• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How important was the strength of opposition to impact the New Deal in the period 1933-1937.

Extracts from this document...


Investigation History- The New Deal How important was the strength of opposition to impact the New Deal in the period 1933-1937. The New Deal had serious competition, which was fundamental towards the New Deal particularly in the period of 1933-1937 in numerous ways. There were alternatives which factored towards helping the economy providing radical yet simplistic reforms, several pressure groups also hindered the success of the New Deal, it was scrutinized by both sides of the political spectrum where Hugh Brogan claims the "Left for not doing enough"1 this is true, certain left wing activists such as Francis Townsend2, Father Coughlin3 and Huey Long4 did not enhance their potential to cause everlasting impact. He also claims the "right for doing too much"5 this can be interpreted differently, but I partially agree that the Liberty League tried to prevent the success of the New Deal "as business leaders were not going to help him"6 this suggests the Right aimed to hinder rather than help the New Deal. The strength of opposition had potential to cause serious impact, this varied as some more than others contributed. It is unclear how opposition enforced certain policies, but they certainly cause change to some extent, where many were able to prosper, as it was clear that "society needs reform"7. ...read more.


considered to appeal to mainly the poor, but Roosevelt acknowledged this, I assume Roosevelt used Long's ideas compared to Townsend and Coughlin as he proved that policies actually worked thus most of his policies would have been employed in the New Deal. However he too seemed inadequate, as, "he was not offered a federal post"21 which suggests his contribution to the New Deal would have been minute. His significance in Louisiana was successful however it is questionable if his ideas would be embraced on a national level; I firmly believe his policies would not have been favorable, as it is evident because the 1936 election provided a strong belief in capitalism with 27 million Americans behind Roosevelt also it was suggested that it was "highly improbable"22 that he would of beaten Roosevelt in 1936 election this highlights his weaknesses when facing the New Deal, was not able to generate enough support which was also another problem with many opponents of the New Deal. Certainly from the Left they had "much in common"23 they all disliked Roosevelt, this was stated by Badger which I to some extent agree yet it is deemed that "they all addressed the real problems" and "the real Deal's failings" which supports the assertion of opposition being beneficial, highlighting the failures of the New Deal, clearly ...read more.


can be seen as restraining the success of the New Deal as they declared "11 out of 16 of the alphabet agencies were unconstitutional"31. Roosevelt believed the Supreme Court hindered rather than help the New Deal, Roosevelt tried to use a notion of "court packing"32 where judges over 70 should retire, however this backfired, arguably worsening his reputation, which reflected towards the New Deal badly, also considered to be the "darkest moment"33 of FDR's campaign, yet it is suggested that "Roosevelt responded with compromise"34 based on the context of the supreme court it clearly shows no compromise towards the Republican judges but its impact is shown however their contribution was . Roosevelt did handle his opponents effectively, it is claimed that FDR would "take the fire out of opposing arguments"35 by cooperation, which he successfully did with Townsend and Long, however there were times where he failed to understand the strength of opposition when it comes towards the Supreme Court, he was ambitious to limit their power however he did underestimate the strength In which they condemned Roosevelt's actions. The strongest opposition from the Left would be Huey Long, yet from the right it would be the Liberty League, In conclusion opposition to the New Deal was significant; they demonstrated a variety of alternatives which challenged the New Deal. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Assess the view that the Supreme Court was the most important branch of federal ...

    4 star(s)

    meant that the Supreme Court was held back in the judgements it could make. Under Reagan, however, Congress remained liberal, and was able to push him to accept strengthening of acts such as the Voting Rights Act when renewing them, a move that shows the importance of Congress not only

  2. Peer reviewed

    The New Deal USA

    4 star(s)

    The Cartoonist presents the President and the New Deal as a deception and untrustworthy which implies that Roosevelt was not every American's hero and not everyone was convinced that the New Deal was a success. O'Callaghan writes that "to millions of Americans, [Roosevelt] was the man who had given them jobs" and therefore the New Deal policies were a success.

  1. History essay on the new deal

    FDR also created two agencies to help the farmers as they were one of the heaviest hit by the depression.

  2. Asses the view that Hoovers policies and attitudes in the years 1929-33 merely prolonged ...

    However, taking into account that many countries were in a nation debt, it was obviously not possible for Hoover to magically get a large sum of money in order to give relief to firms and other sectors, thus there was actually a limited amount that Hoover could do even though he did have a hands off approach towards America.

  1. Assess the significance of the influence of internal migration on social and political tensions ...

    The rise of the Republican Party was a consequence of both the Kansas-Nebraska act and Northern fears of the growing power of the slavery movement, both which were caused by the unavoidable need for America to expand due to the high rates of internal migration.

  2. Roosevelt's New Deal

    and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) of 1933 (provided an insurance of deposits in banks to a maximum of $100,000 per depositor, which meant that if the banks crashed, the government would compensate for the individuals' deposited money). This boosted the public's confidence and bank deposits, which restored the

  1. Revision notes - the USA 1945 to 1980

    These laws enforced segregation in almost every sphere of public life. Parks, transport, schools, cinemas, toilets, cafes and restaurants, were all segregated between black and white. Black Americans could expect to have worse schooling and no access to good universities.

  2. Evaluate The Presidency Of Theodore Roosevelt.

    Roosevelt developed what became known as the Roosevelt Corollary. This was significant as it updated the Monroe Doctrine (which stated that world was divided into two hemispheres, and warned Europe that it did not have the right to intervene in the Western hemisphere, which was assumed to be owned by

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work