• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Important Were The Policies Of Gorbachev In Bringing An End To The Cold War In Europe?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How Important Were The Policies Of Gorbachev In Bringing An End To The Cold War In Europe? In 1985, Mikhail Gorbachev became the new leader of the Soviet Union. His new policies had an impact on Eastern Europe. As he was from a younger generation, his viewpoint on Communism and the Soviet state differed from previous Soviet leaders. His policies aimed to make the Communist Party more responsive and to liberalise the faltering economy. In effect, he called from an end to the Cold War. His policies were only one factor in bringing an end to the Cold War and other factors such as his new approach, his attitudes and Western pressure eventually led to the end of the Cold War. Gorbachev wanted to change the Soviet Union for several reasons. Firstly, the Soviet Unions economy was extremely weak. Its expenditure on the arms race was too much and the war with Afghanistan was unwinnable. Previously, there had been no new thinking about how to run the Soviet economy since the days of Stalin. Each leader had followed the same policies and ignored and warnings that the economy was in trouble. Gerontocracy was used to describe the Soviet leadership between 190-1985. ...read more.

Middle

Although not directly a great factor in bringing an end to the Cold War, it is still a considerable factor. It didn't straight away contribute to ending the Cold War; it allowed the first seeds to be planted in order for the Cold War to thaw. Another factor, which led to the end of the Cold War, was when the Soviet troops were withdrawn from Afghanistan. This had been draining Soviet resources and money and it was simply unwinnable. Over 15,000 Red Army soldiers were killed in the war, costing $8 billion per year. Supporting communist regimes in Cuba and Vietnam had again drained Soviet resources. The USSR had spent $40 billion annually constructing communist governments throughout the world. This was a waste; the money could have been used to promote domestic reform. This new political thinking led to warming relations with the West. A summit between President Reagan of America and Gorbachev was arranged in Geneva, November 1985. Although little was decided at the summit, it instead established a connection and rapport between the two leaders. Even though Reagan hated the Soviets, he liked Gorbachev. As a result, Gorbachev, realising they were fast losing in the Arms Race, proposed nuclear disarmament which took the USA by surprise. ...read more.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Gorbachev played an important role in ending the Cold War. His policies of openness and reconstruction in terms of Perestroika and Glasnost helped the economy of the Soviet Union, helping numerous lives and improving lifestyles. However, his policies also contributed greatly to the end of the Soviet Union. However, Gorbachev was important in the fact that he realised in his thinking that the Cold War was pointless; it was no longer worth fighting for. In effect, it seems for the Cold War to come to an end, the USSR Empire had to be eradicated, which it was. It wasn't able to sustain the resources needed to keep their empire, such as keeping up the arms race of fighting the war in Afghanistan. The Cold War was all about conflicting ideologies. Therefore, if one ideology collapsed - Communism from the Soviet Union, then there was no more competition and there was no more point of a Cold War. Gorbachev's policies in effect led to the collapse of Communism, therefore he inadvertedly led to the end of the Cold War. His policies were important as they led to the collapse of Communism, but instead, new political thinking, such as ending the arms race, nuclear disarmament, abandoning Communism in Eastern Europe and extending hands of friendships were more important in bringing an end to the Cold War. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. South African Heritage - Where we come from?

    Africa and that the African man was here thousands of years before the white man which obviously would not have gone down well with the Apartheid government. Another reason may have been the possible link to the Neanderthal would have been against their principles of theology which were against evolution,

  2. The Third English Civil War

    Thence he despatched Lambert with a cavalry corps to harass the invaders. Harrison was already at Newcastle picking the best of the county mounted-troops to add to his own regulars. On August 9, Charles was at Kendal, Lambert hovering in his rear, and Harrison marching swiftly to bar his way at the Mersey.

  1. Who was more important in bringing about the end of Apartheid and minority rule ...

    South Africa was a democratic country which relied on its trade and when countries decided to carry out boycotts against them it affected their economic state very badly. Countries refused to buy and sell good to/from South Africa until they decided to end apartheid.

  2. A direct comparison of the role of central power and control during the late ...

    However the implementation of such a plan under the control of one man was overly ambitious, hence the establishment of Gosplan, still a centrally run and controlled body. Under Khrushchev the Sovnarkhozy, 105 regional economic councils, saw power spread much more countrywide.

  1. To What Extent was World War Two the Key Turning Point in Britain's Relationship ...

    After this, in 1920, the Khilafat movement called for a campaign of non-cooperation. Though this was called off by Gandhi in 1922 amid growing violence but by this time the Congress had been transformed in to a mass movement and the British began to see that they would have to start moving towards Indian self-governance.

  2. The First English Civil War

    a small scale in many districts; each side endeavouring to secure, or to deny to the enemy, fortified country-houses, territory, and above all arms and money. Peace negotiations went on in the midst of these minor events, until there came from the Parliament an ultimatum, so aggressive as to fix

  1. Louis XIV's fondness of war resulted his downfall

    Louis made five blunders, all sufficient causes which added up to make it enough for war to occur. He said that Philip D'Angou could become French King, he invaded the Dutch barrier fortresses, he moved troops into Milan, and he acquired the asiento (slave trade)

  2. Evidence for the Trojan War.

    Mycenae was a powerful city during the 13th century. It is evident that Mycenae was a prosperous, flourishing civilisation. As described by Homer, Mycenae was "rich in gold". After his pursuits in Troy, Schliemann excavated the well-known site of Mycenae and found various pieces of evidence to support Homer's observations.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work