• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Far Were the Soviet People Better off in 1941 than 1928?

Extracts from this document...


How Far Were the Soviet People Better off in 1941 than 1928? The Soviet Union suffered a huge amount of Russian lives through 1928-1941. However this great cost was to be outweighed to how superior the Russian state was from 1941 and onwards, having a huge amount of stable resources and in addition having enough food to feed its people and to export grain. I firmly believe that Russia as a country came out of 1941 as a superpower and it was much better off than in 1928; however this had caused millions of Russian lives. In the Soviet Union many people were in a better position than they had been in 1928. However entire classes had been made extinct and many individuals were worse off under the new communist regime than they had been in the late 19th century, early twentieth. In the 1920's the Soviet Union had just come out of a bloody civil war so therefore the NEP (National Economic Policy) had been instated. The peasants had their own bits of land and could sell the excess grain that was left from what the government required. This way of life had created a new class of rich pheasants called the Kulaks who had large pieces of land and had poor pheasants working for them. ...read more.


For instance one city, 'Magnitogorsk' was an industrial city for Iron Ore extraction and the making of Iron. Another 'Tankigorsk' was a city mainly built for producing tanks, they were so efficient that at one point they were making a tank per minute! A great benefactor for Russia was that throughout the period of the severe depression in the Western countries, where there was mass unemployment and food shortages. Russia was flourishing. There was no unemployment! The USSR was completely self efficient with everyone having a part to do for there country. This again was communism in action, where the people were working for a greater Russia and everyone living the same standards of life. While the workers worked long shifts they still felt they were doing something for their country. Picking the old backward Russia and making it a super power. Also women were involved; in many countries at this time women were known to just stay at home and clean the house and look after the children. However the Russians used the women as they were using their men. Many women were having children and having a job at the same time. They were also given benefits for doing this, free day care etc. Also the workers were being given new housing in the new cities. More schools and hospitals were being built for them. ...read more.


Clubs, sports facilities etc. were provided by the state. The state also controlled the cinema, radio etc. but an emphasis was placed on educating yourself via the media as it was then. So therefore I believe that as a whole Russia was better off in 1941 than it had been in 1928 as the country did become a major industrial nation by 1939 and her progress was unmatched in the era of the Depression in America and Western Europe where millions were unemployed. Those workers who did not offend the state were better off than under the reign of the tsar. Russia's military forces were benefiting from her industrial growth. However millions had died in famine after the failed experiment of collectivisation. Russia's agriculture was at the same level in 1939 as in 1928 with a 40 million increased population, (the amount of food being produced in 1928 was not a great deal, so therefore with a 40 million population increase there would be future problems). Many groups/classes had been persecuted or wiped out completely because they did not 'fit in' with the communist way of life. Also 25 million Russian lives had been sacrificed in the Second World War but Russia as a state had survived the invasion, while her people were left for dead. So thus, a minority of Russian civilians benefited significantly during the 13 years while most of the Russian lives stayed the same if not worse. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did Stalin Emerge as Leader of Russia by 1929?

    Stalin therefore had control of the party's information network. Stalin was able to decide whom to let into the party and what roles they would take on. Between 1923 and 1925 was the Lenin Enrolment, a major growth in

  2. What were the causes of the disintegration of the Soviet Union as a socialist ...

    There is little evidence to suggest that the media liberalisation was intended to do anything more than find a way to reform and update the existing Soviet system, rather than provide a platform from which it could be challenged. This seems to be more a disastrous unintended consequence, but still must be considered a reason for the systems collapse.

  1. The Hollywood Ten - House Un-American Activities Committee.

    McCarthy's wild charges did not help uncover Soviet spies. But there were spies, there was a legitimate security issue and there were very good reasons for suspecting that most of the spies were American communists. None of that excuses the excesses of McCarthyism, but it also puts the era of McCarthyism into context.


    Such was the response that new improved targets were set in 1929, and these again revised upwards in 1930. * It became crucial to meet your planned target. Never mind the quality, meet the target! Workers would move from job to job to get higher wages, managers would do anything

  1. In the light of the documents, critically analyse the success of the transformation of ...

    in addition, it would maintain and encourage the existence of a group of wealthy farmers, made rich by private enterprise: this would be a severe ideological embarrassment to a regime committed to the ending of private ownership. Stalin understood that farmers would not accept the collectivisation in a voluntary way

  2. How far did Kennan's ideas actually shape US policy towards the Soviet Union?

    Calling for America to choose its battles carefully, Kennan wanted the US to determine its spheres of interest and to defend only those interests which were most vital. For Kennan, that pretty much meant centers of military-industrial power, meaning Western Europe and Japan.

  1. Assess the impact of War Communism and the New Economic Policy (NEP) on both ...

    It was a limited return to the cash economy with cash given rather than the ticketing system in place and private ownership of factories were allowed. Small business owners (Nepman) could purchase raw materials and sell their products but the state still had control of large scale heavy industries within its central planning regime.

  2. Journalism - Two generations of the journalists - Soviet and the post-Soviet - make ...

    Definitions of profession The difference in the meanings of the term profession forces us to represent it in corresponding discourses: the western, the Soviet and post-Soviet ones. Although the western discourse itself embraces very different meanings of this term bringing those cultural and historical settings of the professions in that

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work