• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How important was politics & the power struggle in disputes between Charles & his opponents in the years 1640 " 1642

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How important was politics & the power struggle in disputes between Charles & his opponents in the years 1640 - 1642 To fully understand the politics and the power struggle between Charles and his political opponents you have to look at a number of matters for example: The look on Divine right. This was a major issue in disputes as the king (Charles) didn't think parliament saw him as thee divine right king and took it to their own liberty to try and bypass the king's authorisation. With a matter of issues (Stafford's impeachment) the king was failing to realise the change in times and the beginning of a republic revolution and that the people wanted their say against matters and that the king was losing his power and influence over the people (as it will be shown in the civil war). But thanks to his advisors advice and the influence his wife also had kept the king on the tracks of 'he ...read more.

Middle

As told by many historians Charles had very inconsistent behaviour this proves to show that he wanted to patch together his disputes with parliament but at the same time trying to gain control of the arsenal's around the country so from this you can read between the lines that Charles was accepting advice and as stated all ready acting as a puppet for his advisors Pym was the main opposer to Charles and his advisors he had been the driving force behind parliamentary opposition to the king since the short parliament of 1640 he had been the main man to set up the winning clockworks to win the war and also was a true leader in parliament who held dividing sides of parliament together this was a pain to the king as he wanted a divide in parliament to use it as a way to cause unrest and a reason to close another session of parliament. ...read more.

Conclusion

war due to his provoking of matters this shows such importance In the power struggle and also in politics as this was the cause of such feuded between the king and parliament So from within this essay I have shown to as much as I can possible shown the importance between politics and a power struggle in the disputes between King Charles the 1st and his parliamentarian foes using methods of key issues and facts I know of to create this essay to put the matter of king Charles personal and parliament issues and in such a dispute causing the civil war to occur. Daniel whites essay on the importance of politics and the power struggle in disputes between Charles the 1st and his opponents (parliament) in the years of 1640-1642 in the current state of the English civil war showing how important politics was towards the start and finish of the English civil wars through the reign of Charles Words: 814 Lines: 82 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. The roles and leadership of Charles Stuart and John Pym in the English Civil ...

    For example, the Earl of Worcester donated three hundred thousand pounds before the war was over. No other sources I found backed up that the king had more followers, but according to one of the chapters written in The English Civil War and After by Brian Manning6, the King had

  2. In 1640 most MP's wanted and expected redress of grievances and a settlement of ...

    Some wanted the Presbyterian model while others felt no need to remove bishops, instead just reducing their power. When Parliament had the common enemy of the Laudia reforms to fight they were united, but remove the common enemy and they began to fight amongst themselves.

  1. Charlemagne Essay.

    This was because he had to deal with Pepin's the hunchback's revolt. Other historians argue that the reason why Charles reacted late was because he did not have enough sources according to AKF. This would have reduced Charles's size of cavalry.

  2. This essay examines the actions of Charles VII in relation to events pertaining to ...

    For a few months after the Paris debacle, it appeared as if Charles had been correct in listening to the advice of his counsellors as there appeared to be some success in his negotiations with the Duke. Ultimately, Joan's suspicions proved to be correct as the Duke did not concede Paris upon the end of the truce.

  1. Disraeli an unprincipled adventurer in politics

    This belief was expressed in Disraeli's reaction to the 1834 Poor Law Amendment Act. This Bill founded a Poor Law Commission to supervise the national operation of the Poor Law system, included the moulding together of small parishes into Poor Law Unions and the building of workhouses in each union for the giving of poor relief.

  2. Consider The Argument That “The Most Provocative Issue In Arousing Opposition to Charles 1 ...

    Laud also caused a lot of uproar over the case of Prynne, Bastwick and Burton in 1638. These men were anti- Arminians and they wrote their criticism of the Bishops and Clergy in pamphlets of the time. They were therefore accused of being 'invaders of the King's prerogative, contemners of

  1. Nell Gwyn (Playhouse Cretaures) essay

    drama The Indian Emperor, playing Cydaria, daughter of Montezuma and love interest to Cortez, played by her real-life lover Charles Hart. Pepys, whose diary usually has great things to say about Gwyn, was displeased with her performance in this same part two years later: "...to the King's playhouse, and there

  2. Why was there so much hostility towards Charles by 1640?

    The greatest, and most important right, was there Freedom of Speech. This meant that the Crown accepted that Members of Parliament had the right to discuss matters which affected the Commonwealth. These included things such as taxation, the Poor Law, the state of highways and Crime.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work