• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far were economic problems responsible for Stalins decision to replace the new economic policy with the first Five Year Plan?

Extracts from this document...


How far were economic problems responsible for Stalin?s decision to replace the new economic policy with the first Five Year Plan? When Lenin brought in the New Economic policy in 1921 it was met by stiff opposition within the party due to its difference from communist ideological policy, however the NEP played a key part in revitalising the soviet economy and dealing with some of the severe famine affecting the country at the time. However by 1928 with Lenin dead and Stalin in power Stalin saw a different economic policy was needed to progress Russia. It is true that the economy was a major influence for a change in polity but there were also a number of other social and political motives for bringing in the Five Year Plan. Firstly it is important to remember that although the NEP had helped it had made little difference in modernising the Soviet economy and they still relied heavily on agriculture for their produce. ...read more.


Another economic failing of the NEP was that under the policy, the production of steel, copper and iron never rose above Tsarist levels. The reason many saw the NEP as a success was because they simply saw that between 1921 and 1925 Russian industry grew massively, with imports increasing nine-fold. However what Stalin saw was that in 1921 the base was so low that almost any policy could have achieved these improvements. Stalin?s knowledge of industry was poor and he believed that industry meant heavy industry. These low figures for what he saw as the building blocks of the economy worried him and he knew that if Russia was to become self-sufficient, which was the end goal, then he needed to increase the output and efficiency of heavy industry. . Although there were obvious improvements in Soviet Industry under the NEP, with consumer goods increasing hugely leading to a happier middle class, to Stalin the ...read more.


The NEP encouraged elements of capitalism creating the NEPmen, a new class who benefited from the system after 1921. Ideologically many ion the left of the party saw this as ideologically wrong that anyone should benefit, yet there was little fuss while the economy improved yet by 1928 it was becoming stagnant and Stalin saw this as a perfect opportunity to attack the NEP for benefiting some over others, the opposite of what a communist should encourage, this gained him huge political support and effectively removed Bukharin from the leadership struggle Furthermore Stalin also benefited politically in another way. Under the NEP Lenin had lost some of his power over Russia, with many business leaders gaining power and appearing to dictate some policy due to telling Lenin how to run his economy. Stalin dint want this, he saw that under nationalisation of all industries he could control the production of individual goods, ensure that production levels were met ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. What were the effects of the First Five Year Plan on Russia?

    In the factories targets were frequently not met and produce was of poor quality. The reason why the workers were not getting as much food as they should have been getting is because of a change in the method of agriculture and farming in the country.

  2. To what extent was Hitlers rise to power due to Economic Problems?

    and above all the simultaneously nationalist and law-abiding legal profession, to support precisely those totalitarian aims which some of them at least were trying to avert. Hitler later stated that it was his intention "to seize power swiftly and at one blow" Those who tried to oppose were slaughtered by the Stormtroopers.

  1. How successful were Stalin's economic policies?

    There was a high level of absenteeism which showed that not all workers were won over by the slogans or propaganda of the party. Not all workers were willing; the government often used slave labour to complete large projects and this workforce often experienced even worse conditions than the ordinary worker, with many dying due to their conditions.

  2. Identified within this study is the argument that whilst many of Lenin's theories and ...

    Both Lenin and Stalin were ruthless with their people and would stop at nothing to push the revolution forward, with the similarities between Stalin's secret police used against Trotskyists and Lenin's treatment of Mensheviks in 1922 illustrating this: both Trotsky and the Mensheviks being forced out of Russia in comparable circumstances.

  1. How far did the achievements of Stalin's economic modernisation programme justify the costs?

    The main area focused on was armaments and defence with the increasing out look of the USSR being invaded. The other problems with the third five year plan were the shortage of qualified and experienced workers for the Gosplan because many had been killed due to the Purges.

  2. How far was Stalin's personality responsible for the purges?

    power, as Stalin had demanded that critics of him should be arrested and executed, whilst Kirov argued against this policy. When the vote was taken, the majority of the Politburo supported Kirov against Stalin. This shows that Stalin had reason to be worried, and that as his policies were being

  1. How far did Russia undergo economic and political modernization from 1881-1905?

    This was for many reasons such as the elite upper class wanted things to stay the same in order to maintain the status quo. They also wouldn?t have wanted a big working class as this could lead to a revolution, they also didn?t want a large middle class out of fear that they would take some power away.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    There were lots of strikes in the 1920s: 1. Workers were paid badly. 2. Although workers had the right to ask for wage rises, they were rarely given them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work