• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far was Stalin's success due to his political ability as opposed to the weaknesses of his rivals?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Eva Frauke G�hring History Mrs Simpson How far was Stalin's success due to his political ability as opposed to the weaknesses of his rivals? Joseph Stalin, leader of communist Russia from 1928-1953, succeeded in his rise to power due to mainly two factors, his political ability, as well as the weaknesses of his rivals. However, most achievements Stalin did are due to his abilities and his skills to treat people and play them out against each other, but certainly also the mistakes made by his rivals play a big role. Without those his success wouldn't have been possible. After Lenin's death in 1924, the question of his succession was unsolved. In his testament he criticised each of his closest colleagues. Trotsky was most likely to be Lenin's successor, since he had been his right-hand and already played a big role in the first revolution, whereas Stalin only played a minor role. "Stalin on the other hand, was seen as an administrator and a rather dull personality." 1However, clear was that he wanted to be succeeded not by a single person, but a leadership by the politburo. A power struggle for Lenin's succession began. ...read more.

Middle

Many of the party members owed loyalty to him. When the party grew, new party members who were poorly educated and politically na�ve came in. These were easy to manipulate. Stalin, who had the same background as most of them, he was from a poor family, used this to make them identify with and therefore support him. When Stalin was about to change his opinion to whatever seemed best to be in a key position and not to lose support, he proved his political abilities and his skills to "play on the people's fears and emotions"5, once again. Initially Stalin was more for the right side and allied with Bukharin, Tomsky and Rykov. They were for NEP, or private ownership and for "socialism in one country" rather than the left, who were for a widespread revolution and against NEP. Trotsky then openly attacked the economic policies. This criticism was unpopular in the Party and the chance was there to accuse Trotsky of factionalism, which banned the formation of any factions in the party and ensured party solidarity. Stalin didn't hesitate and took the opportunity. After also having moved against Zinoviev and Kamenev, they and Trotsky formed the 'United Opposition' that again Stalin was able to defeat through his previous actions and abilities, their attempt to fight back was too late. ...read more.

Conclusion

He was almost seen as a danger to the revolution and "someone who might betray for his own ends."8 The next great mistake he made was not to take any opportunities to stop or weaken Stalin. He did not debate Stalin and didn't even try to compete. He never made an attempt to respond to criticism. Trotsky often did not attend to important party meetings, due to illnesses. He did little to built up support and therefore had no support were it counted. Another important point in Stalin's success that was due to his rival's weaknesses was that Lenin's Testament was not published. This could have cost Stalin his job. But Zinoviev etc. were more concerned about Trotsky and since the testament damaged them all they agreed not to publish it. Trotsky again did not speak. And Lenin's fears about Stalin weren't paid attention to. In conclusion, Stalin's abilities as well as the weaknesses of his rivals were important in the power struggle and Stalin's success. The Politburo underestimated him and allowed themselves to appear as the opposition. Therefore they were in danger of factionalism and could easily be played and voted out. Stalin managed to appear as a moderator between the Left and the Right and knew how to appeal to people and could therefore play them out against each other. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    Theoretically a strong combination, it was in fact nothing of the sort. * It was not in fact an overall coalition, but a series of separate alliances, and even these links were not complete for there was no alliance between Britain and Austria.

  2. How far does Stalins position as General Secretary explain his success in defeating his ...

    Zinoviev described the NEP as 'a temporary deviation, a tactical retreat', suggesting the NEP could be used to get out of trouble from the backwardness of economic output from war communism. Stalin went on to link with Bukharin to form the 'duumvirate' to oppose Zinoviev and Kamenev.

  1. How far does Stalins position as General Secretary explain his success in defeating his ...

    - however he was easily defeated in the congress because of these 'Stalinist delegates': the people Stalin had appointed solely to build his powerbase. On the other hand, there were other factors to Trotsky's defeat. Zinoviev and Kamenev also held important power blocs in the congress that kept Trotsky at bay.

  2. Dizzy with Success - lenin and stalin

    Pump it out of them, wherever it is hidden...Don't be afraid of taking extreme measures. The Party stands four-square behind you. Comrade Stalin expects it of you. It's a life-and-death struggle; better to do too much than not enough...This is no time for squeamishness or rotten sentimentality."

  1. The two rivals who wanted to lead the communist party were Leon Trotsky and ...

    When Lenin described Trotsky in his Testament as the most capable member of the Central Committee it offended Zinoviev in particular, who regarded himself as the natural successor to Lenin. Of course, such things as personal animosities, jealousy and rivalry can never determine the outcome of broad historical processes.

  2. How far was Mussolinis ability to secure and increase his power in the period ...

    Italy, rather than resulting in the 600,000 soldiers killed in WWI; Mussolini gained a reputation for heading a party that was effective and decisive. Wishing to secure his power further, Mussolini pushed forward the Acerbo Law in 1923, resulting in the Socialist party showing further signs of weakness; it could

  1. How far was Mussolinis ability to secure and increase his power in the period ...

    This shows how opposition to the Fascist party was weak, and did not do enough to challenge Mussolini; this meant he was often unopposed, which led to him being able to increase his power. The weakness of Mussolini?s political opponents also allowed him to significantly increase his powers after becoming

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    So, despite the fact that Lenin also did things wrong, the people had demonstrated the opposite thing. Whereas the historians only have one opinion of Stalin, they believe he carried with the work of Lenin, and that he took things further.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work