• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far were the socio-economic policies of Stalin aimed towards the modernisation of Soviet Russia?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Stalin was under a growing amount of pressure from the deadlines of the five-year plans, he needed desperately to find a quick solution, collectivisation seemed like a way, not only to stay on track with the deadlines, but it seemed like a way to modernise the economy. Making peasants work collectively for little or no profit as a unit seemed like a more efficient way to generate economic growth. Collectivisation was said by historians such as Robert Conquest to be 'unjustifiable', however there is a bias that Robert is not Russian and is writing over 40 years later. It is clear that collectivisation did achieve at the very least, hope for the success of the five-year plans, a secure grip on communism and a rising productive efficiency. Foreign invasion was feared by Stalin but was becoming very common, Stalin wanted to ensure the safety of the USSR by increasing agriculture. Stalin needed food for his soldiers and he needed a source of income, he used collectivisation to produce copious amounts of food which could be traded to other countries. Although the results of collectivisation were violent and it has now been estimated that ten million peasants and Kulaks died. ...read more.

Middle

Stalins reasons for the cultural revolution derived from the popularity of communism, nomral people were not excited by communists dreams and Stalin felt that he needed to gain the support of the average Russian. Many would argue that Stalin was driven by the desire to remain in a role of leadership, the cultural revolution was a way of gaining support from the peasants who were the overwhelming majority and populated most of Russia. Stalin attempted to sell the communist dream and present himself as a good trusted man, he made numberous advertising campaigns, statues, paintings and all forms of art were made according to Stalin's guidence. He intended to present himself as a friend of Lenin and consequently Stalin wanted to use Lenin's popularity to boost his own. The purges however did little to modernise The Soviet Union, there is more convincing evidence to infer that the purges hindered the modernisation of The Soviet Union. Many top government officials were murdered and the country was broken into anarchy, this was a real concern for modernisation and seemed to be doing the opposite of modernising. Stalin did however create various labour camps, not all of the prisoners were executed, many had to work on these camps. ...read more.

Conclusion

Stalin also used the purges as an attempt to eliminate any threats to communism or to Russia itself. There is alot of dense evidence suggesting that Stalin policies were influenced by his desire to remain leader, he cleverly plotted the five-year plans to secure his leadership and he used the image of Lenin to boost his own popularity, Stalin executed anyone who became too progressive or prosperous and blamed problems on them. This is the most significant reason why Stalin's polcies seemed to be aimed towards keeping the leadership, he executed thousands claiming that all of them were plotting against him. However i believe that the most convincing evidence shows Stalin's policies to be directed at modernising Russia, Stalin created three sets of five-year plans which were all directed at improving the quality of Russian life, he intended to modernise Russia and even though his policies were not always correct the results cannot be ignored. Stalin made Russia into a superpower and allowed them to compete with the USA in the space race. Alec Nove writes that Stalins achievements were important despite the human cost. The most important reason why i believe that Stalin's policies were aimed at modernising Russia was that he used collectivisation, to try and unite and increase productivity despite the views of the people. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    Why did famine break out in 1932? * Grain production fell because peasants saw no reason to produce for the state. Kulaks destroyed their grain rather than hand it over. * What grain that was produced was collected for the towns and export. In the Ukraine especially - the main grain producing area of the Soviet Union - there was a great famine in 1932-34.

  2. Lenin and his Achievements.

    Again I do not completely agree with this quote. This is because Lenin did bring temporary peace by coming out of World War I, but then there was a civil war in Russia. During this civil war again there was no peace. He did bring some prosperity to the people with his NEP policy, but all throughout the civil war the people were starving and living in horrible conditions.

  1. How successful were Stalin's economic policies?

    After seeing the initial success of the first Five-Year Plan, Stalin increased targets, therefore putting more pressure on factory managers to achieve greater output. However, the chaotic implementation and planning of the plans meant this was not possible and limited further growth.

  2. How did Stalin manage to secure power in Russia by 1929?

    Stalin reiterated this by stating that socialism would be unattainable on a global scale as there was very little support from countries worldwide to create socialist or communist societies. Having highlighted the political, economic and social problems that Russia had just suffered, Stalin argued, that it made it impossible for

  1. "Stalin transformed the Soviet Union from a backward country into a strong modern state ...

    The USSR was well on its way to being on level footing with international superpowers as far as industry and import/export was concerned. The overall increase in production in both industrial and agricultural sectors inevitably came at a price. The effects of Stalin's policies on the people of the USSR were profound.

  2. How far did the achievements of Stalin's economic modernisation programme justify the costs?

    they met targets even if this was untrue; this led to the system showing that it was working where in fact this was not the case. The scapegoat for these shortcomings was the 'bourgeois specialists'. They were accused of deliberately holding up supply and causing breakdowns.

  1. To What Extent was Stalin's Personal Paranoia the Main Reason for the Purges?

    Lenin had himself also implemented a few tamer versions of Stalin's terror, yet Leninism only suggested such extremes as the Purges, Stalin turned these suggestions into gospel. The Purges can also be seen as logical in another sense, not that they follow on from the logic of Bolshevism, but that

  2. How far did government policies change towards agriculture in Russia in the period 1856-1964? ...

    Collectivisation meant that the State would manage agriculture directly and would help facilitate for the destruction of kulaks and the crushing of their culture; or De-Kulakization. With the threat of a counter-revolution, kulaks were now seen as ?class enemies? ? any individuals resisting collectivisation ran the risk of being branded

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work