• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far should the policy of collectivisation of agriculture in the Soviet Union (1929-1940) be regarded as a disaster?

Extracts from this document...


How far should the policy of collectivisation of agriculture in the Soviet Union (1929-1940) be regarded as a disaster? Collectivisation or collective farming is a system of agricultural organization in which farm labourers are not paid via wages. Instead, the workers receive a share of the farm's net productivity. The Soviet Union undertook the first campaign of collectivisation between 1929 and 1933. There were benefits to collectivisation; it provided a large-scale organisation of food production for the farms. However there were many problems with it; the changes were enforced by the army and by law, also the Kulaks were merely scapegoats for inefficient food production. Stalin amalgamated the farms and put them under state control. In the following paragraphs I will see how far Stalin's policy of collectivisation of agriculture in the USSR (1929-1940) should be considered as a disaster. There were advantages and successes during collectivisation. By 1939, 99% of land had been collectivised throughout the USSR and 90% of all peasants lived on one of the 250,000 Kolkhoz. ...read more.


The seizures of grain discouraged the peasants and less grain was produced during 1928 and again the government resorted to requisitions. In 1929, resistance to the seizures became widespread with some violent incidents of resistance but also massive hoarding (burial was the common method) and illegal transfers of grain. If they could not hide or otherwise dispose their entire crops, some peasants harvested it as hay, burned it, or threw it into the rivers. This all led to the enforcement of collectivisation throughout the Soviet Union. However collectivisation had the worse effects on the Kulaks, who were merely scapegoats for Stalin's failings. He called for the liquidation of all Kulaks (i.e. genocide) and an estimated 10 million were murdered or sent to labour camps. However when Stalin blamed them for the famine he was in fact partly correct. Many Kulaks burned their own crops and killed livestock so as not to appear a Kulak. ...read more.


If the people had supported it the "Kulaks" would not have been persecuted, there would not have been a famine and millions would not have died. So in answer to the question: how far should the policy of collectivisation of agriculture in the Soviet Union (1929-1940) be regarded as a disaster? I believe that we should not consider collectivisation an absolute disaster; it certainly achieved its primary aim of consolidating individual land and labour. By 1939, 99% of land had been collectivised which is certainly an impressive feat. However one must remember that it was a social catastrophe; nearly 20 million men and women died, a whole class of people were wiped out and there was starvation throughout the whole of the Soviet Union. One must remember that the systematic killing of people on a massive scale outweighs all achievements. An example of the losses sustained from collectivisation and the famine in Soviet Ukraine alone is: "Imagine the Titanic sinking every day for thirteen years; such were the losses from the 1933 Famine Genocide in Soviet Ukraine!" Melanie Bobrowski ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. 'Collectivisation was a political success but an economic failure and a human disaster'

    Stalin told the people of Russia that kulaks were keeping back food for themselves and thus damaging the country, whether he truly believed this or not it was one of the great mistakes of the transformation of agriculture; the peasants were generally not hoarding grain, in fact many only just had enough to feed themselves and for small trading.

  2. A direct comparison of the role of central power and control during the late ...

    role as the 'little father,' the Soviet era of fear and repression paired with a cult of personality was far more effective. Stalin was determined to eliminate such 'harmful superstitions,'22 as religion and religious belief. Communist control of the church came mainly through groups such as the League of Militant

  1. How far would agree that the strength of the British government was the main ...

    A scheme of State-sponsored elementary education was started; the Board of Works was overhauled; an attempt was made in 1832 to solve the tithe question; Ireland was included in the plans for parliamentary reform. In the reform struggle in parliament, O'Connell's support was invaluable and the numerical support of his followers indispensible to the Ministry's survival.

  2. Assess Louis achievements in foreign policy by 1684. Account for his success in this ...

    Another of Louis' key achievements in foreign policy was the increased gloire for both himself and his country. This can be seen in many ways. Both the War of Devolution and the Dutch War enlarged his gloire because of the effectiveness of the French military machine during the wars and the diplomatic machine in preparation for the wars.

  1. How far was the monarchy stronger in 1603 than in 1485?

    In 1603 there is a stronger partnership between the monarchy and the nobility which is reflected in parliament. Like with Henry VIII, Elizabeth is not weary of powerful nobles. We do see however, a lot of power being given to the new men, especially Cecil.

  2. The cult of Stalin and the purges of the 1930(TM)s were two aspects of ...

    of the NKVD (secret police), tried and executed.[3][4] As a result of Kirov's death and the betrayal Stalin had encountered during the period surrounding the assassination, Stalin began enforcing the 'great purges'. The first phase began in 1935 and was devised to rid the Party of any political opponents or threats.

  1. In the context of India in the 1840s to 1947, how far can independence ...

    In 1940, Churchill as British Prime Minister, made no effort to hide that he was against Indian independence and anti-Gandhi. "The mere mention of India, brought out a streak of unpleasantness or even irrationality in Churchill.?[28] When Gandhi was

  2. Despite frequent changes in policy, Russian and Soviet governments were spectacularly unsuccessful in securing ...

    For example: ?There was very little investment in agriculture in Imperial Russia and this lead to small yields and economic volatility when prices rose and fell?lack of investment in agriculture frequently caused grain prices to rise which caused famines?[4] Overall, although agriculture grew slightly during the Tsarist regime, ultimately it suffered greatly as did the Russian people.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work