• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How important were the events at Mnster 1534-5 in causing the failure of the Radical Reformation ?

Extracts from this document...


How important were the events at M�nster 1534-5 in causing the failure of the Radical Reformation? M�nster played a big role in causing the failure of the Radical Reformation but was not the sole reason. M�nster was an example of how a town could be overridden by a few people who preached what the authorities wanted to hear. It was the actions of the few involved that truly set off the destruction of the Radical Reformation. It was, however, not the only reason as the Radical Reformation and the Anabaptists were doomed from the start. It was in the very essence of Anabaptism that caused them to be persecuted and things were only made worse with their belief in 'nachfolge' (salvation through suffering). There were so many different groups that the only reason they were called the 'Anabaptists' was that they all loosely believed in adult baptism, with the rest of their beliefs varying. Also, they seemed so much of a threat that the Catholics and Protestants thought that they should band together to fight them off. Yes, the Anabaptists never had a chance. So what happened at M�nster? Well, in 1531 the Catholic Bishop had been run out of the town by Lutheran preachers who began to start reforming the town. Then in January 1534 Anabaptist missionaries visited and baptised many of the Lutheran Town Council. ...read more.


It was in the very essence of Anabaptism however that was the prime reason for the failure of the Radical Reformation. They had the ability to split towns apart and cause great mayhem. There were many social and political threats from the Anabaptists, whether this was just speculation by secular authorities or whether they actually wanted to cause harm was not the concern of these princes, they were to be stomped out as fast as possible. The authorities did not like the diversity that the Anabaptists represented as they would not be able to control them efficiently. They did not like their semi communist style of living as this was a definite threat to the hierarchy. Also if they weren't a member of the Church in the way the rest of the Christians were, then they would not be paying tithes or anything towards the Church. The political side was no different, there was plenty of evidence to suggest that the Anabaptists were a liability and that they were a threat to the safety of the people. The Peasants War and the events at M�nster proved their danger sufficiently to any leader and so id didn't matter what the rest of the people were like as they knew what they were capable of. ...read more.


"They were a religion of the poor and artisan class" - Stanton. In conclusion the Radical Reformation was never going to work as the seeds had already been sewed in their own destruction. The events at M�nster were an example of things that could come. After that, no-one would trust the Anabaptists and so would never be accepted. This was all down to the work of the few like M�nzer, the Zwickau Prophets and Bockelson. Their belief that when they were persecuted this was a sign of them getting closer to salvation did not help them one bit as when authorities would shoo them away they did not see the bad in this and so continued as they did before. The organisation of the man many different sections did not exist and the beliefs of the different groups were so varied that they would never have been able to work together anyway. There was no support from princes and even if they did the with the Catholic and Protestant forces teaming up, they wouldn't have had a chance. The events at M�nster were important to showing other people the extreme side of Anabaptism but there was already too much in their beliefs that was not liked by many secular authorities and so their downfall was their beliefs themselves so basically whatever they did, they were doomed to fail. Ollie Plunkett Sunday, 17 January 2010 Ollie Plunkett Sunday, 17 January 2010 1 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This is a well focused piece that debates the question well and offers multiple reasons for the movement's failure. There are numerous grammatical errors and quotations could be better integrated but the author's overall understanding is strong.

4 Stars

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 24/10/2014

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Early Jamestown: Why Did So Many Colonists Die? In early Jamestown, from 1607 ...

    They did this because they believed that the waste would wash away but it "tended to fester rather than flush away" according to document A by Dennis B.

  2. How important was the Council of Trent to the reform of the Catholic Church

    The Council of Trent was used as a method of Counter Reformation and allowed the Catholics to resist and turn back the increasing Protestant advance and attempts at reform. Although the Council of Trent was important it was unable to agree a compromise with Protestant churches.

  1. Why did so many people go on the first crusade

    as the provisions and armour required cost huge amounts approximately two years income for a knight, it is also evident that many knights did not go to the holy land for land, there is evidence that the knights left charters with the local monasteries or churches that they would look after the land whilst they were away fighting.

  2. Why Did The Wartime Alliance Break Down?

    However, as this organisation was set up before the three leaders joined together, the USSR was not included, and therefore Stalin believed that this was done on purpose, that America still did not trust the USSR. Furthermore, at the Tehran Conference of 1943, confusion was also shown.

  1. Why did bolsheviks win civil war

    The success of the Bolsheviks coordinated attacks on the White Armies was also down to the qualities of their leaders, in particular, Lenin and Trotsky. Lenin had led the Bolsheviks to victory in the October Revolution and throughout the Civil War provided the energy and drive needed to inspire success,

  2. What was the impact of the Norman Conquest

    Despite its thoroughness, it was prepared in an unstable period when fortunes of several families were changing.1 It also briefly mentions some names that never seem to crop up in history ever again. Yet nowadays it is still used by historians as a tremendous piece of evidence and reveals an excellent insight into England's wealth at the time.

  1. 'Collectivisation was a political success but an economic failure and a human disaster'

    Peasants reacted to the seizure of their grain by burning their houses, slaughtering livestock and eating what food they had left in protest. Socially, collectivization had already gotten off to a bad start; many peasants were not willing to cooperate with the new communist ideas and enthusiastic activists who had suddenly appeared in their villages preaching the new methods.

  2. Why did the United States fail to win the Vietnam War?

    Thus US counter-insurgency tactics, for instance Search and Destroy missions, didn't work. Additionally, air bombing campaigns such as Operation Rolling Thunder were ineffective against the rural based economy and lacked specific military and industrial targets, like that in North Vietnam.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work