• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How important were ideological differences in the split between the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia in 1948?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

HOW IMPORTANT WERE IDEOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES IN THE SPLIT BETWEEN THE SOVIET UNION AND YUGOSLAVIA IN 1948? "By saying 'No!' to Stalin, Tito stood on his own two feet for the first time in the world of politics. And henceforth, his glittering political leadership was no longer a mere reflection of Stalin's sun...From that moment on, Tito now represented the sun for most Yugolavs...Serpens nisi serpentem comederit non fit draco - a snake cannot become a dragon until it has eaten another snake."1 In this Soviet-Yugoslav conflict, the Yugoslav leadership antagonised the most powerful figure of the international socialist movement at the time - Stalin - by asserting Yugoslavia's right as an independent country. Stalin was furious at their "impertinent insubordination"2 and expelled them from the socialist community. The Yugoslav leaders, however, had been brought up to believe that the USSR was at the vanguard of the communist movement, and they never imagined that they would ever do anything to be ostracised by the Soviet Union. After some strenuous moments within the Yugoslav leadership, Tito finally decided not to give in to Soviet pressure, for the Yugoslavs felt that they had been unfairly accused of wrongdoing. Tito was not going to be subjected to the dictates of Stalin, even if he was considered to be the leader of the world communist movement, because, "as much as [he] loved the Soviet Union, [he] could not love his country less."3 Tito's decision to break from Stalin's control was not only backed by his closest advisers, but by most of the population of Yugoslavia. ...read more.

Middle

The Yugoslavs realised that this was a means for the Soviets to gradually assume control of their economy. The Soviets wanted to create these joint-stock companies in such sectors of production as steel, iron, and non-ferrous metals. Their real intention was to prevent Yugoslavia's industrialisation by extracting raw materials from it through these companies. The Yugoslavs rejected all the proposals. The Soviets also proposed a plan for a joint-stock bank, which in reality would have been a Soviet agency on Yugoslav soil. The bank would have given the Soviets access to the Yugoslav central financing and credit allocations. Much to the Soviet's anger, the Yugoslav leadership also rejected this proposal. The two sides only agreed upon the creation of a joint air transportation company and a joint river shipping company. The new airline called 'Justa' took over all the major air routes to and from Yugoslavia, relegating the state carrier JAT (Jugoslovenski AeroTransport) to a secondary role. The river shipping company 'Juspad' was equally as exploitative, because the Soviets appropriated Yugoslav vessels and used their shipyards without contributing a single ship. The Yugoslavs protested, but Stalin tried to assuage their complaints with the promise of a huge credit for capital goods, a promise that never saw itself come true. Aside from economic issues, Stalin was very annoyed at Yugoslavia's efforts to establish good relations with other Balkan countries, especially with those that had fought alongside the Axis powers during World War Two. ...read more.

Conclusion

In January 1949, Yugoslavia even applied to join the Council for Mutual Economic Aid (CMEA). Stalin turned Yugoslavia's application down. The Soviet Union directed its satellite countries to take part in an economic blockade of Yugoslavia. On July 1, 1948, Albania already terminated economic relations with its northern neighbour. By the autumn, all the Soviet bloc countries removed their trade agreements with Yugoslavia. In January 1949 Moscow told Belgrade that its capital goods agreement was no longer valid because "conditions had changed."14 This gravely affected the Yugoslav economy because the 5-Year Plan was in progress, and the sudden stop of the deliveries of machinery and fertilisers from the Soviet Union hampered the attempts for a successful collectivisation of agriculture. "In sum, a raw struggle for political power in Yugoslavia lay at the bottom of the Tito - Stalin split."15 However, According to Yugoslav testimony, ideological differences "played no significant role."16 From the evidence, it seems that they have a case, from the issue of Soviet interference to the coercion of the Yugoslav press and the economic factors including the wish to break away from economic deals with Russia. However, this could be a great disguise; a method by which Tito can pursue his ideology, one which Stalin did not approve of or trusted. Tito himself led this ideological attack against Stalin because he had lived the interwar years when the Soviet Union was the only socialist state in the world, and all eyes looked towards Moscow for guidance and support. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    This became known as the Brezhnev Doctrine. The new Soviet leader therefore did not come across as wanting to do business. After the success of Cuba, Kennedy was more convinced than ever that it was better to stand up to communism rather than offer compromises: o Kennedy had stepped up US involvement in Vietnam considerably.

  2. How far sas the Sino-Soviet Split of the late 1960s the result of ideological ...

    The Ussuri River Dispute most serious example of armed conflict between the two communist powers, according to Soviet sources it resulted in the loss of 60 and 800 Russian and Chinese soldiers respectively. The incident was partly triggered by China's 'active defence' strategy, as Soviet forces initially suffered the heaviest

  1. The Sino-Soviet Split

    grew substantially over this issue, but on the whole he achieved what he had set out to achieve and went home a relatively happy man. Tensions did not subside, however, and conflict flared up again as Stalin insensitively proposed that a series of Soviet funded joint ventures be initiated in Northern China.

  2. Khrushchev's attempts at modernisation.

    immediately began arms limitation talks in the hope of gaining financial aid from the West. Gorbachev promised a very great deal and yet his reforms did not deliver as much as he had promised. In fact there was very little improvement in the economy or in the living conditions of ordinary Soviet citizens.

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    tell you," he wrote Churchill in 1942, "[that] I think I can personally handle Stalin better than either your Foreign Office or my State Department. Stalin hates the guts of all your top people. He thinks he likes me better, and I hope he will continue to do so."

  2. What were the causes of the disintegration of the Soviet Union as a socialist ...

    These are theoretical reasons why the Soviet Union could never have succeeded, long term inherent flaws within the system that grew over time and Gorbachevian reforms. Each of these will be examined in turn, and their merits assessed before conclusions are drawn as to which combination of them brought about

  1. American History.

    - Like the Pilgrims, he also stressed community, equality, and their covenant w/God, which required them to create a model "city upon a hill." Later on, more formal institutions echoed the ideals expressed in the speech, for the General Court, which originally governed the Company, was changed into a colonial legislature.

  2. The role of partisan politics in the spread of McCarthyism

    Reeves, and The Age of Anxiety: McCarthyism to Terrorism by Haynes Johnson. McCarthyism is essentially a collection of 12 short essays and excerpts by 14 different historians ranging in time periods from the early 1950s to the early 1970s, compiled and edited by Thomas C.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work