• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far was Martin Luther King's leadership responsible for the gains made by the civil rights movement in the years 1955 - 1968?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐How far was the leadership of Martin Luther King responsible for the gains made by the civil rights movement in the years 1955-1968? By 1968, there had been significant gains made by the civil rights movement due to a number of different reasons. These do include Martin Luther King?s leadership style and his philosophy towards peaceful protesting however other reasons such as the Federal government and the shift of public opinion can be argued to be equally important. Most importantly, however, is the role of other civil rights organizations aside from King?s SCLC such as C.O.R.E, S.N.C.C, and the N.A.A.C.P. I will be arguing that without the crucial gains made by these organizations, King would not have had anything to apply his leadership to, alongside the fact that there would not have been enough support for the movement as a whole, as we notice through the joint collaborations between these organisations. Martin Luther King undoubtedly played a major role in the campaign. His great strength was his ability to inspire. Despite these strengths, he was a diverse figure and received heavy criticism from the other organisations which hindered his support towards the gains made for the movement. During his leadership of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference Martin Luther king organized a variety of peaceful protests in the war for civil rights. ...read more.

Middle

This led to the media using the campaign as clear evidence of America?s Corruption and Soviet Superiority. Kennedy was therefore forced to act and show his support for a bill that would once and for all end segregation. This was vital as it demonstrated the President?s public commitment for a civil rights bill. President Kennedy also opposed the March on Washington because he was afraid that it would become violent and jeopardise support for civil rights legislation but the march remained peaceful showing support for the civil rights legislation. His support may not have been as strong as it could have been. He had promised in his campaign speeches to act swiftly if elected. The 1960 report by the Civil Rights Commission made it very plain in clear statistics just how bad discrimination had affected the African American community. Regardless of his promises, in 1961 Kennedy did nothing to help and push forward the civil rights issue. International factors meant that the president could never focus attention on domestic issues in that year. He also knew that there was no great public support for such legislation. President Johnson was seen to mainly oppose the movement until the Civil Rights act of 1964 ended segregation once and for all. This is demonstrated through Johnson?s refusal to involve the government in the Chicago Freedom Movement as he was no longer willing to work with King following his attack on the Vietnam War. ...read more.

Conclusion

To conclude, many historians and I believe that other organisations such as the NAACP played the most important role in regards to the gains made by the civil rights movement. Martin Luther King was highly charismatic and a gifted orator who could convey the injustices of segregation to a national audience. He was a leader. He was highly responsible for the media coverage and increase in public support for the movement. However, the fact that King was very highly criticized from all corners of the movement combined with failures such as The Albany Movement and bad decision making such as the highly significant tactical mistakes made throughout the Chicago Freedom Movement of 1966 leave us unable to consider him, or the SCLC, the main reason for the gains made by the movement in the years 1955 ? 1968. It is clear that without the legal battles won by the NAACP, there would have been no chance of de facto change, which would have made it significantly harder for the movement to progress. This supports the point that although it may not be the direct reason for the gains made, the gains would not have been able to take place without the efforts of the NAACP combined with the rulings of the supreme court that eventually, led to real, de facto change within the civil rights movement. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Assess the view that the Supreme Court was the most important branch of federal ...

    4 star(s)

    As previously mentioned, this prompted Franklin D Roosevelt to issue an executive order to ban segregation within federal employment - and this included within the armed forces.

  2. Peer reviewed

    To what extent were Malcolm X and the subsequent Black Power Movement the 'Evil ...

    4 star(s)

    This, like Garvey's vision of a mass migration 'Back to Africa', was an ideal that would be hard to achieve partly because of logistical problems and primarily due to the limited amount of support the separatist factions had. "Only about 15 percent of blacks labelled themselves separatists."31 Malcolm X however,

  1. Revision notes - the USA 1945 to 1980

    in Congress, from the people and the opposition to the war in Vietnam. The biggest problem for Johnson was the cost of the war, which, after 1965 came to cost nearly 20 billion a year, and which drew money away from his Great Society programme.

  2. Linguistic Study - Linguistic Analysis of Martin Luther King's 'I Have a Dream', and ...

    The personal pronoun 'I' is used to express his own personal views (that he is happy to be there) and later on in the speech, his ideas and dreams. It also shows power, in that he is the one who is speaking.

  1. The question that will be investigated is, to what extent was the case of ...

    A limitation of the book is the bias the authors have in denouncing Brown v Board of Education. All of the authors share the same viewpoint and only provide commentary and statistics supporting their claims. The omission of facts shows a bias towards their thesis of Brown v Board of

  2. Rosa Parks and her significance to the Civil Rights movement.

    The Highly disturbing Emmett Till murder could be seen as the spark of the rebellion and like many other African-American, Rosa Park was the one to make the first move to do something. Certainly, the murder was in the back of her mind as she took on the rebellion to give up her seat on 1st December 1955.

  1. How far did the Supreme Court hinder rather than help the development of African ...

    In the 1930's Scottsborough case, the Supreme Court rules that past decisions had been unlawful and intervened.

  2. What was the short term impact of the Montgomery Bus Boycott 1955-1957?

    In addition to the increased violence the African Americans faced, the events that occurred after the Bus Boycott were not impacted by it and could be seen more significant than the Bus Boycott in progressing in Civil Rights. This can be shown in 1961 from the Freedom Rides; it can

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work