• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How important was the First World War to the collapse of the Tsarist regime?

Extracts from this document...


By Daniel Harrington Candidate no: 5093 15a. How important was the First World War to the collapse of the Tsarist regime? The First World War?s importance to the fall of the Tsar is unquestionable but there were many reason that lead up to the fall of the Tsar so how important was WW1 to the collapse of the Tsar? The brief reasons why Russia even joined the war in the first place were that they believed they were the protectors of the Slav people and therefore ought to protect their freedom from the invading Austrians which then led to Germany declaring war on Russia. There are different interpretations to this question one of them, Lionel Kochan who wrote ?The Making of Modern Russia? in 1962, arguing that the First World War was of major importance in bringing about the fall of the Tsar, stating that workers had already turned against the Tsar, as chaos piled up on the streets of Petrograd. The wave of strikes that the war had caused was more down to a lack of food and supplies for the workers. But the army was important because in 1905 after the Russo-Japanese war, the following workers revolt was put down by the army who were loyal to the Tsar. ...read more.


This would not have made her popular with politicians or solders trying to fight Germany as a new figure head. The Tsarina’s approach to rule was autocratic, and the Tsarina had encouraged Tsar Nicholas to be more autocratic than he previously had been. ‘Smash them all’ she wrote when Duma leader questioned her administration. According to Wern & Stults by the time the Tsar had left to join the front the Duma was left with honest politicians but the Tsarina and Rasputin her ‘man of God’ would change that. This claim that there were honest politicians in the Duma is quite farfetched when they were guilty of being the Tsar’s yes men, only Goremykin could not be trusted according to Wern & Stults, but the Tsarina & Rasputin would bring in Boris Sturmer as Prime Minister and Foreign Minister also they would give away the position of Minister of the interior to Craven and the almost insane Protopopov. The government from this point on would let thing drift to a point where Rasputin would be murdered by the Duma leader Purishkevitch, Grand Duke Dmitri and Prince Felix Yusopov. General Krymov reported to the Duma leaders that the army would welcome a coup d’état after the murder of Rasputin, the Grand Duke Alexander wrote ‘it is the government which is preparing the revolution. ...read more.


But in comparison, Wren & Stults state that the royals had become suspicious of their own government, whilst Richard Pipes puts the Tsars abdication down to the growing discontent amongst the Generals within the Russian Army. Kochan however believed that the government and the people didn?t understand each other and that through government action and the Tsars insistence on continuing the war food prices were driven up to an unaffordable level for most people and the ration?s that the people were given were not enough. Kochan also mentions that the Russian army were running out of ammunition which is embarrassing for a large empire like Russia?s. In conclusion a number of different factors forced the Tsar to abdicate, the fact that the Tsarina allowed Rasputin a more than questionable figure a lot of political power; the fact that the workers even the army had turned against the Tsar; the fact that the Tsar had the power to hire and fire politicians unlike in Britain where a democratically elected government ruled with the support of the Royal family, at the end of the day it was the Tsar?s inability to adapt to a changing situation within Russia cost him his crown and later in 1917 his life and that of his family. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how the effects of the First World War caused the collapse of the ...

    4 star(s)

    Even without the army's support, the Tsarist government would not have collapsed without the revolutionaries. The revolutionaries were mostly workers back at the home front. They had many problems themselves because of the war, and again, blamed the Tsar. The workers' problems were bad enough, but the First World War was the catalyst that pushed them over the edge.

  2. Hitler and the Nazi Regime - revision sheet.

    In 1933 it was taken over by Reich governors and in April 1934 the Nazis established a unified radio system. Goebbels used radio heavily. The radio was mass produced so all could have one to hear propaganda. In 1935 there were 7 million sets and in 1943 there were 16 million.

  1. Vietnam war

    was forced off their land. USA's policy of depriving the BC of a recruiting base by Strategic hamlet construction, defoliation and the use of free-fire zones for massive firepower sent internal refugees crowding around bases and cities. * The slum shanties they built � no water, sewerage or electricity.


    whilst Alvin Jackson notes "the disintegration of Irish Unionism involved considerable internal acrimony."23 The release of interned prisoners altered the face of politics in 1917. Prior to this there had been no single cohesive party to challenge the IPP's 50 year political reign.

  1. How far was the First World War the main cause of the fall of ...

    This immaturity and lack of understanding would hurt his ability to govern Russia as he never gained a sense of confidence and self reliance. Nicholas always thought he was not good enough to rule Russia. He felt as though he didn't have the abilities or the experience, and with his

  2. Why did the Tsar lose power in 1917?

    However Witte?s dismissal in 1906 led to the new comer Stolypin, as both of these men were good at what they did the Tsar?s position was safe, but after Stolypin?s death in 1911 everything went downhill from there on. Stolypin?s death also meant that his reforms were unfulfilled as opposition still existed among the peasants and urban proletariats.

  1. Why did the 1905 revolution fail to overthrow the Tsarist regime?

    The peasants and later workers were the main force behind the revolution, as expected when they occupy 84% of the population. The October Manifesto hadn?t stopped Land Redemption Payments; a wave of peasant unrest reached its peak in November. The deterioration of the economy in the country side played a

  2. Why did the Tsarist regime collapse in 1917?

    Another piece of evidence would be the fact that Russia?s wartime setup was doomed to fail as there was contempt between the Minister of War, and Nicholas Nikolayevich who commanded the armies in the field . A final piece of evidence would be the fact that Russia?s army in World

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work