• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How important was the Bolshevik threat to Tsardom in the reign of Nicholas II

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐How important was the Bolshevik threat to Tsardom in the reign of Nicholas II? In order to form an opinion of how important the Bolshevik threat was, we need to clearly understand the many factors that affected the strength of Tsar Nicholas II and his autocratic reign. To avoid being subjective, we must scrutinize primary and secondary sources, evaluate each source based on its reliability and credibility and then apply the correct information to articulate an accurate conclusion. To begin to execute an objective overview that incorporates events, ideas and people that may have influenced Tsarist Russia at the turn of the 20th Century, we need to analyze certain points in history prior and after Nicholas II arrival at Russia?s seat of power. The embarrassing defeat in the Crimean War in 1856 highlighted serious issues in Russia?s industrial, financial and communications structures and therefore became the catalyst for Alexander II (Nicholas II Grandfather) to implement social reforms. The Emancipation of the Serfs in 1861 encouraged a double negative effect on the long term continuation of Tsardom, releasing peasants from slavery and creating a stronger upper lower class in the form of ?Kulaks?. These social reforms also alienated much of the nobility or bourgeoisie that had profited from serfdom, creating resentment at both ends of the social spectrum. ...read more.

Middle

Dating from the 1870?s, Populism was a revolutionary movement that drew its members from the middle and upper classes and as a result they regarded it their duty to educate the peasantry. However, the Populist Movement (Narodniki) lacked any tangible success due to peasant hostility, ?the peasants? ignorance, superstition, prejudice and deep-rooted loyalty to the Tsar ensured that by 1874, 1600 populists had been arrested? (Waller, S. 2009). The Social Revolutionaries were a descendant of the Populist Movement and as so their views were similar. They adapted far more than their predecessors and had some minor success, particularly with terrorist acts by blowing up various Ministers between 1901 and 1905. This adept means of propaganda, ?made the Social Revolutionaries seem like a party of action? (Murphy, D. & Morris, T. 2008), but this was little more than superficial bravado. Inspired by the teachings of Karl Marx, the Social Democrats wanted to create a more socially balanced society based on Marx?s Communist Theory. The Social Democratic leader George Plekhanov formed the party in 1898, but many members became disillusioned with his theoretical leadership style and wanted a more proactive approach. The foremost advocate of this approach was Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov, also known as Lenin, ?Lenin envisaged a disciplined and dedicated group of professional revolutionaries which would act as the ?vanguard of the proletariat? (Murphy, D. ...read more.

Conclusion

Pyotr Stolypin became synonymous with the ?Stolypin necktie? as his fields court martial, resulted in many hangings. With the advent of the First World War, the Tsar?s already uncertain future became doomed, due to the length of the war, the millions of casualties that Russia suffered and soaring inflation. The February Revolution of 1917 became the climax of the crisis. Tsardom collapsed from within, none of the generals or politicians fought to save the regime and there was no direct effect from outside revolutionary pressure. To summarise, when Lenin returned to Russia in April 1917, Nicholas had already abdicated, after his position had become untenable and on the advice of high command generals. Lenin persuaded the masses with his ?April Theses? that built up Bolshevik membership and subsequently persuaded the Bolshevik Central Committee to take action in October 1917. The Bolsheviks were dealt a stroke of luck when Alexander Kerensky was appointed Prime Minister, as he was inept and unqualified for such a role at a pivotal time. The threat of the Bolsheviks during the reign of Tsar Nicholas II was extremely minimal. Although they were the most well prepared to seize power, the Bolsheviks were no doubt helped by a string of important events culminating in the First World War. Tsardom self imploded, greatly assisted than any other key point, by the weak and inept Tsar Nicholas II. Words count 1347. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. The Bolshevik Consolidation of power 1917-21.

    * Trotsky's basic plan was to defend the reds internal lines of communication and prevent the whites from maintaining regular supplies and concentrating their forces in one area. * Trotsky also maintained control of the railways which gave the reds an advantage because they were able to transport large numbers of troops quickly to key areas of attack or defence.

  2. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    Theproletariat provided a more concrete base of support than did the army, which was on the verge of dissolution. Moreover, the support of the workers gave the Bolsheviks a geographical base of support which stretched beyond the garrison towns. The Red Guards, who would provide critical support for the insurrection, were drawn from among the ranks of the urban proletariat.

  1. How Serious Was The Threat Posed To Henry VII By Pretenders To The Throne

    whose threat lasted from 1499-1506. His threat lasted from 1499 to 1506 ans was in my opinion the most dangerous threat to Henry. Following the death of his older brother at the Battle of Stoke, Suffolk became the leading Yorkist claimant to the throne. Henry spared his life and allowed him to succeed to his father's title of Duke of Suffolk in 1491.

  2. The Bolshevik Consolidation of Power 1918-21.

    There is a strong likelihood that Lenin's readiness to make peace with Germany was not wholly ideological. The German Foreign Office had given regular financial support to the Bolsheviks in the hope that if they achieved their revolutionary aims, they would pull Russian out of the war.

  1. Describe the Russia that Tsar Nicholas II inherited

    Nicholas II unfortunately inherited a Russia which was undergoing enormous changes in terms of social and economic aspects. The industrialisation of Russia was to be met with serious social problems, for example: unrest, in cities which the authorities either didn't, or couldn't deal with.

  2. How far was the personality of Nicholas II responsible for the instability in Russia ...

    Changes in the world made educated Russians more opposed to Tsarist autocracy. Europe had entered the 20th century at the start of Nicholas' reign and as a result, Europe had undergone progressive changes since the reign of Nicholas's father. For example, by the time of Nicholas's reign, the political systems of western European countries had become more modern.

  1. Assess the View that Nicholas II survived the Revolution of 1905 mainly because of ...

    even the Kadets wanted a more democratic society. The Tsar had numerous opponents the biggest being the Kadets a liberal minded party who wanted to adopt the British system of government. They wanted a democratic nation with a monarchy whilst the biggest left-wing the RSDLP was facing a split between two of its biggest ego?s Vladimir Lenin & Julius Martov.

  2. How important was the Bolshevik threat to Tsardom during the reign of Nicholas II?

    There is little doubt that Lenin himself was not fully trusted when compared to the leadership of the Social Revolutionaries. Lenin also knew that if the Bolsheviks were to have credibility, they had to appeal to the working class in Russia. That meant not making promises that couldn?t be kept.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work