• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far was the transformation of the position of the Bolsheviks from February to December 1917 a result of Lenin's leadership?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far was the transformation of the position of the Bolsheviks from February to December 1917 a result of Lenin's leadership? In February, the position of Lenin and the Bolsheviks was precarious. With Lenin out of the country and the Bolsheviks not even a part of the Soviet, they were very much on the fringe of politics. Membership was low and with the declaration of the Provisional Government and the Petrograd Soviet, dual authority over Petrograd had been established. The Bolshevik party accepted this, (they thought it was part of a genuine revolution) but it was Lenin who would reject it and begin a process to destroy it, his ultimate aim being to replace it with his Bolshevik party, which happened in October. Historians such as Liberals and Soviets agree that the role of Lenin himself was of huge importance in transforming the position of the Bolsheviks, saying he was a skilful manipulator of situations. ...read more.

Middle

The lack of much needed reforms made these people turn to the soviets, and ultimately to the Bolsheviks. However, these new members didn't actually ensure a transfer of power to the workers, as in the chaos of all the new members, politicians managed to seize power in the soviet; therefore the workers were not being sufficiently represented. The Bolsheviks aimed their propaganda at these kind of desperate people, seemingly offering them a way out. Overall, Lenin had little control over this situation, but his skilful strategies discredited the Provisional Government and the party made substantial gains in the numbers of supporters. It has been suggested that the 'July Days' crisis shows the weaknesses of the Bolsheviks, and in contrast, the strength of the Provisional Government. While after the event Lenin claimed that the uprising actually stemmed from the Mensheviks and SRs, this is probably just to detract from the fact that they were associated with a failed uprising. ...read more.

Conclusion

Kerensky later acknowledged that the affair had been the 'prelude to the October Revolution', and from it Lenin could see how the Government was defenceless against military threat. In this way, Lenin's leadership appears to be a considerable factor in the changing fortunes of the party, as he was slowly undermining Kerensky by playing on his inability to stop the social unrest in Petrograd and profiting from it. Here, social factors are clearly a large issue, as well as the way Lenin was able to exploit the situation. This ties in with revisionist and liberal views, as both aspects are merged. Although great importance must be placed on the social situation that Lenin was in, so must the fact that Lenin was cleverly able to manipulate many situations, from which he and the party gained much support. Although revisionists tend to underestimate the amount of support for the Bolsheviks, they did actually profit from exposing the weaknesses of the Provisional Government and from the Kornilov affair. Therefore, the revisionist view must be accepted. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. HOW DID WORLD WAR ONE CONTRIBUTE TO THE TRANSFORMATION OF IRISH POLITICS 1914-1918?

    Infiltration of the Gaelic League by the IRB along with the influences of Patrick Pearse and Socialist James Connolly played a major role in what became the Easter Rising. The involvement of Roger Casement and Clan na Gael in America with Count Bernstorff saw a promise of German recognition of Ireland as a Republic.

  2. How effective were the Bolsheviks between 1903 and February 1917?

    Lenin developed a powerful revolutionary weapon by adapting Marxism to suit Russia, which had not developed enough to be ready for revolution based on the original Marxist theory. As a result of these adaptations, the Bolsheviks would not collaborate with the bourgeoisie, which further divided them from the Mensheviks who

  1. Did Kerensky hand over power to the Bolsheviks?

    Lvov returned to Kerensky and told him Kornilov was demanding Kerensky be removed from power and a military dictatorship be formed, obviously Kornilov had said nothing like this but Kerensky believed Lvov despite other members of the Provisional Governments suggesting that he should speak personally to Kornilov.

  2. How far was the transformation of Bolshevik position between February and October 1917 a ...

    He wanted to shut down the soviets and replace the Provisional Government with military rule. Kornilov failed because of the armed resistance of the Petrograd workers led by the Bolsheviks. This showed the weakness of the government and many saw the Bolsheviks as the way to a stable government.

  1. The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

    It is clear that Lenin could indeed go on to use his powers of argument, his vast understanding and ferocious determination to overthrow or at the very least disturb the fragile Provisional Government of Russia. b) Explain why Lenin and the Bolsheviks replaced the Provisional Government as leaders of Russia by November 1917.

  2. Explain the importance in relation to other factors, the role of Lenin in the ...

    He was very confidant and an outspoken leader. These are the reasons that Lenin's personality, conviction and status in society were the main reasons why so many were drawn to him. Lenin was seen as the undisputed leader of his party. Many defined Bolshevism as a personal pledge to Lenin where Mensheviks to a lesser extent by those who opposed him.

  1. How far do you agree that WW1 was mainly responsible for the February Revolution ...

    Russia, depleted its already ravaged economy and generated much grief throughout the country. By Christmas 1916 15.3 million Russians had experienced military service. Humiliating defeats throughout the war such as the battle of Tannenberg had resulted in the death of 1.6 million men with just under 4 million men being wounded.

  2. The Bolsheviks were able to seize power in October 1917 mainly because of the ...

    the help of a battleship pointing its guns at the winter palace the provisional government surrendered. In conclusion I agree with the statement that the main reason the Bolsheviks seized power was due to the weakness of the government. I believe that the weakness of the Provisional Government allowed the Bolsheviks to use their strengths in order to gain power.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work