How far was Richard III responsible for his own downfall?

Authors Avatar by pseudonymegg (student)

How far was Richard III responsible for his own downfall?

One reason for Richard’s downfall was the presumed murder of the princes resulting in Richard losing legitimacy. Richard’s accession to the throne from 26 June 1483 was only possible due to the disappearance of his nephews Edward V and Richard, Duke of York, and so his usurpation led to lasting suspicions about his role in the disappearance of the two princes, as Richard had both motive and opportunity to remove his rivals. By autumn 1483, Elizabeth Woodville was apparently prepared to support a challenge to Richard III by Henry Tudor, the leading Lancastrian claimant to the throne who was currently in exile in Brittany: a plan she would not have backed without excellent reason to believe her sons were already dead. Many others also turned against Richard following the proposed atrocious murders, including such loyal Yorkists as Hastings who was even an enemy of the Woodvilles.

Join now!

Another reason for Richard’s position being undermined was his decision to alienate many nobles by favouritism towards Northerners. He used Northern nobles to control areas in the South where he was not liked- ‘plantations policy’. He trusted these nobles but here lost any support of those who considered those lands to be their right.

While Richard was liked in the North; proven by his success on his progress especially in York, he never adequately reconciled himself to those in the South and as a result, the opposition which grew during July and August 1483 became stronger and more widespread. ...

This is a preview of the whole essay