• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How important was politics & the power struggle in disputes between Charles & his opponents in the years 1640 " 1642

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How important was politics & the power struggle in disputes between Charles & his opponents in the years 1640 - 1642 To fully understand the politics and the power struggle between Charles and his political opponents you have to look at a number of matters for example: The look on Divine right. This was a major issue in disputes as the king (Charles) didn't think parliament saw him as thee divine right king and took it to their own liberty to try and bypass the king's authorisation. With a matter of issues (Stafford's impeachment) the king was failing to realise the change in times and the beginning of a republic revolution and that the people wanted their say against matters and that the king was losing his power and influence over the people (as it will be shown in the civil war). But thanks to his advisors advice and the influence his wife also had kept the king on the tracks of 'he ...read more.

Middle

As told by many historians Charles had very inconsistent behaviour this proves to show that he wanted to patch together his disputes with parliament but at the same time trying to gain control of the arsenal's around the country so from this you can read between the lines that Charles was accepting advice and as stated all ready acting as a puppet for his advisors Pym was the main opposer to Charles and his advisors he had been the driving force behind parliamentary opposition to the king since the short parliament of 1640 he had been the main man to set up the winning clockworks to win the war and also was a true leader in parliament who held dividing sides of parliament together this was a pain to the king as he wanted a divide in parliament to use it as a way to cause unrest and a reason to close another session of parliament. ...read more.

Conclusion

war due to his provoking of matters this shows such importance In the power struggle and also in politics as this was the cause of such feuded between the king and parliament So from within this essay I have shown to as much as I can possible shown the importance between politics and a power struggle in the disputes between King Charles the 1st and his parliamentarian foes using methods of key issues and facts I know of to create this essay to put the matter of king Charles personal and parliament issues and in such a dispute causing the civil war to occur. Daniel whites essay on the importance of politics and the power struggle in disputes between Charles the 1st and his opponents (parliament) in the years of 1640-1642 in the current state of the English civil war showing how important politics was towards the start and finish of the English civil wars through the reign of Charles Words: 814 Lines: 82 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. The roles and leadership of Charles Stuart and John Pym in the English Civil ...

    For example, the Earl of Worcester donated three hundred thousand pounds before the war was over. No other sources I found backed up that the king had more followers, but according to one of the chapters written in The English Civil War and After by Brian Manning6, the King had

  2. In 1640 most MP's wanted and expected redress of grievances and a settlement of ...

    Catholic native Irish, the Old English and the New English and Scots. The Catholic Native Irish and the Old English, both Catholic, were worried by the events in England and their obvious hatred of Catholicism, and were scared that Parliament would form an alliance with the Protestant New English and

  1. Charlemagne Essay.

    According to these historians ti is more likely that Charlemagne's military success was due to his skill in organising and supplying substantial armies which overwhelmed his enemies. Some of his enemies were no doubt cavalry, but the main freemen levies were probably not.

  2. This essay examines the actions of Charles VII in relation to events pertaining to ...

    under scrutiny during the Trial of Rehabilitation.44 The motive for the reassessment was the struggle of power between the church and the state. Charles was preoccupied in establishing the rights and authorities held by monarchs and nobles in the ecclesiastical atmosphere of France, thus weakening the reach of the papacy

  1. Disraeli an unprincipled adventurer in politics

    The act was "Whig-Benthamite reforming legislation of the period"6 passed by Earl Grey in order to dissuade people from becoming poor and wanting to join the Work house system. In 1840 Disraeli condemned the New Poor Law and the Work house system due to his belief that the government should help the poor in a paternal way.

  2. Nell Gwyn (Playhouse Cretaures) essay

    saw 'The Indian Emperour;' where I find Nell come again, which I am glad of; but was most infinitely displeased with her being put to act the Emperour's daughter; which is a great and serious part, which she do most basely."[12] Gwyn herself seems to agree that drama did not

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work