• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How important was the Bolshevik threat to Tsardom in the reign of Nicholas II

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐How important was the Bolshevik threat to Tsardom in the reign of Nicholas II? In order to form an opinion of how important the Bolshevik threat was, we need to clearly understand the many factors that affected the strength of Tsar Nicholas II and his autocratic reign. To avoid being subjective, we must scrutinize primary and secondary sources, evaluate each source based on its reliability and credibility and then apply the correct information to articulate an accurate conclusion. To begin to execute an objective overview that incorporates events, ideas and people that may have influenced Tsarist Russia at the turn of the 20th Century, we need to analyze certain points in history prior and after Nicholas II arrival at Russia?s seat of power. The embarrassing defeat in the Crimean War in 1856 highlighted serious issues in Russia?s industrial, financial and communications structures and therefore became the catalyst for Alexander II (Nicholas II Grandfather) to implement social reforms. The Emancipation of the Serfs in 1861 encouraged a double negative effect on the long term continuation of Tsardom, releasing peasants from slavery and creating a stronger upper lower class in the form of ?Kulaks?. These social reforms also alienated much of the nobility or bourgeoisie that had profited from serfdom, creating resentment at both ends of the social spectrum. ...read more.


Dating from the 1870?s, Populism was a revolutionary movement that drew its members from the middle and upper classes and as a result they regarded it their duty to educate the peasantry. However, the Populist Movement (Narodniki) lacked any tangible success due to peasant hostility, ?the peasants? ignorance, superstition, prejudice and deep-rooted loyalty to the Tsar ensured that by 1874, 1600 populists had been arrested? (Waller, S. 2009). The Social Revolutionaries were a descendant of the Populist Movement and as so their views were similar. They adapted far more than their predecessors and had some minor success, particularly with terrorist acts by blowing up various Ministers between 1901 and 1905. This adept means of propaganda, ?made the Social Revolutionaries seem like a party of action? (Murphy, D. & Morris, T. 2008), but this was little more than superficial bravado. Inspired by the teachings of Karl Marx, the Social Democrats wanted to create a more socially balanced society based on Marx?s Communist Theory. The Social Democratic leader George Plekhanov formed the party in 1898, but many members became disillusioned with his theoretical leadership style and wanted a more proactive approach. The foremost advocate of this approach was Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov, also known as Lenin, ?Lenin envisaged a disciplined and dedicated group of professional revolutionaries which would act as the ?vanguard of the proletariat? (Murphy, D. ...read more.


Pyotr Stolypin became synonymous with the ?Stolypin necktie? as his fields court martial, resulted in many hangings. With the advent of the First World War, the Tsar?s already uncertain future became doomed, due to the length of the war, the millions of casualties that Russia suffered and soaring inflation. The February Revolution of 1917 became the climax of the crisis. Tsardom collapsed from within, none of the generals or politicians fought to save the regime and there was no direct effect from outside revolutionary pressure. To summarise, when Lenin returned to Russia in April 1917, Nicholas had already abdicated, after his position had become untenable and on the advice of high command generals. Lenin persuaded the masses with his ?April Theses? that built up Bolshevik membership and subsequently persuaded the Bolshevik Central Committee to take action in October 1917. The Bolsheviks were dealt a stroke of luck when Alexander Kerensky was appointed Prime Minister, as he was inept and unqualified for such a role at a pivotal time. The threat of the Bolsheviks during the reign of Tsar Nicholas II was extremely minimal. Although they were the most well prepared to seize power, the Bolsheviks were no doubt helped by a string of important events culminating in the First World War. Tsardom self imploded, greatly assisted than any other key point, by the weak and inept Tsar Nicholas II. Words count 1347. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Describe the Russia that Tsar Nicholas II inherited

    From 1850 to 1875, the coal production in Russia more than quintupled from 300,000 tonnes to 1,700,000 tonnes. Although this seems like huge progress, Nicholas II had come to power when Russia needed more resources than the other Great Powers, since the Russian Empire was huge but undeveloped, especially in comparison to Britain.

  2. How Serious Was The Threat Posed To Henry VII By Pretenders To The Throne

    whose threat lasted from 1499-1506. His threat lasted from 1499 to 1506 ans was in my opinion the most dangerous threat to Henry. Following the death of his older brother at the Battle of Stoke, Suffolk became the leading Yorkist claimant to the throne. Henry spared his life and allowed him to succeed to his father's title of Duke of Suffolk in 1491.

  1. The Bolshevik Consolidation of power 1917-21.

    The Foreign Interventions * When Tsardom fell the western allies wondered whether the new regime would keep Russia in the war, as if they pulled out and made a separate peace Germany could pull resources from the eastern front and create more of a challenge for them.

  2. How far was the personality of Nicholas II responsible for the instability in Russia ...

    autocratic form of government and because There was no democracy in Russia in the modern Western sense and this caused great resentment among ordinary people, whether in the cities or in the countryside. Even local government in the form of elected Zemstos had their powers limited by the Zemstra Act,

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    the army strong enough to suppress internal disruptions would beto enter immediately into peace negotiations with the Germans. Speaking at a secret conference of the committees of Foreign Affairs and of National Defense, the minister gave details of the disastrous state of the army: An army of nine and one-half million men cannot be supported by the country....

  2. The Bolshevik Consolidation of Power 1918-21.

    But the remedy which Lenin and Trotsky have found, the elimination of democracy itself, is worse than the disease it is supposed to cure; for it stops up the very living source from which alone can come the correction of all the shortcomings of social institutions.

  1. How well does Alexander II deserve his reputation as The Tsar Liberator(TM)?

    Perhaps the most concrete evidence that the 'Tsar Liberator's' reforms were substandard and certainly not motivated out of devotion to Russia, is Alexander's death. In 1881 The People's Will took extreme action and assassinated the Alexander II; this surely would not have been necessary if like a true liberator, he had considered the lives of his people.

  2. Assess the View that Nicholas II survived the Revolution of 1905 mainly because of ...

    The opponents to the Tsar politically were of course the Left-Wing Party of Socialist-Revolutionaries (SR?s) and at that time before the split the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party (A combination of the Mensheviks & Bolsheviks) even the Kadets wanted a more democratic society.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work