• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How important was politics & the power struggle in disputes between Charles & his opponents in the years 1640 " 1642

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How important was politics & the power struggle in disputes between Charles & his opponents in the years 1640 - 1642 To fully understand the politics and the power struggle between Charles and his political opponents you have to look at a number of matters for example: The look on Divine right. This was a major issue in disputes as the king (Charles) didn't think parliament saw him as thee divine right king and took it to their own liberty to try and bypass the king's authorisation. With a matter of issues (Stafford's impeachment) the king was failing to realise the change in times and the beginning of a republic revolution and that the people wanted their say against matters and that the king was losing his power and influence over the people (as it will be shown in the civil war). But thanks to his advisors advice and the influence his wife also had kept the king on the tracks of 'he ...read more.

Middle

As told by many historians Charles had very inconsistent behaviour this proves to show that he wanted to patch together his disputes with parliament but at the same time trying to gain control of the arsenal's around the country so from this you can read between the lines that Charles was accepting advice and as stated all ready acting as a puppet for his advisors Pym was the main opposer to Charles and his advisors he had been the driving force behind parliamentary opposition to the king since the short parliament of 1640 he had been the main man to set up the winning clockworks to win the war and also was a true leader in parliament who held dividing sides of parliament together this was a pain to the king as he wanted a divide in parliament to use it as a way to cause unrest and a reason to close another session of parliament. ...read more.

Conclusion

war due to his provoking of matters this shows such importance In the power struggle and also in politics as this was the cause of such feuded between the king and parliament So from within this essay I have shown to as much as I can possible shown the importance between politics and a power struggle in the disputes between King Charles the 1st and his parliamentarian foes using methods of key issues and facts I know of to create this essay to put the matter of king Charles personal and parliament issues and in such a dispute causing the civil war to occur. Daniel whites essay on the importance of politics and the power struggle in disputes between Charles the 1st and his opponents (parliament) in the years of 1640-1642 in the current state of the English civil war showing how important politics was towards the start and finish of the English civil wars through the reign of Charles Words: 814 Lines: 82 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Consider The Argument That “The Most Provocative Issue In Arousing Opposition to Charles 1 ...

    The treatment of these three men showed Laud's favouritism towards Arminians and possibly towards Catholics. This upset a lot of people and led to opposition against him and the King.

  2. The roles and leadership of Charles Stuart and John Pym in the English Civil ...

    the majority of the house of Lords on his side while the majority of house of Commons supported Parliament. Which leads me to believe that both sources hold truth in them and that simply, the Lords were far more able to provide arms and cavalry for the King as they

  1. Charlemagne Essay.

    The freemen levies probably came to domintate the army more in the latter stages of the reign when Charles was thrown more on the defensive. Ganshof argues that Charles had to adopt a more defensive stance in the last decade of his reign and that the freemen would have been used against invasions of Danes, Saracens, and Slavs.

  2. In 1640 most MP's wanted and expected redress of grievances and a settlement of ...

    Here was a crisis because Pym knew that he could not be punished and his power was great only when he had full support of the Parliament, but now it was dividing with the view that the MP's had no option now but to either appease the king or further weaken him.

  1. Disraeli an unprincipled adventurer in politics

    In conclusion one can say that Disraeli's conversion to the Conservative party was mainly a genuine switch even though it may have been influenced by the generosity of Lord Lyndhurst The character of Disraeli can also been seen to be principled in is by his belief that rich members of society have a duty to the poor.

  2. Nell Gwyn (Playhouse Cretaures) essay

    She was taught her craft by one of the fine male actors of the time, Charles Hart, and learned dancing from another, John Lacy; both were rumored by satirists of the time to be her lovers, but if she had such a relationship with Lacy (Beauclerk thinks it unlikely), it

  1. How important was religion in the disputes between Charles I and his opponents in ...

    Some were deeply committed to reform of the Church along Puritan lines, there were some who disliked this idea and preferred the genuine affection for the tradition Anglican Church. While able to maintain parliamentary unity and the prerogative courts were finally abolished however they had failed to find an agreed way in reforming the Church.

  2. Why was there so much hostility towards Charles by 1640?

    Another right of Parliament was that the King had no right to enter the House of Commons chamber. This way the king had no way of interfering with Parliament when it was in session. Arminianism and the fear of Catholics By Charles? reign, England was now a Protestant Country.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work