• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How important were ideological differences in the split between the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia in 1948?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

HOW IMPORTANT WERE IDEOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES IN THE SPLIT BETWEEN THE SOVIET UNION AND YUGOSLAVIA IN 1948? "By saying 'No!' to Stalin, Tito stood on his own two feet for the first time in the world of politics. And henceforth, his glittering political leadership was no longer a mere reflection of Stalin's sun...From that moment on, Tito now represented the sun for most Yugolavs...Serpens nisi serpentem comederit non fit draco - a snake cannot become a dragon until it has eaten another snake."1 In this Soviet-Yugoslav conflict, the Yugoslav leadership antagonised the most powerful figure of the international socialist movement at the time - Stalin - by asserting Yugoslavia's right as an independent country. Stalin was furious at their "impertinent insubordination"2 and expelled them from the socialist community. The Yugoslav leaders, however, had been brought up to believe that the USSR was at the vanguard of the communist movement, and they never imagined that they would ever do anything to be ostracised by the Soviet Union. After some strenuous moments within the Yugoslav leadership, Tito finally decided not to give in to Soviet pressure, for the Yugoslavs felt that they had been unfairly accused of wrongdoing. Tito was not going to be subjected to the dictates of Stalin, even if he was considered to be the leader of the world communist movement, because, "as much as [he] loved the Soviet Union, [he] could not love his country less."3 Tito's decision to break from Stalin's control was not only backed by his closest advisers, but by most of the population of Yugoslavia. ...read more.

Middle

The Yugoslavs realised that this was a means for the Soviets to gradually assume control of their economy. The Soviets wanted to create these joint-stock companies in such sectors of production as steel, iron, and non-ferrous metals. Their real intention was to prevent Yugoslavia's industrialisation by extracting raw materials from it through these companies. The Yugoslavs rejected all the proposals. The Soviets also proposed a plan for a joint-stock bank, which in reality would have been a Soviet agency on Yugoslav soil. The bank would have given the Soviets access to the Yugoslav central financing and credit allocations. Much to the Soviet's anger, the Yugoslav leadership also rejected this proposal. The two sides only agreed upon the creation of a joint air transportation company and a joint river shipping company. The new airline called 'Justa' took over all the major air routes to and from Yugoslavia, relegating the state carrier JAT (Jugoslovenski AeroTransport) to a secondary role. The river shipping company 'Juspad' was equally as exploitative, because the Soviets appropriated Yugoslav vessels and used their shipyards without contributing a single ship. The Yugoslavs protested, but Stalin tried to assuage their complaints with the promise of a huge credit for capital goods, a promise that never saw itself come true. Aside from economic issues, Stalin was very annoyed at Yugoslavia's efforts to establish good relations with other Balkan countries, especially with those that had fought alongside the Axis powers during World War Two. ...read more.

Conclusion

In January 1949, Yugoslavia even applied to join the Council for Mutual Economic Aid (CMEA). Stalin turned Yugoslavia's application down. The Soviet Union directed its satellite countries to take part in an economic blockade of Yugoslavia. On July 1, 1948, Albania already terminated economic relations with its northern neighbour. By the autumn, all the Soviet bloc countries removed their trade agreements with Yugoslavia. In January 1949 Moscow told Belgrade that its capital goods agreement was no longer valid because "conditions had changed."14 This gravely affected the Yugoslav economy because the 5-Year Plan was in progress, and the sudden stop of the deliveries of machinery and fertilisers from the Soviet Union hampered the attempts for a successful collectivisation of agriculture. "In sum, a raw struggle for political power in Yugoslavia lay at the bottom of the Tito - Stalin split."15 However, According to Yugoslav testimony, ideological differences "played no significant role."16 From the evidence, it seems that they have a case, from the issue of Soviet interference to the coercion of the Yugoslav press and the economic factors including the wish to break away from economic deals with Russia. However, this could be a great disguise; a method by which Tito can pursue his ideology, one which Stalin did not approve of or trusted. Tito himself led this ideological attack against Stalin because he had lived the interwar years when the Soviet Union was the only socialist state in the world, and all eyes looked towards Moscow for guidance and support. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    All these options ran the risk of provoking a war with the USSR. To do nothing was not an option. Kennedy could not allow the presence of Soviet missiles in Cuba o It wasn't really that they threatened US security: Soviet long-range missiles could already destroy American cities: all the

  2. The role of partisan politics in the spread of McCarthyism

    The book's limitation, however is that, while it does an admirable job covering the complexities of McCarthyism, there is no simple timeline or overview of events to refer to in order to understand several of the highly specific excerpts. The Age of Anxiety: McCarthyism to Terrorism is written by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Haynes Johnson.

  1. Khrushchev's attempts at modernisation.

    Western politicians, including Margaret Thatcher, were even interviewed on Soviet Russian television! 1999: Describe the key features of 'Perestroika' (5) Perestroika (restructuring) was an attempt to reform the slow moving and cumbersome Soviet economy before it collapsed. It encouraged a measure of free enterprise and small private firms were allowed to compete with those run by the state.

  2. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    Earlier, Harriman had been well disposed toward the Soviet leadership, enthusiastically endorsing Russian interest in a postwar loan and advocating cooperation wherever possible. But now Harriman perceived a hardening of Soviet attitudes and a more aggressive posture toward control over Eastern Europe.

  1. UNIT 6: PAPER 6b: THE SOVIET UNION AFTER LENIN

    The economy * The two issues of Industrialisation and the NEP bitterly divided many communists. * The New Economic Policy was seen by many as a defeat, as giving in to the peasants and capitalists. * Lenin had described it as a temporary measure to rebuild the shattered war-torn economy but how long was temporary?

  2. How far sas the Sino-Soviet Split of the late 1960s the result of ideological ...

    In response, the Chinese developed a strategy of 'active defence' which involved a pre-emptive strike against the USSR when the position of their forces was advantageous. This strategy, combined with the leaders' failure to negotiate, resulted in the Ussuri River Dispute.

  1. The Sino-Soviet Split

    a new Treaty of Friendship and Alliance be drafted to replace the old one signed by the Soviet Union and the GMD. When the Chinese leader traveled to Moscow to discuss this issue, Stalin did not even turn up at the station to meet him, a disrespectful gesture which deeply wounded Mao's dignity.

  2. American History.

    - The headright system stated that every new arrival paying their way could get 50 acres of land. Although this in itself encouraged wealthier people to move to the colonies, it also allowed the already established planters to get labor and land at once.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work