• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far was the personality of Nicholas II responsible for the instability in Russia in 1904? (24 marks)

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far was the personality of Nicholas II responsible for the instability in Russia in 1904? (24 marks) Nicholas II's personality was responsible for the instability in Russia in 1904 as he was unfit to rule as Tsar. Nicholas was unprepared to rule when Alexander III became unexpectedly ill at a young age in 1893. Nicholas was still in the army and he was still unmarried. Nicholas therefore only had a mere year of preparation before becoming Tsar on Alexander's death in 1894. Nicholas himself even expressed concern at his lack of preparation. Nicholas was also poorly educated and his main interests were hunting and military ceremony. In addition, Nicholas was unintelligent, possessed poor judgement and indecisive. Being indecisive is a serious failing in an autocrat; for the indecisive implementation of policies and actions serves to weaken the Tsar's power and his ability to control events. As a result of this Nicholas was only able to apply his father's repressive policies in a feeble matter. ...read more.

Middle

Also, changes in Russia created a new class of opponents against the Tsar's autocracy. During Nicholas's reign, Russia was rapidly industrialising. This rapid industrialisation created a new class in Russia which was the urban workers. The emergence of urban workers undermined the Tsarist rule. This was because the urban workers lives in squalid conditions in the quickly-built city slums which made then develop grievances that motivated then to become discontent with Tsarist rule. Moreover, the urban workers had greater opportunity than previous generations of Russians to reorganise themselves in common action against the Tsarist government. This was because they were concentrated together in factories and housing estates from which they could much more easily mobilise strikes and protests. These strikes and protests of the urban workers also had a greater impact on the Tsarist government because the workforce lived in cities like, for example, Moscow, where the Tsarist government was physically situated. The peasantry was also unhappy about the rule of the "Mirs." The Mirs were councils of elders set up in some parts of Russia which decided at a local level how land and the common land should be allocated to the peasants. ...read more.

Conclusion

Therefore, increases in population were greater than increases in the food supply leading to famines, starvation and poverty. Repayments of debts for the peasantry's freedom from serfdom also crippled the peasantry and made them angry. It was this poverty which breeds revolutionary activity which caused problems for the Tsarist political system. In conclusion, there were many contributing problems for the Tsarist political system in 1904 which led to the instability of Russia. Long term economic problems were causing problems, and the stories of working class wealth and social welfare systems which told from the west only showed the Russian people what they were missing. The Tsarist political system itself was collapsing and falling apart due to its inefficiencies and due to crime and terrorism. All this as well as the Tsar himself caused the instability of Russia. However, I think that the factor that contributed the most was the fact the Europe was becoming modern and more democratic with more people gaining political rights and the Russians political system remaining the same as the gave people a motive as to be unhappy with their government. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * But statistics from this time are notoriously unreliable. * What the Five Year Plans do show is that political fervour took over from rational thought. It was almost a Civil War-type crusade to build socialism overnight. * There was great enthusiasm amongst many Party members who made huge sacrifices to build new towns and factories.

  2. Describe the Russia that Tsar Nicholas II inherited

    The Tsar repressed his political opponents, and used the secret police force, the 'Okhrana' to tackle extremists. "Between 1883 and 1903, Russian troops were used 1500 times to suppress local unrest" - John Etty. Nicholas II had inherited a government whose structure as a regimental, hierarchical, and rigid autocracy was not suitable to modernise.

  1. Describe the Russia that Tsar Nicholas II inherited

    Alexander II began to crack down on the revolutionaries with violent force resulting in further discontent. This culminated with his assassination by the Narodnaya Volya (People's Will) movement in 1881 and the ascension of Alexander III to the throne. Having seen what happened to his father when he tried to

  2. How secure was the Tsars power up to 1904

    Although, as we have seen, Alexander was known at the early part of his reign as the 'Tsar Liberator", the reforms did not go far enough. The first part of his rule was a time of unique intellectual activity in Russia with the emergence of great Russian writers such as Dosteoyevsky.

  1. How far did Russia undergo economic and political modernization from 1881-1905?

    He didn?t know whether to industrialize so he could keep up with countries such as Germany and Britain. However the disadvantage of industrialization and modernisation would mean he might have to delegate some of his power. The Russian economy was also unable to advance as it had a poor banking

  2. How far were the divisions among its opponents responsible for the survival of Tsarist ...

    Both splits however used political channels and also street protests and demonstrations to get their views across. These divisions meant that each opposition group?s strength alone was not enough to achieve their own specific goals and even though the groups did have some tactics such as propaganda in common, it was not enough.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work