• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far was Britain's declaration of war in 1914 a consequence of her ententes with Russia and France?

Extracts from this document...


COURSEWORK ASSIGNMENT PART B (c 1500 words) How far was Britain's declaration of war in 1914 a consequence of her ententes with Russia and France? Whether Britain's involvement in the World War I was complete consequence of her ententes with Russia and France is debateable as there were various other factors influencing the war. Diverse historians believe that it was due to the ententes that Britain declared war. In 1904, the Entente Cordial was signed between Britain and France, and shortly in 1907, the Triple Entente signed Russia, France, and Britain together uniting them in case of war. Many historians have suggested that Britain entered into the ententes due to the rising apparent 'power' of Germany. It seems to reveal that the British seemed to have forced themselves into an entente with France due to the economic and industrial pressure, which Germany had indirectly placed on her. This emphasises the fact that Britain seemed to take the Germanic threat seriously enough to push her into the ententes with France and Russia, so why then would she not fully back up her allies against her rivals, ultimately suggesting that the British where wholly prepared to attack her antagonists by signing the ententes in 1904 and 1907. ...read more.


Thus showing the vulnerability of the entente and that Britain considered herself to be aloof from Russia and France. When it seemed that the Germanic power was threatening the British dominance, the fear and insecurity seemed to be highlighted in the British people, press, and media. P. Hayes (Modern British Foreign Policy-The twentieth century 1890-1939) states 'Britain became involved because it was the consensus of opinion that her interests and the balance of power were threatened by Germany'. The introduction of the British naval rule were set to safeguard the British from any threats as a world power, but as a clear defiance to this the Germans launched the Weltpolitik in 1897, threatening Britain. It is implied that Britain joined the ententes due to her self- interests; to defend her colonies against her rival- Germany, as the alliance system between France, Russia, and Britain surrounded Germany shifting the balance of power, blurring temporarily the prospects of war. The increasing fear of Germany is illustrated in a memo by the German Ambassador in December 1904, 'up till now England has maintained no fleet in home waters equal to the German one'. Again the British fear, and anxiety is depicted by Robert Wolfson and John Laver who state that '...Britain were considerably alarmed by Germany's expansion in the late nineteenth century'... ...read more.


were too terrible to contemplate'. The conclusions in which various historians have concluded vary at different lengths. Particular historians will claim that France and Russia was the main reason for why Britain declared war in 1914 but certain historians will state that various other factors influenced Britain's decision for war. However, selected historians believe that other factors are equally important as the ententes in Britain's declaration of war. One can only speculate that if the ententes were not signed would there have been war in 1914 or go on further to convey that would Britain be in the war. With or without ententes the situation in Europe was reaching a breaking point, a point in which a war would perhaps have shattered the 'peace'. As numerous historians have, the balance of evidence for both aspects of an argument can be tilted. Due to this when viewing historic sources one must be sceptical of the true message of the source, as it may be concealed. To conclude, various historians believe that the declaration of war is not solely a result of her ententes as other factors influenced it. By looking at the situation in Europe whether the ententes were signed or not there would have been an outbreak of war. Therefore, war was not a complete consequence of the alliance systems. TEMITOPE FATUROTI TEMITOPE FATUROTI ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why And How Did Britain Survive The War From 1940-1943

    (This number may have been exaggerated). Although Hitler's tactic was good for the RAF it was a disaster for the people as the bombs were often dropped quite indiscriminately on the cities and major centres of population.. But if the Blitz had not begun the RAF would have been defeated and if that had happened then

  2. In 1915 a British Newspaper printed a letter from a 'Lady Reader' who claimed, ...

    War, pointing at everyone with the words, "Your King and Country Needs You!" (Left) Another say "Women of Britain say 'Go!'" (Right). The government also released propaganda posters which showed how evil the Germans were. For example, in the poster that says "How the Hun Hates".

  1. Total War, Britain during the Second World War

    The Blitz had much more devastating effects than the government was prepared to admit. This is part of an official report describing the situation in the East End of London in September 1940. It gives a completely different picture of the effects of the Blitz from the official line.

  2. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    They took most of the important decisions. * The Assembly had representatives of all the members and it meant once a year. * Covenant was the agreement which members had to sign. It was a set of rules, which included not using force to settle a disagreement with another country.

  1. How And Why Did Britain Survive The War From 1940-1943?

    and the dilution of German troops across such a large area left the country without much of an army in the West. Should Germany be defeated in the east, which it was by the Soviet Union, then it would be the turning point of the Second World War in which Germany would find itself close to defeat.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Two days later, the small Maronite village in 'Akkar, Beit Mellat, was tacked again by Palestinian gunmen who went on the rampage, destroying property, killing several people. Further confrontations took place in the region, notably an attack on the Christian town of Qbayyat in 'Akkar many of whose inhabitants served in the Lebanese army.

  1. How Stable Was the Tsarist Autocracy in 1914?

    Economic transformation was also taking place in the towns. Liberals say that industrialisation would take time, and as the economy grew then conditions would improve. They say this is typical of early modernisation and after a certain period of time wages and conditions would ameliorate.

  2. How did the War change life in Britain?

    In 1917 it decided to plough an extra two and half million acres of land. The amount of land used for farming increased from eleven million acres in 1914 to fourteen million acres in 1918. However, many farm workers had joined the army, and so much of the work on

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work