How far was the leadership of Martin Luther King responsible for the gains made by the Civil Rights movement in the years 1955-1968?

Authors Avatar by topcat51 (student)

How far was the leadership of Martin Luther King responsible for the gains made by the Civil Rights movement in the years 1955-1968?

Martin Luther King was of course a prominent member of the Civil Rights movement. However it can be argued that his leadership – though effective – was only partly responsible for the gains made by the Civil Rights movement in the years 1955-1968.

During his leadership of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference Marin Luther King organized a variety of peaceful protests in the war for Civil Rights. One of such was the Montgomery bus boycott done in conjunction with the NAACP where Martin Luther King encouraged a peaceful solution raised through civil disobedience. His leadership in this matter was heard and protest remained peaceful all through his time as leader as the SCLC. Though King was sentenced to a year in prison – which he only served two weeks of – the Montgomery bus boycott helped bring the Civil Rights movement to media attention and highlighted the effectiveness of King’s policies.

However it must be noted that King wasn’t the only leader that the Civil Rights movement had to be proud of, and as such he couldn’t be afforded all the successes of other campaigners. For example the Little Rock Campaign detailing the prevention of black students from enrolling in Little Rock due to white racists was undertaken by the NAACP and taken to court. In 1959 a court ruling was successfully passed that allowed both white and black students to enrol in Little Rock schools. This was undertaken without King and as such his leadership is not a factor that affected this civil rights gain.

Join now!

There were also several mistakes by King that also hinder the statement that it was his leadership that made him responsible for the gains of the Civil Rights movement. The Poor People’s campaign in Chicago was disastrous in terms of organisation with many unprepared for the cold, harsh weather in the north. King also made a number of demands that were considered completely outrageous by President Johnson. As such, although he won the support of many labour unions, the campaign was handled very poorly and that was due to in large part to poor leadership on King’s part.

...

This is a preview of the whole essay