• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far does the evidence suggest that the early 16th Century Church exploited religious faith to increase wealth?

Extracts from this document...


Emma Yeo How far does the evidence suggest that the early 16th Century Church exploited religious faith to increase wealth? The early 16th Century Church was an important authority in the lives of many, including ordinary people, but to some it was also seen as exploitative of people?s faith in order to gain additional revenue. Source 1, an extract from an anti-clerical pamphlet by Simon Fish, suggests that people were exploited with money going to the ?greedy horde?, a wholly negative image. The idea that ?priests are not shepherds? reiterates that the role of priests and other religious figures is to guide people especially those like ?sheep? who cannot help themselves; it is their role to bring people closer to God. Instead, they are described as ?ravenous wolves? with a strength that they may use to control or manipulate in an unfair way. Source 2 gives a view completely opposite to this, suggesting that the Church is a deserving authority, rather than one which exploits faith for monetary gain. ...read more.


There was a focus especially in the source (published in 1529 prior to the full separation from Rome) on the ?poor wives? and also on the authority of ?the King?; the importance of those who are deserving of charity and Henry who Fish believed should be obeyed over religious power. There is a possibility that the source would have been intended for the more influential to see and realise that the Church may be a problem if it can avoid ?the laws?, it is a warning. On the other hand, Source 2 by Aske is evidence produced under oath, meaning that it should technically be what he believes to be the truth, but also that he was largely trying to protect himself as he was in a position where he was likely to be executed after being arrested in 1537. He had to defend himself and also the Church, as a strong Catholic ? he led a revolt to London and was against Henry and the Reformation and was trying to prevent the inevitable. ...read more.


An alternative viewpoint is that the ?rest of my goods? is an incredibly high price, perhaps to the extent of being exploitation simply for prayers although obviously they had meaning to the woman ? the fact that there was nothing to be left to her family etc may be seen as exploitation, taking all that the woman has left to give in return for this service. The fact that someone was so willing to give up everything, even if it was when she had no use for it, simply in return for prayers and song shows that many people?s belief in religion was strong and real; to a greater extent than that of Source 2 ? Aske also had some ulterior motive, to protect himself after a rebellion. The overall view though as presented by the sources, is that for many people religion was incredibly important and on the whole the Church was not overly exploitative to increase it?s wealth as people wanted the services the Church could give. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Was the Henrician Reformation inevitable?

    the Dissolution of the Monasteries. The importance of the divorce to Henry played a major role in triggering the reformation and the actions that he had to take to obtain this pushed him into cutting all ties with Rome and stumbling into the reformation.

  2. How do the poets in 'Charlotte O'Neils song' and 'Nothing Changed' show their feelings ...

    The poet also shows his anger by the way he ends the poem with a desire to stone the building. He is just as angry now as he was a s a young man. Hope this helps. Submitted by: David Tutty, (Age 16)

  1. The Reformation was the intellectual movement in Western Europe in the 16th century which ...

    Frustrated by the disapproval of his divorce, King Henry ordered the Archbishop of Canterbury to grant him a divorce against the wishes of the pope. These actions led to Ann Boleyn's crowning of queen, and Henry's excommunication by the pope in Rome, meaning that his soul would never go to heaven (Truman, 1).

  2. How far does the evidence of Sources 1, 2 and 3 suggest that the ...

    Source one makes a claim that money was pulled in for ?wills and testaments? and likewise source three portrays greed for money as an issue stating ?for? my goods? a priest shall sing for my soul?. This suggests that the Church was predominantly self-centred and that acts of prayer and

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work