• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far does the North-South divide in Italy explain the weakness of the Liberal State in the years 1896-1921?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐How far does the North-South divide in Italy explain the weakness of the Liberal State in the years 1896-1921? Upon unification the Liberal State was formed within Italy, a system of government that ensured a supposedly fair system of government. Despite this, the Liberal State was largely damaged and its weakness exposed by several major factors, including the increasing North-South divide, the rise and threat of extremism, failure in foreign policy as well as arguably the most important explanation for weakness: political instability which would leave Italy in turmoil. The North-South divide became an extreme point of contention for much of Italian society. The original unification process was headed mainly by Piedmont, and many Southern Italians could not see the difference between Piedmont?s ?unification? aims and colonisation of southern Italian states, and upon proclamation of the unification of Italy d?Azeglio suggested that the new state ?now?must make Italians?. From that point, the Liberal State showed inherent weakness in that the North-South divide exposed how the government failed to calm social contention, with only the north benefitting from the push towards industrialism; the north saw rapid economic growth with new engineering techniques and a push towards mechanisation, while the south remained relatively agricultural and backwards when compared to the north. Notably the south saw the most abject poverty, with much of it being controlled by the mafia or the elite; roughly 0.01% of the population in Southern Italy owned over half the land available. ...read more.


Another political failure that explains the weakness of government was the failure to come to an agreement with the Papacy, who influenced the large majority of the population. The formation of the Liberal State was rejected by Pope Pius IX, and Catholics were ordered not to participate in national elections, contributing to the divide between the ruling elite and the normal commoner who were unable to relate to the government, often choosing instead to follow Papal orders. Clearly this factor explains much more of the reasons to the Liberal State?s failure, as it exposes how the large majority of the Italian population were either unable to participate in government and be represented, or for the Liberal State to be completely ignored such as in the case of Papal intervention. Another important explanation for the failures in the Italian state was the threat of extremism. The Liberal government were frequently forced to introduce reforms such as limiting working hours and child labour in order to pacify supporters of more radical political parties such as the PSI, yet attempt to remain at a balance by introducing nationalistic education to appease the nationalists who yearned for a stronger Italian identity. From this, it is possible to see how extremism was in fact able to control much of the Liberal State?s policies; policies were no longer being made just to improve the lives of Italian?s, but also in a constant back and forth attempt to curb political extremism. ...read more.


This failure exposed another weakness in the Liberal State in the inherent inability to negotiate successfully on international tables, and was a trigger for the rising extremists that would take over the Italian state. While this ultimately was one of the triggers to the Liberal State?s downfall, underlying issues such as the inherent political instability can explain why foreign policy resulted in a failure, and also the reasons that extremism emerged within the Italian population. Therefore, foreign policy only contributes to a limited extent in explaining the failures of the Liberal State. Overall, it is possible to see that the most important factor and the factor that explained the failures to the largest extent was indeed ultimately political instability. Political instability as an underlying cause for failure provided a breeding ground for extremism to emerge, which only worsened the already existing problems faced by the Liberal State; the successive governments were constantly forced to pacify the demands of individuals on an entirely different end of the political spectrum which could only end in failure. This failure would later contribute to the assertive foreign policy which ironically showed the unassertiveness of the Liberal State when it came to international negotiations, and therefore clearly while the North-South divide does explain some of the failures of the Liberal State in governing Italy and improving general living conditions, ultimately all other factors were as a result of a general failure in politics: political instability. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How far does the North South divide in Italy explain the weaknesses of the ...

    In addition,by abolishing internal tariffs and establishing a single Italian market harmed what little industry existed in the south as it could not compete with the more advanced north.Furthermore, it was not only the economy which contributed to the north south divide but also cultural differences.

  2. To what extent was the Italian Liberal state unstable in the years 1896 ...

    Wages were still very low and hours were long in comparison with the rest of Western Europe. Welfare benefits, such as sickness and pension payments, also compared unfavourably. The wealth of the country had been spent on attempts to control more land in East Africa and Libya, whilst severe poverty was still widespread.

  1. How Secure was Liberal Italy in 1914?

    to encourage a Catholic influence in society, and the Carabinieri - who were the military police, becoming more popular and more widely regarded and respected. Despite these growing signs of Italian Unity, Italy's condition was still largely insecure and the problems that the country faced were potentially extremely damaging to the prospect of a completely united Italy.

  2. Free essay

    To what extent had Liberal Italy satisfied the needs of Italians by 1914?

    The problems led up to 'Red Romagna', or Red Week, which saw eo areas proclaim themselves as independent republics. A general strike was called but the various Socialist groups failed to organise themselves successfully, so it failed. The second problem facing Italy was social.

  1. Discuss and contrast De Berniere's presentation of politicians in Captain Corelli's Mandolin

    'Metaxas' spectacles misted over, and behind them I could see tears. It is a hard thing to see a powerful man, a dictator, reduced to this state'. The image of the prime minister evokes a sense of sympathy. Metaxas is a Fascist leader, who used indoctrination, terror and press censorship in his leadership.

  2. Soviet State

    As the peasants made up almost 85% of the population the problem in essence was to extract more labour and resources from the peasantry. * By 1928 neither of the major strategies considered in the 1920s seemed adequate (Bukharin vs.

  1. The weakness of the liberal state in Italy in 1919 was mainly caused ...

    The pope also criticised the war, claiming it was useless slaughter. The tensions between these three main political groups and the anti-war attitude that they all adopted meant that support for liberal Italy declined even more during the war. The divisions between political groups led to social problems arising due to the war.

  2. How significant was foreign influence in shaping Italian political and social development in the ...

    The Prusso-Austrian war of 1866 and Franco-Prussian war of 1870, both of which Prussia emerged victorious, aided the taking of Venetia and Rome respectively. Thus, it was conflicts abroad that allowed for a weakened Austrian position, Martin Clark highlighting how "war succeeded where diplomacy failed."[8] A weakened Austria allowed the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work