• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Important was German Opposition to the Nazis?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

?Opposition to the Nazi regime made very little impact on the German people as a whole between 1933?1939? Explain why you agree or disagree with this view There were several different opposition groups within the period up to the war within Nazi Germany, in this question I am going to assess whether or not the different opposition groups made any impact within the German population at time. However, this question is difficult to answer; there were no opinion polls meaning the people?s attitudes were never truly represented, so we cannot get an accurate picture of the population?s actual feelings. Also reports from Sopade or Gestapo cannot be seen as completely valid as they would be biased and would not provide a true insight. For opposition to have a real impact on the people, it needs to be active ? meaning that you openly go out of your way to oppose Hitler and not just non-conformity. Not all non-conformist behaviour can be interpreted as opposition. The term ?loyal reluctance? means that you support the regime as a whole, but there is one certain issue that you didn?t agree with. This was the case within many groups within Germany. ...read more.

Middle

The response of many young people was to drop out these activies. There was a growing rate of absenteeism within the youth in the late 1930?s. Those who did attend sometimes demonstrated their independence by humming songs that had been banned by the regime and by misbehaving. This behaviour can be seen as just ?teenage rebelliousness?. This nonconformist behaviour amounted to little more than normal teenage behaviour but under the Nazis any assertion of independence was considered to be a threat. The youth were not openly opposing Hitler and the regime; they were just behaving like teenagers do. Again, they were loyally reluctant; this did not mean that they weren?t going to grow up into good, strong proud Nazis. So it can be argued that the youth resistance was not really opposition, just non-conformist behaviour and thus made little impact on the German people at all. The protestant supported Nazi ideas as they were nationalist themselves, they were both anti-semeitic and anti-communist, two of the Nazi polices. However, not all Protestants were willing to support developments in the church. The establishment of the pastor?s emergency league in 1933 and its development into the Confessional church in 1934 by themselves were acts of resistance ? they were led by pastors who weren?t members of the Nazi party, thus going against the regime. ...read more.

Conclusion

The churches did not provide a massive challenge to the regime; Protestants supported the Nazis anyway because of there nationalist ideas. So they did not cause much of a problem. The Catholic Church just wanted to be allowed to carry on practicing religion without interference from the Nazis, and thus they would stay out of affairs to do with politics. They were not serious opposition against Hitler and the Nazis. However, it is worth noting that there was a growing number of absenteeism from the workers and the youth. Although this was severely clamped down on. The biggest challenge was proposed by the JW?s, they openly opposed Hitler and did not conform with any of the rules as they swore their oath to Jehovah and Hitler, however they were a small group and were easily picked off with no problem and thus caused very limited impact on the German people as a whole. The same can be said to all the other opposition groups and loyal reluctance was a common theme throughout a lot of the opposition groups excluding the Jehovah?s witnesses. Overall, opposition provided little impact to the regime and had little impact on the German people, as the Nazi regime could easily crush these groups before any real opposition was mounted. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Hitler and the Nazi Regime - revision sheet.

    - the party itself wasn't unified. It consisted of a mass of organizations like that were keen to uphold their own interests. - Hitler created new agencies to speed up particular projects. Some historians believed that the anarchic system controlled system, rather than he the system.

  2. Describe the Nazi's stance on Homosexuality

    Such procedures reflected the desire by Himmler and others to find a medical solution to homosexuality. The vast majority of homosexual victims were males; lesbians were not subjected to systematic persecution. While lesbian bars were closed, few women are believed to have been arrested.

  1. In the years 1933 " 1945 the German Churches supported and collaborated with the ...

    to one of conflict between the years of 1933 and 1939 because at first the Nazis feared openly standing against religious policies as they felt they were not popular enough to stand against such an institution as the Catholic Church and did not yet have the power.

  2. How successfully did the Nazis impose their ideology on German women?

    An unmarried mother mayhave a hard path. But she knows that when we are at war, it is better to have a child under the most difficult conditions than not to have one at all ... the family is the basis of the country, but during a war the highest

  1. To What Extent was Self-Preservation the Prime Motive of the Catholic Church's subservience to ...

    "...The fear of another state-sponsored attack on Catholicism (much like the one waged under Bismarck in the 1870's) was a serious factor in the minds of many German clergymen"5 The state-sponsored attack that Greich-Polelle refers to is the Kulturkampf. Roughly translated, the 'Culture Wars' were a direct attack by Bismarck on the Catholic Church in Prussia, during the 1870's.

  2. WHAT WAS THE EXTENT OF THE OPPOSITION TO HITLER'S REGIME?

    A third, and the most significant, stance was taken in opposition to the regime's euthanasia programme from 1939 onwards. These complaints varied in the degree of their success. The Protestant opposition was less likely to succeed than the Catholic, owing to the fragmentation of Protestantism into a number of different

  1. Describe the main forms of opposition to the Nazi regime, 1933 - 1939/Why did ...

    The communists in theory should have been Hitler's fiercest opponents, but in reality they were ineffective. This was partly due to them being the most persecuted victims of the regime and also because their popularity meant most Germans were terrified by the prospect of a communist revolution and therefore welcomed the Nazi repression of the KPD.

  2. Nietzsche and the Nazis.

    However, unlike the other cultural icons Nazis utilized, the relationship between Nietzsche and the Nazis developed in an odd, but widely effective manner. Nietzsche's influence as a philosopher and a writer was apparently limited to his closest friends and some intellectuals in Austria, France and Denmark (Canada, 1997).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work