• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far was a shared ideology responsible for improved relations between Germany and Italy, during the period, 1936-39?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far was a shared ideology responsible for improved relations between Germany and Italy, during the period, 1936-39? Germany and Italy were very similar in many ways. They were both one party states with a strong leader and state control of the economy. They shared an expansionist foreign policy and had the same methods of military (private armies). Both Germany and Italy shared nationalist views and a joint hatred of communism. They both hated the Treaty of Versailles and wanted it to be revised as they had both come off badly from it. Germany had lost some of its land from it, and Italy had not got what it had wanted 'The Mutilated Victory' But this was not the only reason for the improved relations, circumstances such as the weaknesses displayed by western allies led to furthering the link between Germany and Italy and their shared ideology was just the foundation to their relationship. In the years before this, 1933-35 the relations had been tense. Mussolini had felt himself to be more senior than Hitler and there was also a traditional sense of Italian superiority, due to the legacy of the Roman Empire. Examples of this tension include the meeting between the two leaders in June 1934 when Hitler turned up dressed in casual clothes, whereas Mussolini was in full uniform. ...read more.

Middle

In October 1936 the Lira developed by 40% Germany and Italy got other countries to join with them Italy joined the Anti-Comintern Pact (formed between Germany and Italy, on the 25th November 1936) on the 6th of November 1937. Thereby creating a new Rome-Berlin-Tokyo Axis,. There was a waver in the improving relations in 1938. Hitler had taken over control of the military, after purging his military and foreign office officials. On the 4th of February he announced 'From now on I take over personally the command of the whole armed forces' In March 1938 there was a potential for tension after Germany did not inform Mussolini of her intentions to unite with Austria, breaking the agreement made in January 1936. But Mussolini ignored Scushnigg's called for help, and refused to return it. Hitler thanked Mussolini for this. Although, saying that he would 'never forget' what Mussolini had done in agreeing to this Anschluss. This was a major turnaround from 1934 when Mussolini had sent his own troops to prevent the Anschluss. In 1939, there seemed to be a 'pivotal moment' in that Hitler was becoming the more powerful, dominant of the two men. This was because of the triumphs in Foreign Policy. ...read more.

Conclusion

We see this in Hitler's ability to ignore the terms of the Anti-Comintern pact by forming the Nazi-Soviet Pact in August 1939. Mussolini sent Hitler a letter outlining his worries and queries on 25th August 1939. ' I consider it my implicit duty as a true friend to tell you the whole truth and inform you about the actual situation in advance. Not to do so might have unpleasant consequences for us all. This is my point of view and since within a short time I must summon the highest governmental bodies of the realm, I ask you to let me know yours as well.' Benito Mussolini I can hence conclude that it was not solely a shared ideology that was responsible for the improved relations between Germany and Italy, although this may have been the primary motivation. The weaknesses displayed by the allies, during this period allowed Hitler to take advantage of the situation and led to further relations with Italy. Allies weren't in a position to stop this as neither had alliances or relations with the Germany or Italy as they had been isolated from their western counterparts. It may also be considered a false statement to say that relations where always improved during this time. There were in fact a lot of troubles and grievances between the two countries such as the Pact of Steel. Hitler and Mussolini together on Mussolini's visit to Germany ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Hitlers Germany

    All this combines to create a picture of which the best description is Hitler's own famous sentence: 'I go the way that Providence dictates with the assurance of a sleepwalker." The former French Ambassador speaks of him as 'a man possessed'; Hermann Rauschning writes: 'Dostoevsky might well have invented him,

  2. Compare and contrast the situation in Italy 1919-22 with that in Germany 1919-29.

    Germans didn't feel safe as home anymore considering that the Treaty disarmed German and had placed troops in the Rhineland for strategic political reasons. In addition to the sorrow that came along with the treaty was the difficulties Ebert faced n running the government after the war including threats from

  1. The Wannsee Conference was entirely responsible for the Holocaust. How valid is this assessment ...

    Rademacher who was Head of Jewish affairs in the German Ministry's Department for Internal German Affairs that suggests "the desirable solution is all Jews out of Europe...In the peace treaty France must make the island of Madagascar available for the solution of the Jewish question."

  2. What key factors explain Germany's changing relations with Italy in the years 1933-1939?

    The essential difference was that Hitler's empire was to be one based on racism, made up of the Aryan race, with the notable absence of many minorities - Slavs, Jews and Gypsies, to name a few. Hitler was anti-Semitic above anything else, but this was not an attitude which Mussolini shared until some years later, under Hitler's influence.

  1. "Hitler's foreign policy successes between 1936 and 1939 rested on his remarkable tactical skills ...

    There was a small amount of protest from Britain and France, but as Hitler had presumed, they were unwilling to take any real action against him. France was war weary; Britain was suffering economically and concerned with the defence of their empire in the east.

  2. Would you agree with the view that conflict over Berlin in the period 1945-1990 ...

    Under the premise of "Technical difficulties" Stalin ordered the closing of all rail lines, canals and roads that entered West Berlin through the Russian sector, cutting off supplies of food and fuel. In reality the motive was for the west to capitulate and withdraw from Berlin, leaving the USSR in control.

  1. In the light of what was known at the time Britain's policy towards Germany ...

    Yet British policy did not change to counter Hitler's rise to power the fact that some people distrusted Hitler gave no-one the right or power to intervene. Rather it was hoped the problem would solve itself, for people thought that Hitler would not last long.

  2. "The Wannsee Conference was entirely responsible for the Holocaust" How valid is this assessment ...

    going to kill those within the general government without deportation to the occupied Soviet Union. I don't think the decision to murder the Jews was made at the Wannsee Conference, however I do believe that the Wannsee Conference was used as a way of trying to make a decision as

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work