• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far is killing in warfare more justifiable than other kinds of killing?

Extracts from this document...


How far is killing in warfare more justifiable than other kinds of killing? The justification of war has been an ideal that has caused much debate and controversy for humanity throughout all time. The early church took the teaching of Jesus literally, and opposed violence and killing for any purpose, but as the church gradually became more involved in the affairs of state, its teachings began to change. When in 324 CE, the emperor Constantine made Christianity the state religion of the Roman Empire, the church turned from pacifism and accepted the use of armed force by the state as justifiable. In the time the Doctrine of the just war was developed, and most of the church has accepted this view but the early pacifism of the church later resurfaced in heretical movement like the Cathars and the Anabaptists. The Christian conception of a well-ordered, peaceful society, the City of God, was maintained and influenced by the ideal of just war. ...read more.


He proceeded to establish which wars were "just" and thus allowed morally. This just war tradition concerned itself with the moral issues of waging war. The basic premise for all just war is the concept of love for neighbour. The unselfish motivations fuelled the inhabitants of the City of God to protect their neighbours from evil. St Thomas Aquinas in the thirteenth century laid down the ideals for waging just war are: when it is right to resort to armed force (Ius ad bellum) and what is right when using force (Ius in Bello). Ius in Bello includes the moral necessities that armed force should be discriminate and proportionate. Ius ad bellum included the following requirements: 1) just Cause 2) authorized by a competent authority 3) motivated by right intention 4) pass four prudential tests: it must a) be expected to produce a preponderance of good over evil, b) have a reasonable hope of success, c) ...read more.


it, and that is why people believe that the killing of innocent people during war is seen as different to the killing of an innocent man by a random person in a street. I do believe there is a difference in that I take the utilitarian view that as long as it is for the greatest good for the greatest number of people and that war should be used as a last resort and that the outcome should always be positive however there is one point within the utilitarian view point that I do not agree with and that is the fact that it is not the death of innocent people that is the objected to though regrettable this can be excused in terms of military necessity it rather the use of weapons which inflicts pain out of all proportion to the military or political advantages gained by it's use. My main concern within warfare is the killing out thousands maybe millions during war and second is the concern with the weapons. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The Sinking of the Lusitania A Justifiable Act of War, or an Immoral Attack ...

    It is a valuable source because it was not a biased account of the incident; it was written by Americans that did not follow the nationwide trend of condemnation. "Many American newspapers strongly condemn the German sinking of the Lusitania, a British passenger ship on which Americans were sailing.

  2. Explain the different Christian attitudes to warfare.

    Like St Thomas Aquinas for example. He came up with the just war criteria. These were. The war must be proportionate. It must be a last resort. No innocent civilians can be killed. It must be controlled by a sovereign or authority of state. There must be a just cause.

  1. Do the Writings of Clausewitz have contemporary relevance?

    General Aideed had no such restrictions - and it showed - he was repeatedly able to gain the upper hand and when US/UN troops attempted to capture him he was able to ambush and kill literally dozens of them.27 The images of American bodies being abused were enough to force

  2. Pacifism and Christianity

    Since official persecution (with minor exceptions) ceased by 380 A.D. there have not been the same historical reasons to justify pacifism. Perhaps the best expression of the sentiment of contemporary pacifism is found: QUOTES FROM THE MENONITES SPEECH> The most longstanding and widespread attempt to resolve the problem of pacifiscm as a religious ethic follows the tradition of the "Just War" doctrine.

  1. Assess whether any moral principles have relevance to warfare.

    The single most relevant fact to any moral assessment upon warfare, conventional, terrorist or even total warfare is of the immense power and destructiveness. The tradition has thus been doubly influential, dominating both moral and legal discourse surrounding war. Just war theory can be meaningfully divided into two parts.

  2. "War is killing and all killing is wrong therefore war is wrong" Do you ...

    the killing of them is a great sin" (Surah 17:31) This would suggest to Muslims that this form of killing is wrong but we must also look for where killing is allowed such as in battles where we know Muhammed slayed many of his enemies which would suggest that it is allowed for the killing of humans in war.

  1. What is pacifism?

    of just cause, the most systematic exposition is given by Saint Thomas Aquinas. In the Summa Theologicae Aquinas presents the general outline of what becomes the just war theory. He discusses not only the justification of war, but also the kinds of activity that are permissible in war.

  2. Life in lead How did humanity go so wrong? In the space of ...

    I wish I'd died with all the others. Their faces haunt me, I see them in my head and I shudder. I will never see those faces again but I'll remember them, and every hour of every day, I'll replay the events that killed them all. * * * My life first started to change one mundane day in June.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work