• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far was there economic and political stability in Germany in the years 1924-29?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far was there economic and political stability in Germany in the years 1924-29? After the turmoil of 1918-23, liberal constitutional democracy survived in Germany up until the disastrous Wall Street Crash of 1929. These years become known as the "Golden Years" of the Weimar Republic and, thus indicate that some levels of economic and political stability were shown through the rebuilding of Germany as a country between 1924-29although on shaky foundations in terms of security. This was significantly due to the friendlier attitude of the Allied powers, through foreign loans and investment from the Dawes Plan and the high level of political ability and standing shown by Gustav Stresemann through the Rentenmark introduction and Foreign Policy of Fulfilment. Gustav Stresemann was ultimately the key figure in ensuring the introduction of some economic and political stability in the aftermath of the previous crisis 1918-23, through his high level of political skill and standing. When Stresemann came to power, Germany was in turmoil; with deadlock in the Ruhr, runaway inflation and threats of insurrection in many parts of Germany. ...read more.

Middle

However, although the Dawes Plan did seriously improve Germany's economic standing, the improvements were introduced through the help of the USA and other allies. I therefore don't believe that the stability was as strong as it could have been, if Germany had improved their economic problems by themselves because, if the USA demanded their money back Germany would be back in a bad state again. Stresemann's Rentenmark intervention also helped to stabilise the Germanys economic condition during the 'Golden Years'. Stresemann and Luther (the Minister of Finance) recalled the old inflated bank notes and replaced the 'mark' with the Rentenmark. In the absence of sufficient gold reserves, the new currency was backed by a mortgage on Germany's agricultural and industrial resources. It was a novel and rather shaky form of security, which relied heavily upon foreign goodwill for its acceptance. Such goodwill and friendliness was forthcoming as a result of Stresemann's settlement of the Ruhr crisis. This not only allowed for the currency to be stabilised, but also re-opened negotiations on the question of Germany's reparations payments. ...read more.

Conclusion

After the turmoil of 1918-23 it was evident that somebody needed to restore political and economic stability within Germany. To some extent Stresemann achieve this through his political skill and ability resulting in him being one of the most important factors in causing the stability. However, although the policies that he negotiated and introduced were successful in terms of increasing political and economic stability , they seriously lacked security which was a big problem. The Dawes Plan, Rentenmark Introduction and finally the foreign policy of fulfilment all heavily relied on either foreign investment e.g. USA 800 million gold marks from the Dawes Plan or, good will from the Allies themselves in terms of the Rentenmark introduction and treaty of Locarno. So, although stability was secured during 1924-29 if relations worsened between Germany and the allies, this stability could easily almost be instantly removed and result in Germany being no better off than they were before the 'Golden Years' of the Weimar. Stresemann didn't allow this to happen which is why I prioritised him as the most important factor in ensuring the stability stayed secure. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Hitlers Germany

    An obvious instance of this is the synthetic fury, which he could assume or discard at will, over the treatment of German minorities abroad. When it was a question of refusing to listen to the bitter complaints of the Germans in the South Tyrol, or of uprooting the German inhabitants

  2. Despite it all too obvious political and economic failings, in terms of its society ...

    A number of intellectuals wasted no time in airing their views publicly. They gathered in the Reichstag on the same day the Weimar was proclaimed and demanded the abolition of all academic institutions and the nationalisation of all theatres, they declared, "Art should be brought to the people, and the world should be changed through art."

  1. How far has nationalism changed over the last hundred years?

    Mussolini was forced to act through pressure from leading fascists at the time. The mere suggestion led, even Mussolini to doubt its success, as he had already booked a train ticket to Switzerland for the aftermath he believed would occur: failure.

  2. How stable was the Weimar Republic 1924-29 ?

    of production as it was during the First World War which looked promising. Overall the economy was shaping and rising up making the stability of the government stable and strong. Yet even though the reparations were reorganized, they still caused a great national resentment as the Germans thought they were

  1. AS Level Edexcel History Spain 1931-33 Revision Notes

    made many of them join the Nationalist cause in 1936. Agrarian reforms Minister of Labour, Largo Caballero, made reforms designed to address problems with rural workers ? especially in the south. He established: * 8-hour days and introduced overtime pay * Wage disputes were settled by mixed committees of labourers and landowners.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    The private enterprise part meant that some people were making a profit out of other?s labour. This went against the principle of public good and of Socialism. 2. Economic divisions meant class differences increased: the new bourgeoisie were formed (these people were enemies of Socialism).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work