• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How important was Lenin to the success of the October 1917 Revolution?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How important was Lenin to the success of the October 1917 Revolution? (Consider Lenin's oratory, his leadership, his personality, his actions and other factors not down to Lenin) Just before the October 1917 revolution, Russia's people, its power and its future appeared rather unstable. Tsar Nicholas was no longer the Russian leader, and a general election was the only obvious next step in order for Russia to find them a new leader. Because the Tsar no longer had power over Russia, this allowed many people, originally exiled by the tsar, to return "home" to the country. Among the persons returning was Vladimir Lenin, who returned on April 3rd 1917. Lenin held a speech later that month, in which he set out his analysis of where Russian politics should develop. ...read more.

Middle

The German's had heard of Lenin's April Theses and liked his aims. This was because Germany had seen that Lenin wanted to pull out of the war, which was a good thing for the Germans as it meant that their opposition (Britain, France, etc.) would lose a powerful ally. Germany offered to fund the Bolsheviks to mount their publicity campaigns. Also, the speech had won the support of or increased the support of many peasants and workers throughout the nation. It created many people who had become dedicated to the revolution ideas. These people formed an army under the control of Leon Trotsky. They were known as the "Red Guard" (Red being the colour of the Bolshevik flag) and gave the Bolsheviks the military power to win a war. ...read more.

Conclusion

Lenin was a brilliant leader for the Bolsheviks. He was a professional revolutionary with an iron will, he was ruthless, a brilliant speaker, and a good planner with one particular aim which would provide the country with so much more - to overthrow the government. He was the forefront for the Bolsheviks and promoted them greatly. The Bolsheviks, extremely well led, and who now had a strong fit army, had several aims to help the country's people, had plans to set about a greater future for Russia and financial support of a strong foreign country, all thanks to their leader's great public speeches, and campaign. If it had not been for Lenin, the Bolsheviks would be slacking in some of the above categories, or not achieving what was desired. This almost certainly shows that Lenin was in fact extremely important to the 1917 revolution, because of the power that he brought and gave the Bolsheviks. Henry Hayhurst-France 10B ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    * He announced his willingness to pay subsidies on an unprecedented scale to any ally willing to provide the troops needed to fight Napoleon on the continent, but neither Russia, Austria nor Prussia came forward. * Austria and Russia were both anxious to see Napoleon defeated, but were not prepared

  2. How important was Lenin to the success of the October 1917 Revolution?

    This may have seemed rather strange at the time, as the Soviets did not necessarily support the Bolsheviks. However, it allowed Lenin the opportunity to get the Soviets 'on his side' because they wanted the power he said he would provide for them.

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    was considered to be better protected from the danger of German occupation. The idea originated with the Kerensky Government, which was, entirely properly, considering all military possibilities and weighing all options. However, there were some in the government, (including Kerensky himself)

  2. The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

    They had been cut off from iron ore in the Urals, coal in the Don and oil at Baku. Industry was greatly suffering and the troops had limited supplies. The government printed more money to pay for its debts although this only led to inflation and magnified the problem of food production.

  1. How important was Lenin to the success of the October 1917 Revolution?

    Trotsky planned and organised how the Bolsheviks seized power. It was his idea to use the Congress as a cover to seize power and to claim that it was all done for the Soviet. One could therefore argue that Trotsky was much more instrumental than Lenin in the success of the revolution, because he adopted a much more involved role in the physical takeover of the Winter Palace.

  2. Account For the Success of the Bolsheviks in October 1917

    Although, we must remember, that Lenin had incorrectly pushed for an unsuccessful revolution in July. Lenin is famed to have said, 'History will not forgive us if we do not assume power,' Lenin chose, successfully, when to seize power. The Weaknesses of the Provisional Government were as much, if not

  1. Select and Explain the Most Important Reasons For the October Revolution in 1917.

    They did try to introduce rationing to improve chances of making their supplies last however they were unable to transport the supplies they had around Russia quickly enough so they're idea failed. The Provisional government was faced with insurmountable problems, and had little chance of surviving all along although perhaps

  2. Why did the Tsar lose power in 1917?

    Their military programme wouldn?t be ready until 1917. They also weren?t ready economically; Figes said ?war will necessitate expenditures which are beyond Russia?s financial means? stating that Russia couldn?t afford this war. Figes also said ?a European war is mortally dangerous for whomever wins? which is suggesting that even if

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work