• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

HOW IMPORTANT WAS DISAPPOINTMENT WITH THE GREAT REFORM ACT IN EXPLAINING THE RISE OF CHARTISM?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

HOW IMPORTANT WAS DISAPPOINTMENT WITH THE GREAT REFORM ACT IN EXPLAINING THE RISE OF CHARTISM? Chartism was a popular mass movement against the actions of the Whig government and the laws passed by post-Reform Parliament. One interpretation of this uprising was that it was a result of disappointment with the Great Reform Act, or more generally, the result of discontent with the political situation. Another interpretation is that it was more the social and economic factors which generated the level of discontent necessary for Chartism to take form. The Great Reform Act, although undoubtedly changing the landscape of British politics, did contain many elements of continuity: there was still massive over-representation in the South relative to the bigger industrial towns in the North, such as Manchester; ownership of property was still the basis for enfranchisement, meaning that the working classes were effectively excluded from the vote while the middle classes managed to gain enfranchisement; the landed classes still dominated Parliament. ...read more.

Middle

The great frustration caused by the Poor Law, then, is also a noteworthy political reason for the rise of Chartism. The harshness of the Whig government was also a reason for the rise of Chartism, and this was seen no more clearly than in the case of trade unions, specifically the Tolpuddle Martyrs. Upon the legalisation of trade unions in the Repeal of the Combinations Act 1824, many unions (unsurprisingly) began forming. However, as larger-scale and more permanent unions began to form, the government became worried, and determined to smother unionism. This can be seen in the excessively repressive nature of their action against six farm labourers from Tolpuddle, who were sentenced to seven years transportation for making illegal oaths when joining a trade union. This action led to both a rapid decline in trade union membership and government popularity. This type of political measure spurred on the masses to join the Chartist movement. Finally, the pre-1832 radical activity (e.g. Luddism) will have also contributed to the rise of Chartism. ...read more.

Conclusion

Finally, it was because of the poor economy (i.e. lack of trade) that unemployment increased vastly, which also led to the rise of Chartism. Without means of supporting themselves or their families, workers had a choice: starve or campaign. It is clear, then, that the economy and social factors also had far-reaching and large-scale impacts on the popularity of the Chartist movement. It may be most prudent to suggest that Chartism was a movement borne out of an amalgamation of both the political and socio-economic hardships of the popular masses (with the political hardships due in no small part to the poorness and insufficiency of the Great Reform Act): the Charter would allow the British people to gain more political power, and with this political power they could tackle the socio-economic problems they faced, such as hunger, unemployment and low wages, which fuelled the search for political power in the first place, thus eradicating this vicious cycle, in the hope of creating a fairer society. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Do you agree with the view that the main reason for the emergence of ...

    3 star(s)

    Finally Looking at source 6 I can see that it was published in 1994 by people,power and politics. It was written from Robert Ellis. The writer would have read many sources therefore they make have a biased opinion. Also all information may not be known.

  2. Interpreting the 1832 Reform Act, its origins and effects, has generated continuing debate among ...

    Parry may be exaggerating. He implies that Grey's administration had clear goals and complete control over the process of reform, and that ministers really knew how they were doing and how to do it when, in fact, much was uncertain and unpredictable.

  1. Why was The Great Reform Act passed in 1832 ?

    The riots then spread through Sussex, Hampshire, Berkshire and Wiltshire. Over these counties there had been around one hundred disturbances which spread over twenty-two counties in total. As against the Luddites the government reacted very harshly against the people involved in the swing riots; nine rioters were hanged, 457 transported and over 400 imprisoned.

  2. Reform Chartism

    and business interest- alliance between Whig aristocrats and middle class radicals- foundation of emerging Liberal party * Leadership, control of policy and social composition of MP's changed very little from 1832- 1867 Reform Act * Major aim of 1832- preserve influence of aristocracy over political process * Post 1832- old

  1. East of Eden: An Interpretation

    Aron Trask - Aron was steadfast in his morality and was disgusted by the filth of society, very much like his mother. But unlike Cathy, Aron would not have surrounded himself with anyone or anything against his beliefs. Aron's brother, Cal could be described as Aron's opposite.

  2. The changing position of women and the suffrage question. Revision notes

    Lords Cromer and Curzon were presidents of the Anti-Suffrage League. On the other hand, Lord Lytton (Constance Lytton?s brother) was president of the Men?s League for Women?s Suffrage and consistently supported female suffrage in the HoL. * In 1892 Arthur Balfour highlighted the contradiction in ?giving a vote to a

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work