• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far should Gorbachev be blamed for the collapse of the Soviet Union?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far should Gorbachev be blamed for the collapse of the Soviet Union? On December 5 1991 the Soviet Union was declared officially non-existent, radically changing the world's economic and political environment. On the 10 February 1991 Heydar Aliyev spoke in Parliament warning of his anticipation that the Soviet Union was to collapse, "The Culprit to be blamed is Gorbachev". There is no doubt Gorbachev played a prominent role in the fall of communism in the USSR and the collapse of the USSR itself, as well as acquiring the responsibility for ending the Cold War, a major post-war tension. What I will endeavour to conclude in this essay is the extent to which Gorbachev was responsible for the USSR's downfall and the other factors which became an affect. Gorbachev was born into a peasant family on 2 March 1931. After realising law was not to be his proffesion he joined the communist party of the Soviet Union in 1952. ...read more.

Middle

The Russian citizens were highly attentive when in 16 December1986 Gorbachev released the father of the atomic H-bomb from exile and later released political prisoners. Gorbachev told the Central Committee who elected him that when the people are elected, "the more consciencely they act, the more actively they support the party" (Steven White). With the knowledge of the past- information to define the good and the bad actions of the Soviet Union he believed the people would make a concerted effort in restructuring the economy and participating in reforming their country. Many a critic views glasnost as fundamental in the USSR collapse. For seventy years the Soviet Union had withheld information and in doing so upheld their power, Gorbachev believed a slow, judicious release of information would jump start productivity and dig out the bureaucracy preventing economic growth. A catalytic factor in the downfall of the regime in favour of the newly available 'information'. ...read more.

Conclusion

Gorbachev found himself answering to protests rather than introducing reform, yet the more democracy that was introduced the greater demand there was for reform. Furthermore the Baltic nations now had a larger voice emphasising the case for the Soviet Bloc independence, the democratic rule contradicted the venture to disallow their independence. Gorbachev believed, as he did with glasnost, democratisation would aid the legitimisation of the Communist Party's power. = Anticipating the Collapse of the Soviet Union Heydar Aliyev's Speech February 10, 1991 The culprit to be blamed is Gorbachev, who seized the power of the Central Committee of the Soviet Party along with all the power of the government. During the past five years, Gorbachev has made so many promises to the nation but has kept none of them. There is a void between word and action, and a gap between political leadership and the nation. This has resulted in skepticism and disbelief in the government and the people's disappointment in the future has increased to the extent that the influence of the Communist Party doesn't exist any more. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. UNIT 6: PAPER 6b: THE SOVIET UNION AFTER LENIN

    There were no rivals or even people prepared to question his judgement. He was surrounded by people who owed their position to him, and who, like Yagoda and Yezhov, could just as easily be removed when they were no longer needed.

  2. The great war plan, preparations, collapse, and recovery - a revised view

    * In August 1939, Stalin had secret negotiations with Germany and, seperately, with Britain and France. On one hand, Hitler told Stalin he was going to attack Poland and needed to know whether Russia will allow it (or even participate)

  1. Why did tsarism collapse?

    The problems created by the growth of an urban working class were the formation of unions and grievances regarding the living conditions in these new industrial hotbeds. This led to the inevitable strikes which were a feature of pre-war Russia.

  2. Why did communism collapse in Eastern Europe?

    When Khrushchev came to power, however, there as renewed hope in the West that there might be a "thaw" in relations between the two blocs. Relations between the two blocs did improve with Khrushchev attending a number of conferences and meetings.

  1. How far did Kennan's ideas actually shape US policy towards the Soviet Union?

    America's foreign policy in the two world wars could be viewed in a similar light. America was preventing vital power centers "from falling under hostile control." (Gaddis 5) Kennan placed emphatic limits on the reach of containment in this manner.

  2. What factors have prompted democratisation in Argentina?

    'Terrorist' elements' were arrested and killed; mainly Marxist-Leninist guerrillas who wanted the regime overthrown by revolutionary socialism, but also thousands of civilians who were utterly innocent. This 'dirty war,' begun in the early seventies could now be conducted with the full backing and resources of the state.

  1. What were Gorbachev's intentions when he launched Glasnost and Perestroika, and how far did ...

    enterprises by cutting out some of the middle levels that increased the level of bureaucracy.9 For the state enterprises, managing their own affairs meant "khoraschot," or self-financing. This scheme had been introduced without much success under Brezhnev, and meant that enterprises would be responsible for their own costs, profits and

  2. After the collapse of the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center, the world ...

    Simply, Kaplan is using West Africa as a symbol to describe the rest of the world when he says "West Africa is becoming the symbol of worldwide demographic, environmental, and societal stress, in which criminal anarchy emerges as the real 'strategic' danger."7 Over-population, scarcity of resources, refugee migration and crime

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work