• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How India's campaign for independence changed as a result of World War 1.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How India's campaign for independence changed as a result of World War 1 The First World War had a drastic impact on India's relations with Britain. India's campaign for independence became for more supported and as a result of this they led a far more confident campaign for independence by the end of World War 1. The Home Rule League and the Lucknow Pact, and radical unpopular British laws that were made to control their power such as the Rowlatt Acts and the Government of India Act of 1919. First of all, it's important to see how it all started, and how India contributed to the war. ...read more.

Middle

Many Indians began to lose some illusions about Britain. Indian troops returned to their villages with stories that the British troops were not always victorious in battle. They could be beaten like anyone else. The Indians were holding out for more rights and freedom after the war. The Home Rule League was a self government led by tilak in 1915. This was made up by tilak, because he wanted to make another political party to go head to head against the British party. The Lucknow Pact was an alliance between Hindu's and the Muslim. They joined together because it would have made them stronger. The British weren't very happy with what was happening. The British weren't happy about what was happening at all. ...read more.

Conclusion

There was an increasing amount of unrest in India at the time. The British could detain people without trial. The Rowlatt Acts were continued from the Defence of India Act. These were important factors that happened during the war. These were all very important stages in the build up for India's campaign for independence. The changes and the development for the campaign were largely significant in 1 way or another. The reaction of the Indian's changed significantly from when the war started when they were enthusiastic and when the British introduced new laws the Indian's were furious. The Indian's were given more rights and more say but Indian's were at a point where they said that was not enough for them and that they wanted complete freedom. The Indian's were determined to get Home Rule. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. British Imperialism in India.

    Gandhi was born in western India raised in a Hindu family. H was a wise man, he was a lawyer educated in Britain and like many educated Indian's he wanted his country to be free from Britain's tyranny. In 1920 he had become a leader in the Indian independence movement as well as in the Indian National Congress.

  2. To what extent was independence a gift from Britain.

    The later mention of India possibly becoming 'a running sore which will sap the strength of the British Empire'4 further suggests the lack of any economic basis for Britain holding onto India. One of the primary reasons for this was that the prosperity and efficiency of the Raj rested with

  1. In What Ways If Any Did Life On the Home Front Change As a ...

    This caused a lot of trouble in the Government because it was against the general policy of the Liberal Party to interfere in some then people's lives and therefore taking away their freedom. Source G3 helps us to understand the Conscription act and the effects that it had on certain

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Bashir Gemayel concluded, however, that such overt collusion with the IDF would prejudice his chances to become president, and he reneged on the promises he had made. Israel maintained the siege of Beirut for seventy days, unleashing a relentless barrage of air, naval, and artillery bombardment.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work