• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree with the view that the Wall Street crash was responsible for the depression of the early 1930s?

Extracts from this document...


How far do you agree with the view that the Wall Street crash was responsible for the depression of the early 1930s? The Wall Street Crash was certainly a major factor in the depression of the early 1930s, as said in source 3, 'setting off a devastating economic collapse'. However, it was not the sole reason for the depression but only a segment. The economy was rotten well before the Crash in areas such as agriculture, industry and the banking system which had far more significant consequences. The Wall Street crash was certainly responsible, to a certain degree, for the economic downturn which brought USA to its knees through the 1930s. The frenzy of unregulated speculation which had fuelled the huge stock market bubble, with stock prices far outrunning economic growth, had burst. When panic selling began investor anxious to minimize losses sold as fast as possible. This quickened the fall in share prices. As stock values plummeted with industrial stock falling by 50 per cent between September and November 1929, 'business confidence evaporated'. ...read more.


As, incomes fell, farmers fell behind with mortgage repayments and loans used to invest in new equipment. This was critical as much of this business had been done with 'rural banks with limited capital'. Which were 'highly vulnerable to sudden large-scale withdrawals or runs'. Due to hardship on the agricultural economy which had a direct impact on the rural banks, 'almost 5000 collapsed between 1923 and 1930'. As stated in source 3, 'Farmers, badly off to begin with, entered a new era of adversity'. Though the adversity of farmers was an important in bringing about the banking crisis, it was only a trigger, there were much more fundamental flaws exposed by the depression. As stated in source 2, 'at the 1920s there were 30,000 independent banks in existence in the United States' which made the banking system fragile to the extreme. Unlike Great Britain, there had not been the consolidation of small banks into a few giants which could withstand an economic storm. Combined with the lack of federal regulation; were no federal deposits insurance system existed, the allowance of banks to make 'purely speculative loans' and hold 'limited capital' for security against shocks was an important element of the depression, and the severity of it. ...read more.


This is supported by source 3, which states, by the summer of 1932 imports and exports had dropped to only a third of 1929 levels. In essence the macroeconomic policies of Hoover, the president, and the republican administration were utter failures in stimulating the components of aggregate demand needed to combat the depression. Through its monetary policy of high interest rates, when low interest rates were need to encourage borrowing and spending; or its fiscal policy of rising taxes to pay for public spending, taking away money from consumers which needed to American goods for there to be growth. In conclusion the Wall Street Crash certainly contributed to the economic depression, but as D. McCoy said, 'it was more a trigger-one that was a symptom of deeper and more complicated causes'. He was referring to crippling state of American agriculture which left millions of Americans in poverty, the fundamental flaws of the banking system which collapsed when economic pressure was applied. However, the most important reason for the depression was the failure of the Republican government. To control an overheating economy, this now was trying to correct itself, with cataclysmic consequences for the economic welfare of the average American. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    How far do you agree with the view that Hoover simply extended the agonies ...

    4 star(s)

    to stimulate the economy and increased government spending", as stated by historian Paul Johnson. This tariff "limited international trade", which was indeed a massive mistake seeing as the USA was in great need of trading alliances to help their economy.

  2. How far do you agree with this description of the prosperity of the USA ...

    But foreign relations were being damaged by the tariffs placed on imported goods, intended to help eliminate competition for American business it was damaging businesses in foreign countries who were hoping to be able to sell a large volume of their produce in America.


    With as many as 60,000 people involved in buying on the margin (or 10% of American families), and millions more buying now, paying later, the cycle of prosperity and stock market investment was actually based on debt and credit. Secondly, the government encouraged the Bull market by publically rejecting critics who warned of danger signs in the economy.

  2. Asses the view that Hoovers policies and attitudes in the years 1929-33 merely prolonged ...

    Hoover did not realise exactly what was needed for the American economy as if he did, he would have realised that putting a 40% duty on agricultural products would not have stimulated the economy. This fantasy world consisted of just his own approach, which was not thought through, he believed

  1. Causes and Consequences Watergate

    The break-in at the Watergate building occurred on 17 June 1972. Five men were apprehended while adjusting eavesdropping equipment in the Democratic Party headquarters. It was not headline news as a White House connection was not apparent and no one outside of Nixon's circle could have guessed what the story would become.

  2. President Hoover and the Great Depression

    He saw the Great Depression as an opportunity for 'priming the pump'. He sought to achieve economic restoration through policies that, he initially hoped, would maintain purchasing power. The ramifications of this would be to preserve and nourish demand in the long-term, thereby preventing the repetition of economic crashes and downturns.

  1. The USA was hit by the Great Depression in 1929 because of increasing restrictions ...

    This caused America to hit the Depression and added to its severity; as the demand for consumer products within the USA had curtailed by 1929, as the majority of the population had already bought the consumer goods they wished on consumer credit.

  2. To what extent was the loss in confidence the main cause of the Wall ...

    However, Babson faced criticism for being too pessimistic and undermining the economic well-being of the nation. Regardless, President Coolidge had actually been warned since early as 1927 that there were to be serious problems with the stock exchange, he did not believe it was the job of the government to involve itself in the stock market.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work