• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Important Were The Policies Of Gorbachev In Bringing An End To The Cold War In Europe?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How Important Were The Policies Of Gorbachev In Bringing An End To The Cold War In Europe? In 1985, Mikhail Gorbachev became the new leader of the Soviet Union. His new policies had an impact on Eastern Europe. As he was from a younger generation, his viewpoint on Communism and the Soviet state differed from previous Soviet leaders. His policies aimed to make the Communist Party more responsive and to liberalise the faltering economy. In effect, he called from an end to the Cold War. His policies were only one factor in bringing an end to the Cold War and other factors such as his new approach, his attitudes and Western pressure eventually led to the end of the Cold War. Gorbachev wanted to change the Soviet Union for several reasons. Firstly, the Soviet Unions economy was extremely weak. Its expenditure on the arms race was too much and the war with Afghanistan was unwinnable. Previously, there had been no new thinking about how to run the Soviet economy since the days of Stalin. Each leader had followed the same policies and ignored and warnings that the economy was in trouble. Gerontocracy was used to describe the Soviet leadership between 190-1985. ...read more.

Middle

Although not directly a great factor in bringing an end to the Cold War, it is still a considerable factor. It didn't straight away contribute to ending the Cold War; it allowed the first seeds to be planted in order for the Cold War to thaw. Another factor, which led to the end of the Cold War, was when the Soviet troops were withdrawn from Afghanistan. This had been draining Soviet resources and money and it was simply unwinnable. Over 15,000 Red Army soldiers were killed in the war, costing $8 billion per year. Supporting communist regimes in Cuba and Vietnam had again drained Soviet resources. The USSR had spent $40 billion annually constructing communist governments throughout the world. This was a waste; the money could have been used to promote domestic reform. This new political thinking led to warming relations with the West. A summit between President Reagan of America and Gorbachev was arranged in Geneva, November 1985. Although little was decided at the summit, it instead established a connection and rapport between the two leaders. Even though Reagan hated the Soviets, he liked Gorbachev. As a result, Gorbachev, realising they were fast losing in the Arms Race, proposed nuclear disarmament which took the USA by surprise. ...read more.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Gorbachev played an important role in ending the Cold War. His policies of openness and reconstruction in terms of Perestroika and Glasnost helped the economy of the Soviet Union, helping numerous lives and improving lifestyles. However, his policies also contributed greatly to the end of the Soviet Union. However, Gorbachev was important in the fact that he realised in his thinking that the Cold War was pointless; it was no longer worth fighting for. In effect, it seems for the Cold War to come to an end, the USSR Empire had to be eradicated, which it was. It wasn't able to sustain the resources needed to keep their empire, such as keeping up the arms race of fighting the war in Afghanistan. The Cold War was all about conflicting ideologies. Therefore, if one ideology collapsed - Communism from the Soviet Union, then there was no more competition and there was no more point of a Cold War. Gorbachev's policies in effect led to the collapse of Communism, therefore he inadvertedly led to the end of the Cold War. His policies were important as they led to the collapse of Communism, but instead, new political thinking, such as ending the arms race, nuclear disarmament, abandoning Communism in Eastern Europe and extending hands of friendships were more important in bringing an end to the Cold War. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. To What Extent Was The South African War (1899 - 1902) A Capitalist War

    It is possible however to accept both these arguments as fact and still agree that the South African War was overridingly driven by capitalism. Less than twenty years after J. A. Hobson published his account of the Boer War, The War in South Africa.

  2. South African Heritage - Where we come from?

    Archaeological evidence can also aid us in understanding more about ancient animals that roamed the earth and how they became extinct. Disadvantages include religious opposition and inaccurate details and results.

  1. The First English Civil War

    that of the Parliamentary party, in the clothing towns of the West Riding, and also in the important seaport of Hull. The Yorkshire gentry made an attempt to neutralise the county, but a local struggle soon began, and Newcastle thereupon prepared to invade Yorkshire.

  2. To What Extent was World War Two the Key Turning Point in Britain's Relationship ...

    There was some discontent and with improved education, expectations of being granted independence grew. The war led to economic development in British Africa. Britain developed a policy of 'new imperialism' which aimed to make the colonies more economically efficient. However, while much investment was promised to the Africans, little was actually done, increasing discontent.

  1. The structures of the Soviet State were created by Lenin and abused by Stalin. ...

    terror, allowing defeated Menshevik leaders to emigrate; refraining from killing his own men; and having the excuse of a Civil War threatening the Russian regime, Stalin had no qualms about killing old Bolsheviks, his own men and sending troops abroad to kill Trotsky.

  2. Who was more important in bringing about the end of Apartheid and minority rule ...

    South Africa was a democratic country which relied on its trade and when countries decided to carry out boycotts against them it affected their economic state very badly. Countries refused to buy and sell good to/from South Africa until they decided to end apartheid.

  1. To what extent were Mussolini's economic policies successful in the years 1922-40?

    Agriculture remained another key aspect of Italy?s economy, and became increasingly important as Mussolini enacted the policy of autarky, self-sufficiency for the war effort. Initially, like the industrial policies this was a minor success, with the north increasing wheat yields by 50% more wheat per acre of land.

  2. Despite frequent changes in policy, Russian and Soviet governments were spectacularly unsuccessful in securing ...

    km to around fifty three km worth of track.[8] With Witte at the helm, Russia?s industry continued to develop with growth rates comparing well next to those of the United States and Germany. Witte has often been credited with modernizing Russia to such a great extent that its industrial boom

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work