• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How important was foreign support for Henry Tudor in explaining Richard III

Extracts from this document...


How important was foreign support for Henry Tudor in explaining Richard III's defeat at Bosworth? Richard III had proved to be a strong king. Richard had many strength such as crushing Buckingham's rebellion and taking Buckingham's heir as his ward after Buckingham was executed. He stopped Henry Tudor's initial invasion of England. Also by 1483 there was no more open opposition to him and the threat from the Woodville's was extinguished with many of them in exile and who ever was left was rendered powerless. After crushing Buckingham's rebellion he confiscated a huge by both Buckingham and the nobles who had joined his rebellion, this land he then controlled and used to reward those who were loyal to him and also gain capital from the lands by letting them out. Two years later half the peers of the realm were firm supporters of Richard III. So how was it that such a strong king was able to be defeated by someone who was foreign in the eyes of many? Henry Tudor's claim to the throne was very weak but then so was Richard III's. His grand-mother was the mother of Henry IV; this proved that he came from a line of royalty. ...read more.


When Henry Tudor was in France he did not know if h had any support for when he arrived so the men he had been given by the French king were extremely important as they were the ones who would help him defeat Richard III at the battle of Bosworth. He had 2000 foreign men accompanying him which is a very small army, however although his army was small he had the advantage or foreign mercenaries they had battle tactics learnt from the Swiss which gave him an advantage. Tudor planned on picking up support as he marched from Wales were he landed from France to Leicester where he met Richard III for the battle. Henry Tudor moved up the coast taking time to send messages to potential allies to build his numbers up it was important for him to do this because without the people joining his cause as he would not have enough men in his army and also if they didn't join him they may depose him as King once he kills Richard. Though foreign support was extremely important in gaining him entry into the country and enabling him to fight with Richard III at the battle of Bosworth he still needed more men in order to win. ...read more.


Gilbert Talbot and the influence from Sir William Stanley and Thomas Lord Stanley and the fact that the Stanley's joined in on Tudor's side instead of Richards played a key role in him winning the battle; thanks to all these men Henry Tudor was able to build up an army which lead him to victory at Bosworth showing that support from the country was a necessary and important factor for him to win the battle. However, without the help of France in the situation and the gifts that Henry Tudor received such as a fleet and 200 men with the methods of war that had not been seen in Britain so British soldiers would have found it hard to fight against them then he wouldn't have been able to get into the country. Also if France would have rejected him from his court to cause less trouble as they had their own problms with a young heir he would have been able to be captured by Richard III and wouldn't have been able to fight at the battle of Bosworth. This means that the foreign support being the initial factor was the most important factor in explaining how Henry Tudor defeated Richard III at the battle of Bosworth. ?? ?? ?? ?? History Essay India Scully ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain why Richard III was able to usurp the throne of England in June ...

    4 star(s)

    Richard was released from sanctuary with his mother to join his brother in the council. Now all of the possible heirs to the throne were under Richards control this included his brother George Duke of Clarence's son who was next inline after the princes.

  2. The Battle of Bosworth.

    He landed on the 7th of August. On his way to battle Henry built up his army with support from the welsh aristocrats. However, Henry's journey was overshadowed. Henry supposedly met with the Stanley's on the 20th o august, two nights before the battle.

  1. How effective was Richard III as a king from 1483 - 1485?

    extreme level of naked aggression, which shocked even the most hardened of hearts. Although all usurpations have a certain aspect of aggression and ambition, Richard alone isolated so many key groups and is essential the only failed, not establishing his dynasty successfully, usurpation in English history.

  2. How useful is a visit to the Tudor parts of Hampton Court to find ...

    Between the Great Hall and the Great Watching Chamber the Horn room lay, originally as a waiting room for servants bringing food up to both rooms, there staircase led up from the kitchens and today the Tudor oak steps still remain.

  1. Did Richard III lose the Throne, or did Henry Tudor gain it?

    The earl of Northumberland also brought 3,000 men but his loyalty to Richard was in doubt. Richard sent an order to Lord Thomas Stanley and Sir William Stanley, two of the most powerful men in England, to bring their 6,000 soldiers to fight for the king.

  2. Discuss Shakespeare's presentation of women in Richard III. Are they convincing characters?

    plot, and is largely to demonstrate Richard's brilliance as a manipulator of people, and this wooing of Anne seems to offer definitive evidence. His ability to persuade the grieving, better Anne to accept him as her suitor is proof of his skill in playing on people's emotions, and convincing them

  1. Henry IV of France

    Richelieu was five when his father died, leaving poorly managed estates, which had been ruined by inflation during the Wars of Religion (1562-98). Richelieu embarked on a military career, but in order to retain the bishopric of Lucon, near La Rochelle, he switched to theology.

  2. Economic and social issues were the main cause of Tudor Rebellion in Tudor England. ...

    This also meant that the parliament seats will be assigned to Spaniards. In contrast to Simnel and Warbeck, Wyatt had no intention of overthrowing Mary to the throne but wanted to prevent the changes that Mary may establish. Another difference is that Wyatt was able to attract support nationally and was not seen as threatening as Simnel and Warbeck.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work