• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far does Stalins position as General Secretary explain his success in defeating his rivals in the years 1924-1929

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far does Stalin's position as General Secretary explain his success in defeating his rivals in the years 1924-1929? Following Lenin's seemingly premature death, the Communist leadership in Russia was thrown into disorganisation and disarray. Different ideas for the future of socialism were unveiled and out of this ideological confusion contenders for party leader emerged; amongst these, Stalin. Through the next turbulent 5 year period a struggle occurred between these contenders, and Stalin emerged successful as the new leader of the USSR. Stalin's position of General Secretary and other factors all contributed to this appointment - a leader that would effectively win the Second World War and enforce totalitarianism throughout Russia. Before a true struggle for power had even begun, Stalin had tricked Trotsky to not turn up to Lenin's funeral: this was seen as disastrous on Trotsky's part - a total disrespect for Leninism itself. However, Stalin's true movements for power began after the Triumvirate was established. It consisted of Zinoviev, Kamenev and Stalin himself, and they were heavily opposed by Trotsky; then Head of the Red Army. It is important to note that had it not have been for Stalin's role as General Secretary he would not have succeeded; this position allowed him access to the bureaucratic parts of the administration and allowed his scheme of patronage. ...read more.

Middle

Primarily, this seems like a weakness in Stalin's power struggle; it was however key to his victory - all this time he asserted his role as General Secretary by bringing more supporters into the Politburo and Sovnarkom and built a now formidable powerbase: scores of influential Stalinist delegates were instated, most notably the vastly successful Vyacheslav Molotov who went on to serve a lengthy political career alongside Stalin. As a result, although in the first stage of the struggle for power in Russia, Trotsky did dismantle his position with personal mistakes and Zinoviev and Kamenev did weaken him sufficiently, Stalin was immensely important. He built up his powerbase and used patronage to the best of his ability throughout the period which resulted in the political defeat of Trotsky. After this event however, Zinoviev and Kamenev left the Triumvirate due to Stalin's policy of 'Socialism in One Country'. They saw the NEP as weak and unnecessary - therefore in 1925 they attacked Stalin with a vote of no confidence. It is important to note that at this time Stalin was not alone: he had teamed up with the right wing Bukharin (he was very popular with the people) to help boost NEP popularity. ...read more.

Conclusion

And this was completed without threat of the gulags, without the threat of imprisonment and without the threat of murder - political prowess gained him victory alongside other factors. It would be ignorant to solely admire Stalin for his climb to power - he was helped along by luck (the death of Lenin came along at an advantageous time), the weaknesses of his opponents (Trotsky tore himself apart at some points of the struggle) and the help of his early allies (Zinoviev and Kamenev were key to the dismantling of Trotsky in the early years of the struggle). But all along Stalin had ensured he was allied with the stronger players and continued to build up his powerbase through the trickiest of times. Although there were other factors associated with Stalin - he was loyal to the proletariat and excruciatingly cunning - the position of General Secretary was absolutely paramount to his rise to power after Lenin's death: it gave him the ability to appoint whoever he liked to the Politburo and Sovnarkom. Without this patronage, Stalin would most likely have not gained the power of the USSR. In conclusion, Stalin's opponents did make mistakes, Stalin's personal attributes were important, luck was a major factor and he was helped along the way. But his position of General Secretary made sure that he could not be defeated politically in the struggle for power 1924-1929. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How far does Stalins position as General Secretary explain his success in defeating his ...

    As appointed as Commissar of peasants and workers inspectectorate, Stalin also had the power to expel those from the government who disagreed with him. All of these important positions in the party, especially General Secretary, combined meant Stalin had a hugely powerful role within Communism, and it was the way

  2. Is it right to say "Stalin gained power in the years 1924-1929 only because ...

    The unity amongst Stalin's opponents was all but non-existent. The supposed "united opposition" from the left wing of Trotsky, Kamenev and Zinoviev were in no way united. Kamenev and Zinoviev were often together but they were against Trotsky. In 1924they mounted a campaign against Trotsky by trying to tarnish his reputation.

  1. How far did the achievements of Stalin's economic modernisation programme justify the costs?

    It was started in mid-1929 for two reasons, firstly because it was part of Marxist theory that all land had to be owned by the state, with no private land being used to make profits on goods farmed there. The second reason was that Stalin wanted a platform to kick

  2. How successful were Stalin's economic policies?

    State control of the economy also led to disruption of the plans when managers and workers who failed to achieve targets were prosecuted and removed from their positions. Heavy industry was not the only area affected by the plans. Consumer industry also developed, though did not necessarily improve.

  1. How far do you agree Communist ideology influenced Stalin's decision to implement Collectivisation in ...

    that labour camps, terror and secret police were all around during Lenin's rule as well. Intentionalists, like Kolakowski, argue Lenin much like Stalin used policies to consolidate power and work to his own agenda, supporting my argument that Collectivisation was foreshadowed by Lenin's agricultural conflicts.

  2. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    Even more important there was no agreement on a unified military strategy, nor was there a commitment by the allies not to make a separate peace with France if it suited their interests to do so. * Although Austrian and Russian forces pushed the French out of Italy in the

  1. The weaknesses of the Left Opposition were responsible for Stalins victory in the Soviet ...

    This is also a similar case for the 13th party conference, were Trotsky was isolated and his policies humiliated. Stalin managed to make sure all Trotsky supporters did not have voting positions within the party to make change. This would have isolated Trotsky who would have needed as much support as he could get to stand up to Stalin.

  2. To what extent was Stalins position within the party and his manipulation of the ...

    within the party that he was using to his advantage and therefore they did not manage to stop his rise to power.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work