• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far was Richard III responsible for his own downfall?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far was Richard III responsible for his own downfall? One reason for Richard?s downfall was the presumed murder of the princes resulting in Richard losing legitimacy. Richard?s accession to the throne from 26 June 1483 was only possible due to the disappearance of his nephews Edward V and Richard, Duke of York, and so his usurpation led to lasting suspicions about his role in the disappearance of the two princes, as Richard had both motive and opportunity to remove his rivals. By autumn 1483, Elizabeth Woodville was apparently prepared to support a challenge to Richard III by Henry Tudor, the leading Lancastrian claimant to the throne who was currently in exile in Brittany: a plan she would not have backed without excellent reason to believe her sons were already dead. ...read more.

Middle

reconciled himself to those in the South and as a result, the opposition which grew during July and August 1483 became stronger and more widespread. Sometimes there were uprisings and Richard?s companion Buckingham defected to lead them. The mistake of Richard was great here in losing what should have been a loyal friend. Blame could be placed on the murder of the princes, or that Buckingham was not sufficiently rewarded for his role in the usurpation. Whatever the reason Richard was to regret it as although his rebellion was crushed and Buckingham executed, many leading Yorkists such as Giles Daubeney fled to join Henry Tudor after this debacle. Moreover, Tudor learned valuable lessons from Buckingham?s mistakes wich lead to his ultimate success such as where to land (near Milford Haven in ground that would support him.) ...read more.

Conclusion

Despite Richard?s attempts to repress and punish those who repeated slanderous rumours with help from Southampton, Windsor and York, Henry Tudor began to appear as a more credible alternative for the throne. Another factor which supplemented Richard?s downfall was his impetuous charge to kill Henry Tudor personally at Bosworth which isolated him from his army which led to his capture and death. Before this, his greater experience at war meant it was in his favour. However , Richard?s lack of support from the nobility, illustrated by Lord Stanley?s last minute defection to Henry?s side, saved Tudor from Richard. Richard was consequently surrounded by Stanley?s men and his army put to flight. Finally, in the end, Richard?s unpopular decisions were to blame for his downfall. His usurpation resulted in such unpopularity that combined with the forces beyond his control and no attempt to allay the South resulted in his downfall at Bosworth on August 22 1485. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Examine the Degree to which Wolsey was responsible for his own downfall

    Wolsey's foreign policy was another factor to his downfall, his foreign policy was a vigorous one involving a constant shifting pattern of alliance. Wolsey's behaviour between Charles V and Francis I has been much discussed. Scarisbrick has argued that Wolsey always wanted peace and that there was an underlying conflict with Henry.

  2. Discuss Shakespeare's presentation of women in Richard III. Are they convincing characters?

    She is predicting that this is the height of her fortune- therefore the wheel of fortune is turning against her. At this point, her husband is alive, thus she has the means to imprison people, but the next time we see her, Act 2 Scene 2, she has lost her power as 'our King is dead.'

  1. How effective was Richard III as a king from 1483 - 1485?

    These were a few very powerful men scattered around the country whose support really mattered. This can be shown with the earl of Northumberland. Although he was instrumental in Richard's rise to power he wasn't given power over the North as he had expected, and was under the control of

  2. How far & to what extent was Louis responsible for the turn of events ...

    During the Reveillon riots, which were sparked by suggestions by the wallpaper manufacturer that costs were too high due to the wages of its workers, the rioters chanted "long live M. Necker" and "long live the king." The meeting of the estates general, a mere week after the Reveillon riots, was received with adulation by the Parisian bourgeoisie.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work