• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How much did Hitler's foreign policy owe to his predecessors?

Extracts from this document...


How much did Hitler's foreign policy owe to his predecessors? Hitler claimed that his foreign policy was original; most of it having been written down in the also 'original' Mein Kampf, which included a huge mix of ideological hatred, that had mainly been written before in some kind during the previous 50 years. So it was with foreign policy. Although some elements were new, they were mostly because Hitler's predecessors had not had a chance to deal with them; they were results of the outcome of the First World War. These included lebensraum and pan Germanism, along with the desire to smash Communism and the idea of a racial war, including the destruction of the Jewish race worldwide. However, the most important idea was to crush the treaty of Versailles, something which Bismarck could not have envisaged, as he was dead before the war even started. However, Stresemann was interested in totally revising Versailles, although not going so far as ripping it up. There are also several ambiguous points, which featured before in German policy, but to which Hitler added a little of his own personal flavour. For example, the desire to expand into Russia was clear before even the war, and shown with the humiliating treaty of Brest-Litovsk, but no-one envisaged that Hitler would then try to use the Russians after annexing them as a slave labour force. ...read more.


However, although Stresemann had some different policies, this was due to pressure, for he was a right wing fish in a socialist sea. Despite his leanings, though, he was never concerned with racial ideology which so motivated Hitler's conduct. The only man around in the Weimar Republic who had the same leanings as Hitler, was Ludendorff, (who later joined the Nazis) who believed that establishing a large German area in the east at the expense of Russia would give Germany a large hegemonial position in Europe and beyond, from which position Germany would be able to fight a war self-sufficiently, called autarky. However, Stresemann believed Germany had to remain a trading nation and part of the international economic system. After the defeat of 1918, he became more of a realist, with a sharp sense of what could be done within the realm of practical politics. Although hating Versailles, he came to realise Germany could not destroy it by force, (Hitler's aim) but only by collaborating with the Western powers in gradually modifying it. He decided to play Germany's strongest card, her economic importance, should be played in cooperation with the international community, rather than in defiance of it, as some nationalists argued. After his period as chancellor, he remained as foreign minister until his death, deciding to advance by finesse rather than by force. ...read more.


This aroused concern with many of the generals, who tried to warn the British government, but they would not listen. This new aggression was shown by the fact that Hitler was in fact very angry after the Munich conference, for he would have to control himself somewhat until he had chance to strike. He also felt things were rising to a head where a large war would start, and in reality, he would have preferred a 'little war.' The fact that he was willing to make deals with anyone also helped his cause, for the signing of the Nazi-soviet pact was of vital importance. Hitler had been helped by the fact that Chamberlain had done everything possible to keep Stalin away from the negotiating table, for he wanted Britain to be the major mediator in European affairs. Therefore, although none of his predecessors' aims were criminal, Hitler did indeed borrow a great deal from them, even Stresemann to an extent. He was helped by the fact that hardly anyone knew that Hitler was indeed serious about his racial policies or the extent he would go to carry them out. In fact, it has been said, that once Hitler was fairly sure that he had lost the military war, he put all his efforts into winning the racial war. Despite the fact that some policies were new, these were mainly because of events that were recent, and so, Hitler, in terms of foreign policy, could definitely be described as a plagiarist. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * The burden of taxation was again placed on the collective farms and procurement levels of grain and livestock were increased by 50%. * Strict state control over agricultural affairs can be seen in Stalin's 'plan for the transformation of nature' introduced by decree in October 1948.

  2. "The most important aim of foreign policy 1933-1936 was to overthrow the terms of ...

    On the 25th of November 1936, the Anti-Comintern Pact was signed by Japan at first and later joined by Mussolini's Italy in November 1937 which meant that the axis was going as far as Tokyo. They all had the same goal that being communism and the fight against it as all 3 nations were very much against it spreading.

  1. Hitlers Germany

    However, the Reichstag had the right to revoke these emergency measures. Because of the imprecision of Article 48's wording, it was left to the Reich president himself to determine when a threat to law and order existed. This power had been invoked by the first Weimar president, Friedrich Ebert, to defend the republic against armed attacks.

  2. To what extent was Bismarck in control of the direction Germany's Foreign Policy took ...

    This suggests that a conflict may never have actually erupted, since Germany was the most powerful state in Europe, it would also be the deciding force in any European war. Going to war against it would be foolish unless the opposing coalition had one more great power than the coalition, which was supported by Germany.

  1. 'At Munich Hitler gained what he wanted and achieved conquest without firing a shot' ...

    be able to capitalise on the opportunity when the time was favourable to him. Bullock feels that capitalising when the time was favourable meant when Hitler's one clear objective could be achieved, 9 'the destruction of the Czechoslovak state'. Bullock expresses that this one clear aim was to be reached

  2. Was Chamberlain's policy of appeasement the best policy to deal with Hitler in 1938?

    France was engrossed in a self-fulfilling practice of defending the Maginot line, and would be of little help. It can only be described as an historical irony that France fell quicker with great strategical defence in 1939 than it did without in 1914.

  1. The Treaty of Versailles: Prelude to WWII

    Woodrow Wilson's League of Nations was created, but Germany was not invited to join. Before Germany had signed the Treaty of Versailles, she had read Wilson's published Fourteen Points, which had misled her into thinking she would be promised self-determination.

  2. AS Level Edexcel History Spain 1931-33 Revision Notes

    * Alfonso was closely connected to the Church. He claimed he was ?ready to shed his own blood for the Church.? * The king gave his support to General Primo de Rivera, who overthrew the government in 1923 and instituted a dictatorship which lasted until 1930.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work