had actually not been a Foreign Policy aim since 1921, and gain economic dominance over Europe. Inability to understand each other's aims and needs, such the false American belief that Stalin was a monolith, resulted in a war where the two sides did not come into direct armed conflict but attacked each other through propaganda, refusal to co-operate and economic competition. ...read more.

Middle

It demanded firmer action by the West and called for an alliance between Britain and America in order to prevent Soviet expansion. The speech had limited influence, however, as Attlee had replaced Churchill as Prime Minister. Attlee did share Churchill's views though and later thanked him as, despite being Socialist, he strongly disagreed with Stalin's policies and was suspicious of his motives. Foreign Secretary Ernest Bevin was also of the same opinion and made numerous attempts to convince the US of the threat Russian presented to Iran and Eastern Europe and secure further aid from them. Truman was present when the speech was delivered, which mirrored his own views and his Iron Fist approach. As well as confirming capitalist suspicions it received a furious response in Moscow and Stalin accused Churchill of being a 'warmonger', which both damaged US-Soviet relations and demonstrated the significance of personalities in the Cold War. The influence of these personalities resulted in US Foreign Policy being more assertive: it aimed to actively prevent the spread of Communism, which they termed 'containment'. This lead to relations deteriorating, as shown by the lack of co-operation during Potsdam Conference, which was held in July-August 1945 between Attlee, Truman and Stalin. While held in order to ease tension, it in fact did the opposite as Russia was only given 10% of all zones as part of the reparations agreements, despite making the heaviest sacrifices during the war. ...read more.

Conclusion

This was demonstrated by the American failure to recognise the Soviet's sphere of influence in their desire to create markets in Europe and Asia when they feared a post-war recession. During the World War America and Russia were obliged to co-operate, but once this was no longer the case both superpowers were drawn into a power vacuum as the economic devastation of Europe presented the opportunity to impose their ideology on a European, or even global, scale. This view is supported by Orthodox historian Arthur Schlesinger who states that 'The Cold War was at heart an ideological confrontation...Ideological tensions grew especially in the wake of World war Two and events in Europe'. Ideology was at the root of the Cold war, but the personalities of the leaders were a reflection of the countries they presided over and consequently did contribute towards an increase in tension, such as the US belief in the monolith which led them to unfairly blame Stalin for the Revolution in China. Furthermore, US-Soviet relations changed according to who was in power: Stalin and Roosevelt were able to compromise and co-operate (although many of his actions did provoke future conflict after his presidency) whereas Stalin and Truman were not. Therefore the origins of the Cold War owed most to the ideological differences of the two superpowers, but the role personalities was not insignificant. ?? ?? ?? ?? Page 1 of 3 Marilyn Wilkinson ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    How far do you agree that the Cold War broke out in Europe because ...

    4 star(s)

    a large scale."2 Referring to how the USA came up with the Marshall Plan to provide aid to European countries, it addressed economic needs in Western Europe as well as indirectly boosted its own economy by creating a captive market for American goods and also aided American businessmen in coping with the falling domestic demand of goods.

  2. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    * Khrushchev also gave the impression of being friendlier to the West o In 1955, an Austrian State Treaty ended Soviet occupation, and Khrushchev withdrew Soviet troops from Austria. o He believed in Peaceful Co-existence. Rather than try to destroy the West, the Soviet Union should accept that it had a right to exist.

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    * Hitler was also admired by some people for the way that he had rebuilt Germany after 1933. Unemployment was cut from 6,000,000 to 500,000 and industrial production rose dramatically. This was in comparison to events in Britain where the government seemed to be doing very little.

  2. How far was the USSR responsible for the outbreak of the Cold War?

    to support the local communists, the USA did back the anti-communists in the Greek Civil War's closing stages, thus showing its determination to maintain its influence in Europe. However, there is a post-revisionist middle ground between the two extremes, claiming that both superpowers share the blame for the outbreak of the Cold War between them.

  1. The Cold War was a big rivalry that developed after World War II.

    Flashback: July 1, 1946 from Washington Post July 25 - Test Baker - underwater explosion - Test Charlie postponed � "The Able-Baker-Where's-Charlie Follies" from the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, includes an excerpt from the 1994 book Operations Crossroads by Johnathan M.

  2. Assess the strategic strengths and weaknesses of America's 'containment of communism' policy since 1945.

    It is worth mentioning the whole doctrine, as Nixon puts it in his book titled, The Real War: "-Reverse the 'Americanization' of the war that had occurred from 1965 to 1968 and concentrate instead on Vietnamization. -Give more priority to pacification so that the South Vietnamese could be better able to extend their control over the countryside.

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    "Please get out the list and please, with my full authority, use a heavy hand," he told one assistant. "Act as a burr under the saddle and get things moving!" But even Roosevelt's personal involvement could not end the problems that kept developing around the lend-lease program.

  2. How far do you agree with the view that the origins of the Cold ...

    This was a cause of tension leading up to the Cold War as the wealthy businessmen of the West, most of which were in high powered governmental or political positions, saw nationalism as a direct threat towards their wealth, power and status, so was an attack on the power structure of US society.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work