• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How important was politics & the power struggle in disputes between Charles & his opponents in the years 1640 " 1642

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How important was politics & the power struggle in disputes between Charles & his opponents in the years 1640 - 1642 To fully understand the politics and the power struggle between Charles and his political opponents you have to look at a number of matters for example: The look on Divine right. This was a major issue in disputes as the king (Charles) didn't think parliament saw him as thee divine right king and took it to their own liberty to try and bypass the king's authorisation. With a matter of issues (Stafford's impeachment) the king was failing to realise the change in times and the beginning of a republic revolution and that the people wanted their say against matters and that the king was losing his power and influence over the people (as it will be shown in the civil war). But thanks to his advisors advice and the influence his wife also had kept the king on the tracks of 'he ...read more.

Middle

As told by many historians Charles had very inconsistent behaviour this proves to show that he wanted to patch together his disputes with parliament but at the same time trying to gain control of the arsenal's around the country so from this you can read between the lines that Charles was accepting advice and as stated all ready acting as a puppet for his advisors Pym was the main opposer to Charles and his advisors he had been the driving force behind parliamentary opposition to the king since the short parliament of 1640 he had been the main man to set up the winning clockworks to win the war and also was a true leader in parliament who held dividing sides of parliament together this was a pain to the king as he wanted a divide in parliament to use it as a way to cause unrest and a reason to close another session of parliament. ...read more.

Conclusion

war due to his provoking of matters this shows such importance In the power struggle and also in politics as this was the cause of such feuded between the king and parliament So from within this essay I have shown to as much as I can possible shown the importance between politics and a power struggle in the disputes between King Charles the 1st and his parliamentarian foes using methods of key issues and facts I know of to create this essay to put the matter of king Charles personal and parliament issues and in such a dispute causing the civil war to occur. Daniel whites essay on the importance of politics and the power struggle in disputes between Charles the 1st and his opponents (parliament) in the years of 1640-1642 in the current state of the English civil war showing how important politics was towards the start and finish of the English civil wars through the reign of Charles Words: 814 Lines: 82 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Was Charles I responsible for his execution?

    On the other hand, maybe Charles has a feeling that the people will not stand for his death, so even if Parliament executed him a new king will succeed to the throne. Of course, with hindsight we see that this actually happened.

  2. The roles and leadership of Charles Stuart and John Pym in the English Civil ...

    For example, the Earl of Worcester donated three hundred thousand pounds before the war was over. No other sources I found backed up that the king had more followers, but according to one of the chapters written in The English Civil War and After by Brian Manning6, the King had

  1. Disraeli an unprincipled adventurer in politics

    This belief was expressed in Disraeli's reaction to the 1834 Poor Law Amendment Act. This Bill founded a Poor Law Commission to supervise the national operation of the Poor Law system, included the moulding together of small parishes into Poor Law Unions and the building of workhouses in each union for the giving of poor relief.

  2. This essay examines the actions of Charles VII in relation to events pertaining to ...

    During the time she and other military leaders spent near Paris, they personally surveyed the Parisian fortifications. Her army was strong enough and had already identified weaknesses in the enemy stronghold, yet several frustrations halted their ability to execute their assault.

  1. Nell Gwyn (Playhouse Cretaures) essay

    suit her, to judge from the lines she was later made to say in the epilogue to a Robert Howard drama: We have been all ill-us'd, by this day's poet. 'Tis our joint cause; I know you in your hearts Hate serious plays, as I do serious parts.[13] It was

  2. How important was religion in the disputes between Charles I and his opponents in ...

    Some were deeply committed to reform of the Church along Puritan lines, there were some who disliked this idea and preferred the genuine affection for the tradition Anglican Church. While able to maintain parliamentary unity and the prerogative courts were finally abolished however they had failed to find an agreed way in reforming the Church.

  1. Charlemagne Essay.

    Ordinary freemen gave infantry services, including to that, he had available mounted services from vassals. Feudal institutions provided mounted services. Feudal institution used was benefice and vassalage. Charles alienated his demesne to his vassals. He granted out benefices from conquered land.

  2. Why was there so much hostility towards Charles by 1640?

    Another right of Parliament was that the King had no right to enter the House of Commons chamber. This way the king had no way of interfering with Parliament when it was in session. Arminianism and the fear of Catholics By Charles? reign, England was now a Protestant Country.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work