• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far does a study of the period 1855 to 1956 suggest that, following the revolutions of 1917, the Russian people simply exchanged one form of autocracy for another?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far does a study of the period 1855 to 1956 suggest that, following the revolutions of 1917, the Russian people simply exchanged one form of autocracy for another? The term autocracy can be defined as a system of government in which all power is invested in an individual; in Tsarist Russia, this meant the Tsar had all authority. Autocracy under the Tsars can be split into several features: ability to create policy and laws, to appoint and dismiss ministers as he saw fit, using the Orthodox Church to underpin these ideas. Repression of political opponents was a further feature, alongside the use of the nobility to control the regions. Under the Bolsheviks, however, it could be viewed that the Government was the key area where the country was governed - it seems more likely though that actual power lay within the party - and the individual leaders themselves in particular. Without the Orthodox Church, terror and purges under the Bolsheviks kept the people in line in a similar way the Church did under the Tsars. Repression was not merely limited to political opponents; the party itself and the army bore much of the brunt of Stalin's purges - and the use of the 'Nomenklatura' aided in creating a central core within the party to control the regions of the Soviet Union. ...read more.

Middle

In comparison Stalin also mounted the 'revolution from above' when he decided to enforce change on the peasantry and opt for rapid industrialisation through the command economy - Gosplan. Although there were attempts to modernise industry under Nicholas II in the 1890s with French investment, and Witte's Great Spurt, nothing compared to the scale of industrialisation under Stalin, which arguably changed the Soviet Union ultimately into a great power, something the Tsars never achieved. Though the scale and priority differed measurably, the fact that there were attempts at industrialisation under the Tsars illustrates the similarity in the two systems. The third major feature of autocracy under the Tsars was repression of political opponents. It featured internal and external exile, and a Secret Police - the Third Section under Alexander II, succeeded by the Okhrana which was established by the Statute of State Security under Alexander III, killing 14,000 opponents in its existence. Repression under the Bolsheviks shared many of the same characteristics: the secret Police (Cheka 1917-22, OGPU 1922-34 and NKVD 1934-1954), and similar exile processes. However, under the Tsars repression was largely only political; however Lenin and Stalin developed this theme with Religious repression with the Great Terror, continued until the re-opening of the Churches in the Great Patriotic War, and purges of the party and army under Stalin. ...read more.

Conclusion

of ranks, with accompanying benefits but as previously mentioned were at a higher risk of being attacked to show a lesson to others; and the system of privileges utilised the desire within the party to become one of the Nomenklatura, this ultimately kept everybody loyal to the leader. Overall it can be seen that although the Tsars and Bolsheviks were given support of different elite bodies, they served very familiar roles, so in that way they are similar. Finally, it can be easily seen that throughout the major features of the autocracy under the Tsars, there are stark similarities with the major features of the 'autocracy' under Lenin and Stalin. The concept that Stalin was a 'Red Tsar' can be thoroughly supported in terms of the amount of power they ultimately held, methods used to control the population for their individual means, ruthless repression of opponents and use of an elite to support their regime. The only real evidence to suggest there is nothing other than similarities between the two autocracies of the Tsars and Bolsheviks is the scale of their operations, particularly repression - however it is clear that the two systems share the same basis for repression, such as the existence of a Secret Police and exile. Lenin shares slightly fewer similarities with the Tsars, however ultimately his policies, too, were largely Capitalist for instance NEP. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent does Stalin deserve the title of Red Tsar when assessing his ...

    5 star(s)

    The Tsars and the Church supported each other for mutual interest, and the teachings of the Church favoured autocracy11, since the majority of the population was religious, opposition to the government was seen as a direct challenge to God and the 'Divine Right' of the Tsar, this made any opposition unpopular.

  2. The Russian Revolution of October 1917 was potentially the most politically formative event of ...

    Partial involvement was due to the sudden withdrawal of Russia from the First World War, and the store of arms and weaponry which had been amassed in the region. Further, with Lenin's communist ideals came the firm decision to refuse to acknowledge Russia's debts, and to isolate the country (with the exception of the Comintern)

  1. Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin

    The first in agriculture, he stopped taking surplus crops and allowed peasants who could manage to grow more food than they needed to sell any extra for a profit. This was only a short term effect but it encouraged the peasants to cultivate more crops, however the government taxed any profit by 10%, which were to be paid in crops.

  2. Why Were There Two Revolutions in Russia in 1917?

    The Bloody Sunday massacre in 1905 was taken by many as a sign that the ruling class would not listen to any peaceful protests, and caused feeling of hate towards the tsar and tsarina. WWI also strengthened these feelings, and the majority of people began to believe that only through

  1. Did Stalin betray the Russian Revolution?

    According to Mark Kramer he saw repression by the state as a pragmatic necessity, and there was no question of what Trotsky called "so-called morality"2. Nationalism was not a Marxist feature.

  2. Explain why the opponents of the Tsars from 1855 to 1917 were more successful ...

    This meant that opponents to the Tsars were more successful than opponents to the communist regime. Use of terror was another continual theme of the period, however there is considerable change in how the regimes went about using it. Opponents to the Tsars enjoyed more success because the Tsarist regime

  1. Evaluate historical comparisons of Hitler and Stalin and their regimes

    This book was highly controversial as it compares the Nazi terror regime with communism. This is suggested in the title as it was derived from the black book of Nazi crimes which was produced at the Nuremberg trials. Courtois links the two by saying that communism sought to exterminate the

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    Another important aspect is that the unemployed people joined the ��Labour Armies.�� Peasants had to give their surplus food to the government and they could not sell a profit, and private trading was banned. The government allowed money to lose its value through inflation, abolished rents, railway fares, postal charges and many other payments.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work