• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far was there economic and political stability in Germany in the years 1924-29?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far was there economic and political stability in Germany in the years 1924-29? After the turmoil of 1918-23, liberal constitutional democracy survived in Germany up until the disastrous Wall Street Crash of 1929. These years become known as the "Golden Years" of the Weimar Republic and, thus indicate that some levels of economic and political stability were shown through the rebuilding of Germany as a country between 1924-29although on shaky foundations in terms of security. This was significantly due to the friendlier attitude of the Allied powers, through foreign loans and investment from the Dawes Plan and the high level of political ability and standing shown by Gustav Stresemann through the Rentenmark introduction and Foreign Policy of Fulfilment. Gustav Stresemann was ultimately the key figure in ensuring the introduction of some economic and political stability in the aftermath of the previous crisis 1918-23, through his high level of political skill and standing. When Stresemann came to power, Germany was in turmoil; with deadlock in the Ruhr, runaway inflation and threats of insurrection in many parts of Germany. ...read more.

Middle

However, although the Dawes Plan did seriously improve Germany's economic standing, the improvements were introduced through the help of the USA and other allies. I therefore don't believe that the stability was as strong as it could have been, if Germany had improved their economic problems by themselves because, if the USA demanded their money back Germany would be back in a bad state again. Stresemann's Rentenmark intervention also helped to stabilise the Germanys economic condition during the 'Golden Years'. Stresemann and Luther (the Minister of Finance) recalled the old inflated bank notes and replaced the 'mark' with the Rentenmark. In the absence of sufficient gold reserves, the new currency was backed by a mortgage on Germany's agricultural and industrial resources. It was a novel and rather shaky form of security, which relied heavily upon foreign goodwill for its acceptance. Such goodwill and friendliness was forthcoming as a result of Stresemann's settlement of the Ruhr crisis. This not only allowed for the currency to be stabilised, but also re-opened negotiations on the question of Germany's reparations payments. ...read more.

Conclusion

After the turmoil of 1918-23 it was evident that somebody needed to restore political and economic stability within Germany. To some extent Stresemann achieve this through his political skill and ability resulting in him being one of the most important factors in causing the stability. However, although the policies that he negotiated and introduced were successful in terms of increasing political and economic stability , they seriously lacked security which was a big problem. The Dawes Plan, Rentenmark Introduction and finally the foreign policy of fulfilment all heavily relied on either foreign investment e.g. USA 800 million gold marks from the Dawes Plan or, good will from the Allies themselves in terms of the Rentenmark introduction and treaty of Locarno. So, although stability was secured during 1924-29 if relations worsened between Germany and the allies, this stability could easily almost be instantly removed and result in Germany being no better off than they were before the 'Golden Years' of the Weimar. Stresemann didn't allow this to happen which is why I prioritised him as the most important factor in ensuring the stability stayed secure. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Hitlers Germany

    It is this mixture of calculation and fanaticism, with the difficulty of telling where one ends and the other begins, which is the peculiar characteristic of Hitler's personality: to ignore or underestimate either element is to present a distorted picture.

  2. Despite it all too obvious political and economic failings, in terms of its society ...

    The fundamental problems that were apparent within Weimar society started to infect and spread throughout Bauhaus ideology. It became a battleground for conflicting ideas of progress. The vigour with which each new concept was greeted at the expense of its predecessor ultimately weakened and crippled the Bauhaus initiative.

  1. How far has nationalism changed over the last hundred years?

    Obsession also leads to insecurity and instability, according to Orwell where the country becomes paranoid of any military developments by their rivals. The Weltpolitik, and later "Mitteleuropa" (a form of dominating Europe by controlling a customs system), was an obsessive attempt to make Germany the all-powerful European nation and a clear example of nationalism.

  2. AS Level Edexcel History Spain 1931-33 Revision Notes

    Because of the attack on the Church the government was further split. The Prime Minister and Minister for Home Affairs resigned in protest ? this meant that their the government leant even further more to the left and assisted in radicalisation.

  1. How stable was the Weimar Republic 1924-29 ?

    short-lived coalitions as most did not have a secure majority in the Reichstag meaning instability was caused in the country. In November 1928, the SPD government ministers voted with their party against their own government which was proposing the funding of a new battleship which showed that the parliamentary government was a charade.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Children denied education. 3. 1928 ? many given hard labour. 4. Had their property confiscated. This showed how far the Party were willing to go in order to achieve their main goal: socialism. Kulaks did not like this as they were benefiting greatly from the half-Capitalist, half-Socialist policy that was the NEP.

  1. How accurate is it to suggest that the Treaty of Versailles was mainly responsible ...

    still had to pay for the majority of it, as well as trying to get their own country to recover. After the war, the German economy was already in a bad state, with many forms of industry completely destroyed. Therefore, Germany knew that it was going to struggle to pay

  2. How accurate is it to suggest that Treaty of Versailles was mainly responsible for ...

    The treaty was notably created under a ?diktat?, as Germany were not invited to any of the negotiations, which sparked further frustration within society as Germans were branded with the ?war guilt clause?, accepting full responsibility for the conflict. Overall, we can see that the Treaty of Versailles laid the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work