• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Far Were the Soviet People Better off in 1941 than 1928?

Extracts from this document...


How Far Were the Soviet People Better off in 1941 than 1928? The Soviet Union suffered a huge amount of Russian lives through 1928-1941. However this great cost was to be outweighed to how superior the Russian state was from 1941 and onwards, having a huge amount of stable resources and in addition having enough food to feed its people and to export grain. I firmly believe that Russia as a country came out of 1941 as a superpower and it was much better off than in 1928; however this had caused millions of Russian lives. In the Soviet Union many people were in a better position than they had been in 1928. However entire classes had been made extinct and many individuals were worse off under the new communist regime than they had been in the late 19th century, early twentieth. In the 1920's the Soviet Union had just come out of a bloody civil war so therefore the NEP (National Economic Policy) had been instated. The peasants had their own bits of land and could sell the excess grain that was left from what the government required. This way of life had created a new class of rich pheasants called the Kulaks who had large pieces of land and had poor pheasants working for them. ...read more.


For instance one city, 'Magnitogorsk' was an industrial city for Iron Ore extraction and the making of Iron. Another 'Tankigorsk' was a city mainly built for producing tanks, they were so efficient that at one point they were making a tank per minute! A great benefactor for Russia was that throughout the period of the severe depression in the Western countries, where there was mass unemployment and food shortages. Russia was flourishing. There was no unemployment! The USSR was completely self efficient with everyone having a part to do for there country. This again was communism in action, where the people were working for a greater Russia and everyone living the same standards of life. While the workers worked long shifts they still felt they were doing something for their country. Picking the old backward Russia and making it a super power. Also women were involved; in many countries at this time women were known to just stay at home and clean the house and look after the children. However the Russians used the women as they were using their men. Many women were having children and having a job at the same time. They were also given benefits for doing this, free day care etc. Also the workers were being given new housing in the new cities. More schools and hospitals were being built for them. ...read more.


Clubs, sports facilities etc. were provided by the state. The state also controlled the cinema, radio etc. but an emphasis was placed on educating yourself via the media as it was then. So therefore I believe that as a whole Russia was better off in 1941 than it had been in 1928 as the country did become a major industrial nation by 1939 and her progress was unmatched in the era of the Depression in America and Western Europe where millions were unemployed. Those workers who did not offend the state were better off than under the reign of the tsar. Russia's military forces were benefiting from her industrial growth. However millions had died in famine after the failed experiment of collectivisation. Russia's agriculture was at the same level in 1939 as in 1928 with a 40 million increased population, (the amount of food being produced in 1928 was not a great deal, so therefore with a 40 million population increase there would be future problems). Many groups/classes had been persecuted or wiped out completely because they did not 'fit in' with the communist way of life. Also 25 million Russian lives had been sacrificed in the Second World War but Russia as a state had survived the invasion, while her people were left for dead. So thus, a minority of Russian civilians benefited significantly during the 13 years while most of the Russian lives stayed the same if not worse. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did Stalin Emerge as Leader of Russia by 1929?

    Stalin was the main figure at the helm for the members joining via the Lenin enrolment, so it was not surprising that a solid bastion of support for him was found within this intake of enthusiastic new Bolsheviks.

  2. What were the causes of the disintegration of the Soviet Union as a socialist ...

    growth in the region of 6%, mainly based upon the exploitation of the nations' labour supply, which had been both cheap and plentiful. In the 1980's, it was becoming apparent that this type of growth was exhausted. Unfortunately, the sustained economic growth was one of the reasons that support existed for the communist party.


    * Industry needed a clear plan, this could only be done on the basis of guaranteed food supplies for the cities, and guaranteed income from food exports. * Collectivisation, it was argued, would make it easier to control the peasants - they had always been a conservative force, and a limiting factor in Russian economic growth.

  2. How far did Kennan's ideas actually shape US policy towards the Soviet Union?

    Besides lacking the military and industrial power he prized, he also noted that the immediate post-colonial period in the Third World was not conducive to real cooperation. He sustained that "anti-white and anti-American feelings were widespread," and would prevent any meaningful "partnership" with the West.

  1. Journalism - Two generations of the journalists - Soviet and the post-Soviet - make ...

    The process of professionalisation of occupations is presented as one of general dimensions of "modernisation" - the advance of science and cognitive rationality and the progressive differentiation and rationalisation of the division of labour (Parsons 1954, Goode 1960, Polanyi 1957).

  2. The Hollywood Ten - House Un-American Activities Committee.

    Video/C 999:737 * Nothing Sacred (1937) * Laura (1937) Video/C 999:678 * Woman of the Year (1942) * Cloak and Dagger (1942) Video/C.999:282 * Forever Amber (1947) * Cincinatti Kid (1965) * M*A*S*H (1970) Video/C 999:438 * The Greatest (1977) John Howard Lawson John Howard Lawson had an exciting life before becoming a screenwriter and a playwright.

  1. In the light of the documents, critically analyse the success of the transformation of ...

    in addition, it would maintain and encourage the existence of a group of wealthy farmers, made rich by private enterprise: this would be a severe ideological embarrassment to a regime committed to the ending of private ownership. Stalin understood that farmers would not accept the collectivisation in a voluntary way

  2. Assess the impact of War Communism and the New Economic Policy (NEP) on both ...

    It was a limited return to the cash economy with cash given rather than the ticketing system in place and private ownership of factories were allowed. Small business owners (Nepman) could purchase raw materials and sell their products but the state still had control of large scale heavy industries within its central planning regime.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work