• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How great was the Great Reform Act?

Extracts from this document...


How great was the Great Reform Act? The effectiveness of the Great Reform Act, an act brought about in 1832 to increase the fairness and overall proportionality of the UK electoral system, can be judged on the variety of outcomes that the act produced. O one side of the argument, it can be said that the Great Reform Act, although did make some changes to the UK electoral system, does not deserve its title of “great”, because it made sections of the working class feel betrayed by the terms of the Act, leaving them feeling that they had hardly benefited from the whole thing. They thought that the fact that they (the working classes) were forced pay a yearly rental of £10 or more in order to vote- a uniform property qualification- was contradictory to the purpose of the reform itself- it ended up excluding, rather than including certain members of society, and showed why the self-proclaimed ‘liberal’ Tories may not have been so liberal after all. It was also mandatory for all voters to enlist in the army if they wanted to vote, something , although understandable given the time of the reform and the situation Britain was in, not very liberal and potentially very discouraging for men who felt like they wanted to vote. ...read more.


This reduction of the unfair boroughs meant that significant amounts of Tory voters were lost, therefore benefitting the Whigs all the more and increasing Whig popularity, this supplied Whig?s with the confidence to make more reforms, and did indeed help them properly secure power and helped them to implement vital reform to Britain in the near future. The abolition of the rotten and pocket boroughs also improved the fairness and reduced the corruption and omnipotence of wealthy aristocrats in the areas, as well as adding a degree of proportionality to the electoral system. The Great Reform Act can also in a way be seen as being ?great?, due to the fact that it actually helped reduce the chances of revolution at the time. Prior to the reform the middle-classes had rebelled and had threatened to not pay taxes in order to force the government into the passing of the bill. After the bill was made an act, the countryside then settled down and a revolution did not happen, therefore the Reform Act had shown great content for the population which in turn made Britain become more ?at ease?- the threat of an uprising had been greatly reduced. ...read more.


and the government implementing a requirement to be paying a minimum yearly rental of £10 and forcing people to conscript if they wanted to vote, the advantages were clear, and somewhat necessary. The Reform Act did not completely revamp the old system- however the changes that were made were certainly significant. The reduction of rotten/pocket boroughs and the 'redistribution' of proportionality helped increase the value of the vote, and at the same time satisfied members of society who were threatening revolt- it could be said that the reform prevented revolution, and the mandatory conscription did not have such an adverse effect after all- it meant that Britain now had a strong enough army to deal with any domestic/international threats. The Reform was also beneficial to the Whigs- it allowed to them to consolidate their support, leading to the introduction of new policies following shortly after the reform. Reform was much needed, and although the Great Reform Act of 1832 did not go all the way in completely changing the nature of the electoral system, it would be fair to say it allowed Britain to take the first big steps to breaking away from the shackles of the much out-dated, unjust old system, in which Britain had been encapsulated for so long. Thomas Smith ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Does Alexander II deserve the title of 'Tsar liberator'?

    Alexander accepted the fact that he needed to move Russia away from a totalitarian situation of the police and judiciary being controlled by the government, and as part of the liberation of the serfs, introduced a new judicial structure modelled on those extant in Western European countries at the time.


    * 1867 had created illogical arrangements which had no claim to 'finality' and which made further change irresistible. Chamberlain wanted to achieve some really radical advances. He needed to rally the Liberal Party after a quiet administration dogged by problems in Ireland and in foreign policy.

  1. Why was The Great Reform Act passed in 1832 ?

    Overall the Luddites and Swing Rioters achieved very little in the long run, only slowing down the introduction of machines in some areas and counties from the south. Their acts of vandalism were not unknown in the days before the Industrial Revolution but the main reason for these attacks had

  2. Why was the Great Contract of great significance

    He should not really of been spending money when Elizabeth I bequeathed to him �400,000 worth of debt to start with, so he was in debt before he even began to spend more money. S.J. Houston emphasises this point when he says, "The most crippling problem for James had to face was the insolvency of the crown".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work