• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far were economic problems responsible for Stalins decision to replace the new economic policy with the first Five Year Plan?

Extracts from this document...


How far were economic problems responsible for Stalin?s decision to replace the new economic policy with the first Five Year Plan? When Lenin brought in the New Economic policy in 1921 it was met by stiff opposition within the party due to its difference from communist ideological policy, however the NEP played a key part in revitalising the soviet economy and dealing with some of the severe famine affecting the country at the time. However by 1928 with Lenin dead and Stalin in power Stalin saw a different economic policy was needed to progress Russia. It is true that the economy was a major influence for a change in polity but there were also a number of other social and political motives for bringing in the Five Year Plan. Firstly it is important to remember that although the NEP had helped it had made little difference in modernising the Soviet economy and they still relied heavily on agriculture for their produce. ...read more.


Another economic failing of the NEP was that under the policy, the production of steel, copper and iron never rose above Tsarist levels. The reason many saw the NEP as a success was because they simply saw that between 1921 and 1925 Russian industry grew massively, with imports increasing nine-fold. However what Stalin saw was that in 1921 the base was so low that almost any policy could have achieved these improvements. Stalin?s knowledge of industry was poor and he believed that industry meant heavy industry. These low figures for what he saw as the building blocks of the economy worried him and he knew that if Russia was to become self-sufficient, which was the end goal, then he needed to increase the output and efficiency of heavy industry. . Although there were obvious improvements in Soviet Industry under the NEP, with consumer goods increasing hugely leading to a happier middle class, to Stalin the ...read more.


The NEP encouraged elements of capitalism creating the NEPmen, a new class who benefited from the system after 1921. Ideologically many ion the left of the party saw this as ideologically wrong that anyone should benefit, yet there was little fuss while the economy improved yet by 1928 it was becoming stagnant and Stalin saw this as a perfect opportunity to attack the NEP for benefiting some over others, the opposite of what a communist should encourage, this gained him huge political support and effectively removed Bukharin from the leadership struggle Furthermore Stalin also benefited politically in another way. Under the NEP Lenin had lost some of his power over Russia, with many business leaders gaining power and appearing to dictate some policy due to telling Lenin how to run his economy. Stalin dint want this, he saw that under nationalisation of all industries he could control the production of individual goods, ensure that production levels were met ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How successful were Stalin's economic policies?

    of his past and the views expressed by Lenin in his testament. He also purged senior members of the NKVD when he believed them to know too much about his actions. However, all these purges came after the original Shakhty Trial, which was enabled as a result of Stalin's economic policy.

  2. What were the effects of the First Five Year Plan on Russia?

    building the factories and working in them were all forced to work and most of them from Labour or Prison Camps. The main effect of this was that the workers were not trained in what they did and many of the buildings and products made were not of high quality.

  1. To what extent was Hitlers rise to power due to Economic Problems?

    After the war, many historians (particularly French writers) believed that it was too soon to write an objective account of Hitler (Lukacs, interestingly, rejects the very terms 'objective' and 'subjective', instead he believes that, since an historian's tools are words, which have to be chosen, 'his selection of every word

  2. How far was Stalin's personality responsible for the purges?

    and had a policy of giving 'space' for Germans in Eastern Europe, suggesting it was the USSR that Germany would fight. Stalin felt the need to remove anybody who might oppose his foreign policy and interfere with his war plans, and also anyone, like Kirov, who disapproved of the pace

  1. How far did the achievements of Stalin's economic modernisation programme justify the costs?

    Overall the economic situation after the interruption of the third plan was even more chaotic with shortages and wastes. The whole three five year plans were known as the 'planned economy' this phrase is a entirely misleading as there was very basic planning if any.

  2. To what extent were economic considerations the main motive for Portuguese exploration and empire ...

    This could further suggest that Economic considerations of Portugal was a more powerful and important motive for Portuguese exploration and empire building than the Religious factors. This factor also closely links in with another. Political factors Political rivalry with Castile could have also been considered as a motive for Portuguese

  1. How far did Russia undergo economic and political modernization from 1881-1905?

    This was for many reasons such as the elite upper class wanted things to stay the same in order to maintain the status quo. They also wouldn?t have wanted a big working class as this could lead to a revolution, they also didn?t want a large middle class out of fear that they would take some power away.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    However, instead of being enthusiastic, workers became increasingly disillusioned with the bid to become a Socialist country. Workers boycotted factory committee elections and trade unions, and unemployed workers protested ï many arrests. However, the authorities would not admit that they were to blame, as that would be saying Stalin was wrong.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work