• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How likely was Italian Unification before 1848?

Extracts from this document...


How likely was Italian Unification before 1848? Plan Unlikely Vienna Treaty Revolutions Localised Austrian Army influence Mistrust of Working class, not MASS revolutions Lower classes welcome back monarchy Lack of national co-ordination Intellectuals - no agreement and inaccessibility No agreement on state format between political groups, liberals, radicals Secret organisations, structure, social representation Likely New moderate pope-Gioberti Charles Albert? Even a federation seemed along way off Emergence of Piedmont The areas that encompass modern day Italy after 1815 and the treaty of Vienna were a series of states mostly, either directly or indirectly, under the control of Austria and the fearsome Austrian chancellor Metternich. Unification of the States in any form before 1848 was seen by many as a distant dream and by many more as an undesirable change. Austrian influence within Italy was huge; Austrians directly governed three states and controlled many others. The Vienna treaty in 1815 had established Austrian control of many of the states. The drive for restoration of 'legitimate' monarchs started by the French had resulted in all of the states taking back their monarchs or their monarch's descendants. Many of these dismissed many of the economic, judicial and constitutional reforms introduced by the previous French rulers and imposed extremely strict, absolutist and reactionary measures. ...read more.


There was no unified voice from the thinkers that the population could unite under and crucially no leadership. The academics were "too intellectual, too idealist and too impractical to be a real basis for revolution." Italy had a strong history of secret organisations many of which were set up in the period of French rule, the most famous and largest of which was the Carbonari. These organisations simply believed that the French occupiers had been replaced by the Austrians and through a series of actions they should try and drive these out. The Secret societies membership soared during the periods of revolution but as a rule membership was restricted to the middle classes and the upper landed classes. The Carbonari and other organisations used their power to try and force minor concessions such as the introduction of constitutions. The Secret societies, although a force to be reckoned with, were disjointed and few within their ranks saw unification as the primary objective of their cause. The secret societies therefore did not increase the likeliness of Italian unification up to 1848. In the period before 1848 there was little inclusion of the huge majority of the middle classes. They were effectively banned from the secret societies; the nationalistic literature of Mazzini and the like were beyond most intellectuals let alone the uneducated working classes. ...read more.


He was a dithery man who changed his mind frequently. He flirted with revolutionaries and when the present king abdicates and the first in line dies before crowning he takes the crown. Although an outward liberal before he was crowned he granted few concessions, such as a constitution, once in power and abandoned his liberal beliefs. The fact that Nationalists were pinning their hopes on a figure that historians have proven was weak willed, of dubious moral disposition and changed his mind so habitually it was difficult to keep informed of his current viewpoint highlights the lack of power and credibility the nationalist movement had before 1848. It must have seemed very unlikely that the Italian states would become unified in the period to 1848. Many obstacles faced the Italian Nationalists and little was going to be done under Metternich's nose. A mass revolution that encompassed all areas of society seemed a distant dream and the revolutions that preceded the 1848 date had highlighted both this and the lack of Italian wide cooperation. There was a clear lack of leadership whether it be Mazzini or Charles Albert and conflicting approaches to unification. The only possible leader was the Pope at the head of a mere federation. Most of all unification was simply unappealing to the masses of lower class population who really had few other interests apart from feeding their families. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Analyse the causes of the 1848 revolution in France.

    This specific incident led to enormous displeasure and discontent among the French people. They felt that in backing down Louis-Phillipe had acted dishonourably and had humiliated the country. Furthermore, the subsequent friendship that evolved with Britain (a situation which Louis-Phillipe felt would be favourable to his position in Europe)


    Suffrage encouraged peers to abstain from voting if they couldn't support the 1918 bill. Men * Liberal and Labour Parties were in favour of universal male suffrage. * A series of compromises including the retention of plural voting brought the Tories on board (the Tories also believed that military service was likely to influence working class males to vote Tory!).

  1. Constitutional Monarchies

    John Locke's Two Treatises of Government (1690) provided an attractive theoretical justification for it. Those who would not swear allegiance to the new monarchs were called nonjurors or Jacobites-Jacobus being Latin for James. The Jacobites were most numerous among the Roman Catholics in the Scottish Highlands and in Ireland.

  2. why did the 1848 revolutions fail.

    little support because they represented a large amount of the Italian population. Those who were involved felt no different as they were still disregarded. An example of this occurred in Sicily; after they declared itself as a separate republic the government took measures to prevent anymore chances especially in favour of the peasants.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work