• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How important was religion in the disputes between Charles I and his opponents in the period from 1640-1642?

Extracts from this document...


How important was religion in the disputes between Charles I and his opponents in the period from 1640-1642? There were many different factors such as religion, the Grand Remonstrance, Irish Rebellion and other factors, which created much opposition against Charles I. In this essay I will discuss further the factors and how important they were in the disputes between Charles I and his opponents. Religion was one of many factors that caused disputes between Charles and his opponents. The changes introduced by Charles and Archbishop Laud in the church had created widespread and apparently united opposition. A petition was made which called for the reversal of Laud's reforms and the abolition of bishops governing the church but nothing was resolved. Later there was widespread unpopularity of the Laudian bishops. Most wanted the reforms made by Laud to be abolished and they wanted to restore a Protestant church but few were committed to any Presbyterian model and even fewer to the abolition of bishops. In January 1641 Charles removed the bishops from the Privy Council, which meant they had a less powerful role in administration and government. ...read more.


Some however were unwilling to entrust such an army to the King whom they feared might be helping the revels and might even use against the army. This made some MP's very angry as it was a insult to the king as it was an infringement of the King's powers. We can see here that the King already had opposition as many people didn't trust him but he still had some supporters. Any attempt to make further inroads into the royal prerogative would undoubtedly create divisions in the Parliament that the opposition feared. On 22 November 1641 Pym introduced a Grand Remonstrance to the King, which was another factor that was important in the disputes between the King and his opponents. This reviewed the events of the previous year and reminded the House what had been achieved before setting out challenges that remained. Later a Militia Bill providing an army for Ireland was introduced, with an amendment proposing that Parliament should be given the right to approve the King's choice of commander. ...read more.


The opposition planned to formulate new demands and place further restrictions on the King. They put forward a list of ten points but the King did not agree to them. MP's came with a conviction that the King had overstepped his powers and infringed both law and rights of Parliament. They united in demanding the removal of such abuses and securing parliaments for the future. This was quite an important factor as we can see that his Parliament was not happy with him and this created disputes between Charles and his opposition. To conclude I do think that religion was an important factor in the disputes between Charles I and his opposition but I think that the other factors were important as well. I think that religion played the biggest part in the disputes between the King and his opposition as it was linked to all the factors for instance the Irish Rebellion was to do with the Catholics and Protestants but I do think that the other factors do have some importance in the disputes between Charles and his opposition as well. ?? ?? ?? ?? Ashanthi de Silva 12/3 Charles I ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. The roles and leadership of Charles Stuart and John Pym in the English Civil ...

    From this I can not really detect if she believes it was as important a factor as Russel believed it to be. She points out that the financial system did take quite a while to get up and running, and "were at last beginning to bear fruit" after his death in December 1643.

  2. To what extent should changes in the relationship between monarchy and parliament from 1529 ...

    During the 1530s the economy changed. There was increasing discontent over issues such as the introduction of enclosures and inflation in prices. This led to a disruption in traditional village life. This was the only real discontent with finance during the reign of henry as he passed the Statute of wills to ensure co-operation.

  1. This essay examines the actions of Charles VII in relation to events pertaining to ...

    This source is also useful in its different interpretations of the changing image of Joan since her death. 42 Pinzino, Jane Marie. The Condemnation and Rehabilitation Trials of Joan of Arc. <http://www.smu.edu/ijas/pinzino.html>. A commentary of the two trials with additional information regarding the political significance of each trial.

  2. How important was politics &amp;amp; the power struggle in disputes between Charles &amp;amp; his ...

    Another was how his advisors mainly used the king as their own puppet what had a massive amount of power 'Charles was the perfect puppet for a bad advisor' examples of this was how laud used the power given to him by the king to put in massive unpopular moves in religion (book of sports ect..)

  1. How far was Parliament more responsible than Charles for the breakdown of their relationship ...

    The first cause of a division was with the presentation of the 'Root and Branch Petition' in December 1640 to Parliament. It called for the abolition of bishops, an issue over which MPs took two distinct viewpoints - either strongly supporting or strongly opposing it.

  2. How far were the actions and beliefs of Charles responsible for the crisis of ...

    He was not confident in his own abilities so heavily relied on the advice of others, allowing him to be easily influenced and manipulated. He liked order and formality, rules and morality. He was a devout protestant in his beliefs yet admired the elaborateness of Catholicism, which did not bode well with his people.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work