• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far does Somerset deserve his reputation as the Good Duke? (Somerset (then known as Earl of Hertford) claimed the title of Lord Protector after the death of Henry VIII

Extracts from this document...


How far does Somerset deserve his reputation as the 'Good Duke'? (45) Edward Seymour, also known as the 1st Duke of Somerset, in many ways did not deserve his title as the 'Good Duke' due to the fact that not only did he used his position as Edward VI's uncle to gain autocratic power as 'Lord Protector', his arrogant and selfish style of government led to a collapse of not only the economy, but created many social, religious and political problems, leading to rebellions spreading across the country. Because of this, it would be unfair to call him a 'Good Duke' as his legacy did little good for his successors, having created a nation in a terrible state to save the governing of. Somerset (then known as Earl of Hertford) claimed the title of Lord Protector after the death of Henry VIII, when sometime before it was decided that he and an equal group of others (forming the Regency Council) would manage the throne for Edward VI whilst he was a child, 'thinking it the surest form of government and most fit for that commonwealth'. Being the boy king's uncle, it seemed natural for him to be his guardian, and he had soon gained trust by many members - allowing him the favour of being one of the leaders on this council. Somerset, however, played a game of factions, and his rise to power quickly as (self-named) 'Lord Protector' allowed the so called 'Good Duke' to successfully alienate others - giving his supporters positions of authority around him, whilst leaving those with other ideas along the sides to look upon with confusion and bitterness. ...read more.


Chantries, which were used to pray for the souls trapped in Purgatory - a state between heaven and hell in Catholic belief - were dissolved, with these buildings turned into bookshops and other things. Although these changes were changing the appearance of Catholicism in England, Somerset seemed to have 'gotten away with it' so far, as although people were perhaps angry with the changes, a lot of people accepted the changes quietly - after all they were not too hard to live with. It can be argued that these policies were soft - and Somerset in a kind fashion had not introduced any cruel punishment to punish those who opposed his idea - which led a lot of Catholics to hide their churchly images in annoyance rather than rebellion. It was not until May 1549 that Somerset introduced the Book of Common Prayer, did he really have a huge impact in terms of the religious reforms. These books were a guideline of what was to be said at all church services, and were completely in English, which was a huge leap from catholic Services which were held in Latin. This change aimed to make churches simpler - less about money and the show of religion, but more about the faith - according to the most radical Protestants. If the Book of Common Prayer was in English, it would be easier for everyone to hear the messages of God in clear plain English, something Catholics disagreed with, as they thought only trained and blessed priests should have been able to read the bible. ...read more.


(Susan Brigden). This suggests that he was not as brutal as he was made out to be (normally because of his cruel Military regime against Scotland), another reason as to why he good have been considered 'Good' to an extent, as previous Monarchs/rulers weren't often praised with 'Oh the commons pray for you sir'. Also, he could also be compared to the Duke of Northumberland, who inherits his position as Lord Protector. Northumberland has been compared to being a typical 'Machiavellian' character - a person who stabbed the back of others to get what he wanted, and although reform was perhaps more effective under Northumberland, it would be unfair to, if talking in terms of morals, call Northumberland a better Duke than Somerset. Overall, there are some things supporting the argument that Somerset could be described as a 'Good Duke' if comparing him to Northumberland. Overall it would seem that Somerset did not deserve the title as the 'Good Duke' because of the overall negative effect he had in government, and his policies that failed to successfully bring religious reform in the country, whilst causing further economic damage due to his blind war expenditure from his obsession with the Scotland conflict. Somerset's overall attitude towards governing was also partly to blame - he created many enemies for himself due to making decisions on his own constantly, alienating certain members who would then plot against him and because of this, he would be solely to blame for the actions he took. Although he didn't mean to cause extra damage, it is undeniable that his actions proved that he didn't deserve to be called the 'Good Duke'. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How Successful Were the Religious Reforms of Somerset and Northumberland?

    4 star(s)

    This was a real time for debate in the Privy Council as it was afraid of swinging too far towards Protestantism, less it caused at Roman Catholic backlash. As a compromise, the heresy and treason laws of Henry VIII were not enforced.

  2. The British reforms to change India failed because the British would sometimes use force ...

    The conference agreed to make an All India Federation where all the Indian States would take control of most matters except for Defence, Foreign Affairs and Finance. However, the major problem was the Congress did not attend as most of its leaders, including Gandhi were in prison, so this made the Conference stand for nothing.

  1. How far did Henry VIII continue the policies of his father 1509-1514?

    His father had been so wary of the nobility in high places that he had set up 'The council learned', made up of professionals with whom he would converse with about policy's rather than the nobility.

  2. Henry VIII and Religion

    which had been alleged against him. To the Lutheran envoys in 1538 he admitted that he was of their persuasion, but would 'as the world stood, believe even as his master the King believed'. This circumspect answer comes nearest to the truth, though his faith proved strong enough to drive him faster than the King wanted.

  1. "To what extent had Henry VIII left an explosive legacy to his son Edward ...

    Henry thought that these laws would sort the problem of the division of religion. So Henry tried not to leave a explosive legacy for his son, but in some cases within religion he was unable to change peoples religions and their feelings towards it.

  2. Does Alexander II deserve the title of 'Tsar liberator'?

    ?It is better to abolish serfdom from above than to await the time when it will begin to abolish itself from below?[4]. This statement could be seen to be merely a persuasive technique employed by Alexander, and a way of getting the nobility to support him, perhaps a way of

  1. How far was England a Protestant nation on the death of Henry VIII in ...

    Two more injunctions which had a big impact on the nation were the reduction of Holy days (or holidays), Protestants thought they were superstitious and had sought to end them; and the command for Bibles in English for people to read in Church.

  2. The fall of the Duke of Somerset was principally a result of the impact ...

    Instead of Somerset immediately crushing the rebel threat he attempted to appease them by sending York Herald to Mousehold Heath and offer them the chance to leave peacefully and avoid any law charges. Instead of settling the matter this seemed to push the Kett army into Norwich which fell under the rebel?s pressure within 5 days.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work