• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How important was Lenin to the success of the October 1917 Revolution?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How important was Lenin to the success of the October 1917 Revolution? (Consider Lenin's oratory, his leadership, his personality, his actions and other factors not down to Lenin) Just before the October 1917 revolution, Russia's people, its power and its future appeared rather unstable. Tsar Nicholas was no longer the Russian leader, and a general election was the only obvious next step in order for Russia to find them a new leader. Because the Tsar no longer had power over Russia, this allowed many people, originally exiled by the tsar, to return "home" to the country. Among the persons returning was Vladimir Lenin, who returned on April 3rd 1917. Lenin held a speech later that month, in which he set out his analysis of where Russian politics should develop. ...read more.

Middle

The German's had heard of Lenin's April Theses and liked his aims. This was because Germany had seen that Lenin wanted to pull out of the war, which was a good thing for the Germans as it meant that their opposition (Britain, France, etc.) would lose a powerful ally. Germany offered to fund the Bolsheviks to mount their publicity campaigns. Also, the speech had won the support of or increased the support of many peasants and workers throughout the nation. It created many people who had become dedicated to the revolution ideas. These people formed an army under the control of Leon Trotsky. They were known as the "Red Guard" (Red being the colour of the Bolshevik flag) and gave the Bolsheviks the military power to win a war. ...read more.

Conclusion

Lenin was a brilliant leader for the Bolsheviks. He was a professional revolutionary with an iron will, he was ruthless, a brilliant speaker, and a good planner with one particular aim which would provide the country with so much more - to overthrow the government. He was the forefront for the Bolsheviks and promoted them greatly. The Bolsheviks, extremely well led, and who now had a strong fit army, had several aims to help the country's people, had plans to set about a greater future for Russia and financial support of a strong foreign country, all thanks to their leader's great public speeches, and campaign. If it had not been for Lenin, the Bolsheviks would be slacking in some of the above categories, or not achieving what was desired. This almost certainly shows that Lenin was in fact extremely important to the 1917 revolution, because of the power that he brought and gave the Bolsheviks. Henry Hayhurst-France 10B ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    What effect did the Continental System have on France? * Continental System - After 1793 British goods were prohibited from French territories. Napoleon expanded this as a way of weakening Britain and protecting the Napoleonic Empire, which now became a huge market for French goods. After that, the economic campaign against Britain intensified.

  2. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    when this was interpreted as meaning that Kerensky was secretly plotting with the Germans to hand over the city so that its revolutionary fires could be quenched. This interpretation was complete nonsense, but Kerensky found it difficult to avoid being associated with comments such as this one, by Mikhail Rodzianko,

  1. How important was Lenin to the success of the October 1917 Revolution?

    Trotsky planned and organised how the Bolsheviks seized power. It was his idea to use the Congress as a cover to seize power and to claim that it was all done for the Soviet. One could therefore argue that Trotsky was much more instrumental than Lenin in the success of the revolution, because he adopted a much more involved role in the physical takeover of the Winter Palace.

  2. Account For the Success of the Bolsheviks in October 1917

    more to blame than the successes of the Bolsheviks for the Socialist Revolution. The Provisional Government was delicate by its very nature, it was not democratically elected, it was illegitimate, and had no mandate to rule. Why should opposition groups recognise such a government?

  1. Select and Explain the Most Important Reasons For the October Revolution in 1917.

    They did try to introduce rationing to improve chances of making their supplies last however they were unable to transport the supplies they had around Russia quickly enough so they're idea failed. The Provisional government was faced with insurmountable problems, and had little chance of surviving all along although perhaps

  2. The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

    In February 1917 (old style calendar) the Russian Tsarist Empire came to an end as a result of civil unrest in Petrograd during what is known as the February Revolution. A Provisional Government was formed from the Tsarist Duma to act as a 'caretaker' government until a proper democracy could be established after the war.

  1. The 1917 Revolution.

    Meanwhile, a conflict, aggravated by Russian military defeats and very heavy casualties in the war, had developed between the Tsarist government on the one hand and the Duma and the War Industry Committee on the other. In the name of efficiency and of national solidarity in the prosecution of the

  2. Why did the Tsar lose power in 1917?

    Their military programme wouldn?t be ready until 1917. They also weren?t ready economically; Figes said ?war will necessitate expenditures which are beyond Russia?s financial means? stating that Russia couldn?t afford this war. Figes also said ?a European war is mortally dangerous for whomever wins? which is suggesting that even if

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work