• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How much did Hitler's foreign policy owe to his predecessors?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How much did Hitler's foreign policy owe to his predecessors? Hitler claimed that his foreign policy was original; most of it having been written down in the also 'original' Mein Kampf, which included a huge mix of ideological hatred, that had mainly been written before in some kind during the previous 50 years. So it was with foreign policy. Although some elements were new, they were mostly because Hitler's predecessors had not had a chance to deal with them; they were results of the outcome of the First World War. These included lebensraum and pan Germanism, along with the desire to smash Communism and the idea of a racial war, including the destruction of the Jewish race worldwide. However, the most important idea was to crush the treaty of Versailles, something which Bismarck could not have envisaged, as he was dead before the war even started. However, Stresemann was interested in totally revising Versailles, although not going so far as ripping it up. There are also several ambiguous points, which featured before in German policy, but to which Hitler added a little of his own personal flavour. For example, the desire to expand into Russia was clear before even the war, and shown with the humiliating treaty of Brest-Litovsk, but no-one envisaged that Hitler would then try to use the Russians after annexing them as a slave labour force. ...read more.

Middle

However, although Stresemann had some different policies, this was due to pressure, for he was a right wing fish in a socialist sea. Despite his leanings, though, he was never concerned with racial ideology which so motivated Hitler's conduct. The only man around in the Weimar Republic who had the same leanings as Hitler, was Ludendorff, (who later joined the Nazis) who believed that establishing a large German area in the east at the expense of Russia would give Germany a large hegemonial position in Europe and beyond, from which position Germany would be able to fight a war self-sufficiently, called autarky. However, Stresemann believed Germany had to remain a trading nation and part of the international economic system. After the defeat of 1918, he became more of a realist, with a sharp sense of what could be done within the realm of practical politics. Although hating Versailles, he came to realise Germany could not destroy it by force, (Hitler's aim) but only by collaborating with the Western powers in gradually modifying it. He decided to play Germany's strongest card, her economic importance, should be played in cooperation with the international community, rather than in defiance of it, as some nationalists argued. After his period as chancellor, he remained as foreign minister until his death, deciding to advance by finesse rather than by force. ...read more.

Conclusion

This aroused concern with many of the generals, who tried to warn the British government, but they would not listen. This new aggression was shown by the fact that Hitler was in fact very angry after the Munich conference, for he would have to control himself somewhat until he had chance to strike. He also felt things were rising to a head where a large war would start, and in reality, he would have preferred a 'little war.' The fact that he was willing to make deals with anyone also helped his cause, for the signing of the Nazi-soviet pact was of vital importance. Hitler had been helped by the fact that Chamberlain had done everything possible to keep Stalin away from the negotiating table, for he wanted Britain to be the major mediator in European affairs. Therefore, although none of his predecessors' aims were criminal, Hitler did indeed borrow a great deal from them, even Stresemann to an extent. He was helped by the fact that hardly anyone knew that Hitler was indeed serious about his racial policies or the extent he would go to carry them out. In fact, it has been said, that once Hitler was fairly sure that he had lost the military war, he put all his efforts into winning the racial war. Despite the fact that some policies were new, these were mainly because of events that were recent, and so, Hitler, in terms of foreign policy, could definitely be described as a plagiarist. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * Based on the ideas of the dubious character Trofim Lysenko, it resulted in the planting of 1.5 million hectares of trees in by 1951. * Many of the trees died as they were planted in unsuitably dry areas. The planting of trees did not help to increase crop yields

  2. Hitlers Germany

    Political Maneuvering Since the unsuccessful Beer Hall Putsch, Hitler had pursued a legal strategy of working within the system to achieve power. The campaigns of 1930 to 1932, in which the Nazis sought power through victories at the ballot box, reflected this strategy.

  1. To what extent was Bismarck in control of the direction Germany's Foreign Policy took ...

    Hereafter Bismarck reveals his ignorance of world affairs. Moreover Taylor writes, "the days of European upheaval were over; they would not come again until one of the powers felt itself strong enough to challenge the balance which had been established at the congress of Berlin."

  2. "The most important aim of foreign policy 1933-1936 was to overthrow the terms of ...

    It can be argued that the democracies did this in order to avoid further problems and most notably to avoid another war. His actions paved the way of the beginning to an end of the regulations set by the TOV.: Not very long after this, the Rome-Berlin Axis (this happened

  1. The Treaty of Versailles: Prelude to WWII

    She later found out that many Germans were now under foreign rule, as seen in the example of the Sudetenland which was given to Czechoslovakia despite its vast German population. Later on, this German displacement would give Hitler reason to invade countries 'in search of self-determination'.

  2. 'PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS OUTWEIGHED IDEOLOGY IN FOREIGN POLICY' IN RELATION TO GERMANY IN THE YEARS ...

    His generals cautioned Hitler that such a move would provoke an attack. Hitler judged the Anglo-French response correctly. The British and French took no action. The British sat back. January 1935 British government declared that Rhineland 'wasn't vital'. Hitler's 'gamble' had paid off.

  1. Did the policy of appeasement go to any great lengths toward stopping the outbreak ...

    This source clearly states that the policy of non-intervention was utterly a disgrace, European powers should have intervened and overthrown the Fascist dictators. By doing so in this country would have sent a message that fascism would strongly be opposed in their countries.

  2. AS Level Edexcel History Spain 1931-33 Revision Notes

    * Socialists won 115 seats and became the largest party in the Cortes. * Right-wing parties had lost massive amounts of seats. Early Constitutional Reforms Effect on the people Army He announced all officers would be allowed to transfer to reserve, at full pay (meaning retirement effectively).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work