• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How important were the Zollverein in changing the balance of power between Austria and Prussia?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐How important were the Zollverein in changing the balance of power between Austria and Prussia? The Zollverein were very important in changing the balance of power from Austria to Prussia. This is because Prussia now influenced the Germanic states more than Austria and provided a form of unification, of which there was much demand from the German people. In addition, after the formation of the zollverein, Prussia grew economically stronger each year while Austria grew weaker. Although there are other factors involved in the deteriation of Austria, the Zollverein had a big part to play here. The Austrian delegate to the Diet of the confederation said " The Zollverein is one of the chief nails in the coffin of the German confederation and Prussia is now taking over the actual leadership of Germany." Since this is a reliable source, it suggests that it played an important role in the downfall of the Austrian rule over the Germanic states as Austria went from having a major influence over the Germanic states to "Austria's Leadership being merely formal." ...read more.

Middle

Austria wanted to stop Liberalism and Nationalism in order to secure their control of the German states how ever In 1815 Metternich became worried about the growth of Liberal and Nationalist student societies while 1819 Carlsbad Decrees banned student societies and censored newspapers and the following year the power of the Diet was increased so that soldiers could be ordered to stop the spread of new ideas in any of the German States. Revolutions of 1848 were the first attempt to challenge Austria?s political power in Germany. A new German parliament was started in Frankfurt how ever it failed. The Zollverein was arguably the core of these actions as it, in a way encouraged Nationalism and Socialism thus causing these uprisings as the Zollverein was a prototype of a ?united Germany? under Prussian control that excluded Austria and helped the country become more powerful, since it was a was a major breakthrough for economic unification within Germany. More evidence to show that the zollverein were successful in changing the economic balance of power between Austria and Prussia is that the Austrian minister of commerce said, "Austria has, above all, one thing to prevent, namely that the Zollverein." ...read more.

Conclusion

In turn this helped to increase Prussia's power both economically and in military terms and made it more capable of challenging Austria. Another reason as to why Prussia gained power was due to the victory against Austria (1866) however this factor is not as important as the zollverein as the zollverein helped Prussia to actually become strong enough to challenge Austria. In conclusion The Zollverein was very important in changing the balance of power between Austria and Prussia and was the most important factor in doing so. This is because the Zollverein made it possible for Prussia to stand up to Austria economically and provide a small form of unification making Germany more likely to withstand an invasion from Austria later on and increase it's economic power so it would be able to economically challenge Austria as well. This obviously increases Germany's power and in turn slightly cripples Austria as it isolates Austria from the Zollverein and in this form slightly cripple it economically. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. To what extent were technological changes the biggest feature in the changing nature of ...

    Christian and believed when soldiers died they went to a better place, and that they were lucky to be killed. This obviously doesn't mean he intended soldiers to die, but it can help understand his mindset. 'Haig was a cavalry officer.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    It was a costly defeat for the Nazis. It broke the myth of invincibility that they had fostered. It appeared to contemporaries that the Nazis had peaked in July and then had lost much of their political momentum. By the end of 1932 the Nazi party seemed at an important crossroads.

  1. Why was Prussia able to win the war with Austria in 1866?

    Erfurt scheme and Fredrick William IV was not willing to use force to defend it hence it was doomed. This shows the positions of Austria and Prussia perfectly, Austria wanted to continue its control over Germany and was willing to use force to do so but Prussia accustomed to second

  2. Why did Prussia rather than Austria lead the unification of Germany?

    be a necessary step for the liberalisation of the state and administration. Bismarck's establishment of the North German Confederation was a great step towards this goal. In this way the liberals were silenced, and the victory was seen as a victory over the Catholic/Lutheran/Calvinist Austria.6 In the Landtag elections of July 1866 the Prussian's went to the polls on (coincidentally)

  1. To what extent was the political unification of Germany due to:- (a) The growth ...

    In May of 1848, The National Assembly (or the Frankfurt Assembly) was called together in Frankfurt to prepare for this "unification". After disagreements between Prussia and Austria, Prussia decided to try to unify Germany under their kleindeutsch plan, which would include all of the German states except Austria, with Prussia in control.

  2. Who gained the most from the Lichfield House Compact

    It was actually a form of deception as the people were not aware of how much they were 56. In realisation it actually secured the position of the tithe. The British had been sneaky and had gained one up on O'Connell.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work