• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far was Edward IV responsible for his own deposition in 1470?

Extracts from this document...


How far was Edward IV responsible for his own deposition in 1470? Edward, The Earl of March's assertion of his claim to the crown in 1460 was the key rise of the conflict known as the Wars of the Roses. When his father, Richard, Duke of York was killed at the Battle of Wakefield, Edward inherited his throne. With the support of his older cousin, Richard Neville, Earl of Warwick, Edward defeated the Lancastrians in succession to battles. While Henry VI and his militaristic queen, Margaret of Anjou, were campaigning in the North of England, Warwick gained control of the capital and had Edward declare himself King in London in March 1461. Edward strengthened his claim with a decisive victory at the Battle of Towton in the same year. He defeated and scattered the forces of his opponents, Henry VI. Edward had proclaimed himself King Edward IV, the first Yorkist king. The usurper had made reality of his power and the Lancastrian army was virtually wiped out, he had now secured his kingship with victory in battle and successfully ended Lancastrian opposition to his regime. Edward ruled rather more effectively than his predecessor for nine years until he was overthrown in 1470, however, it was not his enemies but his friends who were responsible for this. ...read more.


Edward's uncle, Viscount Bourchier was made Earl of Essex and Steward of the royal household. Warwick believing that he could continue to rule through Edward pressed him to enter into a marital alliance with France. Edward then alienated Warwick by secretly marrying Elizabeth Woodville, widow of Lancastrian sympathiser who, in fact, had been fighting in favour of the Lancastrians. As well as this, they were of a lesser nobility and she also brought her extended family into the royal family this eventually led them to claim patronage. The Woodville family had dominated the marriage market since the Earls of Arundel, Essex and Kent married their heirs to Woodville wives. Edward's brothers, George and Richard were the only great men left for Warwick's daughters but Edward did not allow this. Elizabeth's son married Anne Holland, the heiress of the Duchy of Exeter but Warwick's nephew however had been arranged to marry her. This led to the final split between Edward and Warwick. Warwick had been negotiating with Louis XI, the king of France to marry Bona of Savoy, the king's sister-in-law. This was intended to prevent a Lancastrian alliance with the French and therefore the Yorkists would gain French support. ...read more.


This time they were defeated and forced to flee to France. There, they made an alliance with Margaret of Anjou, and Warwick agreed to restore Henry VI in return for French support in an invasion, which took place in late 1470. This time, Edward was forced to flee when he found out Warwick's brother, John Neville, had also switched to the Lancastrian side, making his military position untenable. Henry VI was restored to the throne. This was the only time in English history that a King had been deposed and later restored. Edward is to blame for his deposition. The end of his reign was to some extent inevitable. Edward established a powerful regime and there seemed little chance of Henry VI regaining the throne but the fact that Henry VI and his family had escaped and still had power in the north definitely led to Edward's predicted deposition. On the other hand, Edward's weakness was his gullibility of confidence. He should have executed Henry VI when he had the chance to, instead of lodging him up in the tower of London; this was Edward's first mistake. Additionally, Edward should have been more aware of Warwick's ambitious nature which later led the Lancastrians to victory and resulted in his own deposition. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Was there a mid-Tudor crisis during the reigns of Edward VI and Mary I ...

    The quality of Mary's I reign has often been criticized by traditional historians like A.F. Pollard who stated that the regime was weak and unproductive, however this can be argued and there is little doubt that central and local government remained in control throughout the reigns of Edward and Mary,

  2. Was Charles I responsible for his execution?

    It could be possible that there was a minority of supporters for the King because they believed in Divine Right as well. The issue of the monarchy's popularity is quite important. If the monarchy was not popular in Charles' reign then it could have been that Parliament had to execute Charles because that's what the people wanted.

  1. How far & to what extent was Louis responsible for the turn of events ...

    The resentment among the workers of France about their social betters only added to the problems in France. The king was attached to the aristocracy, and combined with the free spending of his wife, Marie Antoinette, the system looked unfair indeed.

  2. "Why, despite having been his closet supporter in 1461, was Richard Neville, Earl of ...

    Warwick was rewarded handsomely for his continued support, given titles and territories such as Captain of Calais, admiral of England and constable of Dover Castle, all of which were very important (and powerful) posts. He was by far the mightiest of Richards subjects, however he lacked the monopoly of Royal power that he yearned for, as royal patronage was (rightfully)

  1. Hop Picking In Kent.

    The 1874 Sanitary Acts Amendment Act allowed local authorities to pass by-laws and a model code was provided by the local government board. The code came with a �5 penalty for farmers breaking the code and a further 10 shillings a day.

  2. Within the context of the period 1337-1471, to what extent can Henry VI be ...

    of the realm entirely on the Royal Council?, and as a result ?the fragile rule of law in England fell apart?. The quarrel between the Nevilles and the Percies soon escalated into violence in August 1453, despite measures that the Royal Council put in place in a failed attempt to end their quarrelling.

  1. How Successful was Edward Carson in His Defense of Unionism During The Third Home ...

    (Stewart, 1997, p. 57) It can be said that the words that Bonar-Law used would have fanned sectarian tensions in Ulster. Carson would have been furious with this as the violence that irrupted from July 1912 was intense. Carson needed to portray a disciplined, united front.

  2. To what extent did Edward IV restore royal authority in the years 1471-83?

    even if their property was empty, as well as fines (from court) to bump up his salary. Tied with the fact he was a businessman himself and that he used customs revenue, he was bringing in a respected wage. Edward was a much better king for bringing in money rather than giving it away.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work