• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far was the English Nobility (Over mighty subjects) responsible for the outbreak of the Wars of the Roses and the fall of the House of Lancaster by 1461?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far was the English Nobility ("Over mighty subjects") responsible for the outbreak of the Wars of the Roses and the fall of the House of Lancaster by 1461? The English nobility were the main factor for the outbreak of the Wars of the Roses and the fall of the House of Lancaster. The English nobility were often manipulating the King, for example the Duke of Somerset was only interested in himself, his position and wealth; adding to this wealth, Henry VI granted him Glamorgan in the Welsh marches. This created a feud between Somerset and the Earl of Warwick who joined forces with Richard Duke of York. The English Nobility were often competing for influence and power over the King, Somerset was a favourite of the King, and the granting of Glamorgan also caused a further feud with York because York was jealous for the King's favour. One piece of evidence to support this point is that Cade's rebellion in 1450 was not aimed at the King, but at his 'evil advisers' which means that the people thought the King was not making choices for himself but being pressured into making bad decisions. ...read more.

Middle

were also killed in battle. This made the war between the Yorkists and the Lancastrians worse as both sides wanted revenge. In 1458, the king demanded all feuding families to parade through the streets linking arms as a way of saying to the people that they were no longer at war in a 'Loveday'. However this reveals how desperate the king was to maintain order and how worried he was about feuds potentially destroying his kingdom. Henry VI had a problem. He gave out land, titles and money to his 'favourites' within the court which made others jealous, but Henry did this so much that he went bankrupt very quickly and proved rather unpopular with some high nobility. This created factions at court and individuals began to start personal feuds: Somerset and York, Somerset and Warwick (Richard Neville, Salisbury's son) and Suffolk and Humphrey Duke of Gloucester. Somerset and Suffolk wanted peace alongside the king, however, York, Warwick and Gloucester wanted to continue fighting against France. ...read more.

Conclusion

The nobles suspected they were attempting to place their 'illegitimate' son on the throne of England, making Somerset the most powerful man in England. After much tension building in both the Yorkists and Lancastrians due to blood being spilt and victories on either side, they fought the first battle at St. Albans in March 1455. The king did not fight for his side; he was supposedly sitting under a tree laughing away, watching the battle unfold. In conclusion to all the evidence gathered, the English nobility were mainly responsible for the outbreak of the Wars of the Roses and the fall of the House of Lancaster because of their manipulation of the king, their personal feuds and the battles of revenge for blood lost. However, king Henry VI also played a part in this outbreak because of his 'addiction' for royal patronage, having favourites within the court, failing in the war against France (losing all the land gained previously) and his insanity which led to his Queen leading the country. ?? ?? ?? ?? AS Early Modern History Laura Canning 304 Words: 888 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. TO WHAT EXTENT WAS HENRY VI'S INCOMPETENCE THE PRIMARY CAUSE FOR THE OUTBREAK OF ...

    It also encouraged his council as well as Margaret of Anjou to dominate parliamentary decisions. R.L Storey tells us 'Record of the meetings of the King's Council, indeed, do not indicate that Henry regularly attended its sessions.

  2. How far do you agree with Elton's interpretation of the roles of Somerset and ...

    Arguably, the effects of religious reform are harder to forecast than the effects of economic policy; therefore, it is easier to condemn Somerset as inept on the basis of his economic policies than it is on the basis of his religious reforms.

  1. How far does Somerset deserve his reputation as the Good Duke? (Somerset (then known ...

    cause of society's ill elsewhere' (Brigden.), the ultimate show of arrogance, allowing further bitterness from the Council towards him. As a protector and so called 'Good Duke' he seemed to have failed to make any effective progress. In terms of Religious Policy, it was under Edwards VI's rule, and so

  2. If only they could talk

    The book "If only they could talk" is the semi autobiographical of real life vet James Herriot. A book about a recently qualified Veterinary Surgeon hardly sounds like a great book, but in its own unique way it is somewhat wonderful.

  1. How far & to what extent was Louis responsible for the turn of events ...

    Louis, still desperate for funds, refused to admit defeat. Brienne attempted to bypass the notables and estates general by presenting the proposals to the parlements. At the same time, he staved off bankruptcy by taking out more loans (very hard to come by now) at massive interest rates. This failed, the parlement 'reluctantly' finding that it lacked the necessary authority to make the changes needed.

  2. Within the context of the period 1337-1471, to what extent can Henry VI be ...

    Gillingham, however, paints a very positive portrayal of Henry VI?s minority. He concludes that it was ?evidence showing that in fifteenth century England there existed a stable political system, containing in the council an institutional framework within which tensions could be contained and resolved.? K.B.

  1. How far were Richard of York's ambitions responsible for the outbreak of war?

    As well as this Richard of York was definitely an over mighty subject. York was a blood relation to the royal family, a descendant of Kind Edward III and the owner of a vast estate that stretched across England! He was the heir apparent, which gave him advantage and means

  2. How far was the outbreak of the civil war in 1455 due to the ...

    Because of these suspicions, York returned early from Ireland in 1450 to clear his name. He also made his first bill of complaint to Henry, outlining his fear of attainder, his position as heir apparent and unpaid debts. When Henry imprisoned Thomas Young in 1451 for proposing that York was

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work