• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far was Truman personally responsible for the development of the Cold War?

Extracts from this document...


How far was Truman personally responsible for the development of the Cold War in Europe to 1949? The Nazi-Soviet Pact of 1939 and Potsdam of 1945 had left the Soviets looking less than trustworthy in the eyes of the Americans. However, the East was not solely to blame. Leading up to 1949, many events seemed to impair Truman's public image. The Iron Curtain Speech in 1946 was the first open attack on communism. From here, the West had two reasons to continue an attack. Firstly, their expectations of a counter attack from Eastern Europe, especially since the atomic bomb had been showcased for all to see (and steal) in 1945. Secondly, after an open attack, they had to follow up with evidence, and subsequently prepare themselves for the worst case scenario. Now that growing communism posed a threat to vital US interests, Truman was struck with the prospect of the US standing alone against a hostile world. Since the new Republican Congress seemed determined to stand by their policy of isolationism, Truman argued that this would be giving ammunition to communist propaganda and appeasing the opposition would be repeating the conditions of the 1930s. He also claimed that failure to defend Greece and Turkey from this threat could lead other countries 'to fall like apples in a barrel infected by one rotten one'. ...read more.


Stalin hoped that this way he could isolate a position of strength to negotiate from and simultaneously change West Germans opinion about the extent of the US's will and ability to aid them. However, Truman did not back down. Adopting the British idea of an airlift, 2.3 million tons of goods to feed and provide Berlin were flown in from June 1948 to May 1949 when Stalin finally backed down. By this time Stalin realised his plan had backfired, bringing about the very things he sought to avert. West German opinion had consolidated against him. The creation of NATO in April 1949 was a continuation of the Truman Doctrine, serving to ensure a stable, strong democracy in Europe. In conjunction with NATO other structures were born based on the experience of the Marshall Plan and, with US encouragement, the process of Europe's assimilation began. It was amidst these political conditions that a West German state was founded in May 1949. If the Cold War did not begin before the Truman Doctrine, it is likely the events after it were highly significant in causing friction or triggering an actual start. Traditional historians are of the view that the imposition of aggressive Soviet expansionism on an unwilling Eastern Europe catapulted the balance of power into a Cold war. Revisionist historians argue that the Cold war was an inevitable result of conflicting American and Russian interests, that US policy of containment as expressed in the Truman Doctrine was at least equally responsible, if not more so, than Soviet seizure of Poland and other states. ...read more.


After all, the USSR was equally deserving of aid because of their joint effort and losses in World War II. Nevertheless, it was a counteract-balance situation where if the West pushed, the USSR would counter. In addition to this, misperceptions were a feature of Cold War reasoning, and both sides underestimated the others' genuine apprehension. In conclusion, I feel that there have been many incidences that could have sparked off a war at any time, but the point is it did not. At this time, it wasn't a Cold War as such, but more tension, and build up of future events to come. Each side expected a level of muscle flexing. At any time, threat of termination was countered with a defensive act that would ultimately lead back to the equilibrium that suited them both. However, I feel that it wasn't until the development of the atomic bomb by the Russians in 1949 that lead to the beginnings of the Cold War. America no longer had the upper hand, and fear of 'meeting their match' may have been a short term cause for the declaration of the NSC-68, which took a more aggressive view on communism. It looked to 'roll-back' communism, 'enforcing' that they were successful. This in my opinion, is the beginning of the Cold War, and it was the Truman Doctrine (as well as other key events) that simply speeded up the arrival of the conflict in the 1940s. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. How far was the USSR responsible for the outbreak of the Cold War?

    buffer zone in Eastern Europe, but she also in trying to gain influence in Turkey and the Middle East, such as Iran. In the case of Soviet focus on Turkey, a strong Western reaction pushed Stalin to back off and thus pressure for concessions alleviated.

  2. To what extent was Hitler solely responsible for the Holocaust

    For example, the Philosopher Paul de Lagarde, whom regarded Jews as 'vermin' and that there was a need to 'remove the source of the infection'. 11 By the late nineteenth century, despite the fact they were less than 1% of the population many regarded the Jews as a problem.

  1. Who was responsible for the start of the Cold war?

    He saw the immediate post-war period as a power vacuum, the economies of central and Eastern Europe now lay in tatters, their people looking for a new direction and to be lead out of the void they now existed in.

  2. 'The Truman Doctrine of 1947 marked the real beginning of the Cold War.' How ...

    It was also announced at a time when Britain could no longer fund the civil war in Greece, and geographically this was huge threat to Europe. Greece was not an island, and once communism had devoured the people there, what was there to stop it from spreading all over Europe?

  1. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    Their party regarded industrial growth and capitalist leadership with approval, believing that they led to an ever-widening opening of opportunity for all. Grover CLEVELAND rose from obscurity to become Democratic governor of New York in the early 1880s and then U.S.

  2. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    Yet the history of the two countries suggested that principle was far more a consideration in the formulation of American foreign policy, while self-interest-purely defined-controlled Soviet actions. The difference became relevant during the 1930s as Franklin Roosevelt attempted to find some way to move American public opinion back to a spirit of internationalism.

  1. Why did communism collapse in Eastern Europe?

    It also shows how weak communist rule in East Germany really was. It was this event that sealed East Germany's fate as the USSR realised that in a united Germany, the Communists would lose control. Events eventually culminated with the building of the Berlin Wall which was the ultimate expression

  2. Assess the reasons for the development of the Cold War

    Stalin was angered that the USA had just used an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, unbeknownst to him ? the possession of such weapon gave the USA a huge military advantage, something which Stalin was arguably jealous of. On the other hand, Stalin had invited non-communist Polish leaders to meet him

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work