• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How 'radical' was the 'Glorious Revolution'?

Extracts from this document...


HOW 'RADICAL' WAS THE 'GLORIOUS REVOLUTION?' The Glorious Revolution of 1688 was not radical in the changing sense of revolution, but it was a revolution to help maintain the traditional past. But it was never meant to be it was a revolution to get back to the past. James II's arrogant miscalculations, such as his dissolving of a parliament who did not approve of his policies, and his abandonment of traditions (his catholic fervour) cost him virtually all powerful support he had, his alienated Protestant nobility feared for their religion, their property and their position in the establishment and so plotted to overthrow the Stuart king and replace him with a William of Orange, who could be trusted to keep what they so treasured safe. James' supposed 'abdication' of the throne meant that Parliament were now in a position to keep their own political and religious interests from the threat of future unpredictable monarchs James II succeeded the throne from his brother Charles in 1685, shortly after he called a general election that resulted in a Tory government, "who could usually be relied upon to protect and advance the interests of the monarchy " Despite James' personal belief in Catholicism he stated that he would endeavour to defend and support the Church of England, this was a relief to his nominally Anglican support base. ...read more.


William of Orange, Stadtholder of Holland was the most renowned defender of the Protestant faith in Europe , he was called upon in a radical move by the 'Immortal Seven' to invade England and secure Mary's place as next monarch of England. This conspiracy was indeed a radical one, to actively ask for a foreign power to 'invade' and remove the king was extreme. However there is some debate amongst historians on how many and who amongst the nobility was willing to stand against the king, Professor Kenyon maintains "there importance has been greatly inflated" However a source from the time, an estimate from William's Dutch intelligence in May 1687 indicated that over half of the U.Ks' nobility opposed James' policies, obviously the risk to a member of the nobility for being openly anti-James were huge, owning vast amounts of wealth (especially inherited) and holding a very powerful position of office would of all been lost if one was convicted of treason had William failed to establish himself, but that did not mean they lacked revolutionary sympathies The want of the nobility to replace James with a quasi-invasion from William Orange was itself extremely radical, the nobility knew of the James' close friendship with King Louis XIV who incedently was enemies with William even to the extent of offering French naval ships in a possible struggle with William, made this whole operation extremely precarious and very risky. ...read more.


One also has to mention that the period after William's accession to the throne the slight shift in power from the Executive king to the legislative Houses of Parliament, this has been argued that it was not the intention of Westminster to plan this increase in their stature but more of a bi-product of the constitutional mess that was getting William of Orange and Mary into monarchy and getting the country to 'accept' the Revolution. Words: 1501 Frank O'Gorman "The Long Eighteenth Century" (Oxford University Press, 1997) Pg29 M. Ashley 'The Glorious Revolution of 1688' 1966 Pg57 Betty Kemp "King and Commons" 1959 pg25 Frank O'Gorman "The Long Eighteenth Century" 1997 Pg 30 Frank O'Gorman "The Long Eighteenth Century" 1997 Pg30 Gregory Stevenson 'Britain in the Eighteenth Century' 2000, pg4 Frank O'Gorman "The Long Eighteenth Century" 1997 pg30 Frank O'Gorman "The Long Eighteenth Century" 1997 pg30 M. Ashley 'The Glorious Revolution of 1688' 1966 pg 139 M. Ashley 'The Glorious Revolution of 1688' 1966 p161 M. Ashley 'The Glorious Revolution of 1688' 1966 p160 M. Ashley 'The Glorious Revolution of 1688' 1966 pg 135 Frank O'Gorman "The Long Eighteenth Century" 1997 pg31 Frank O'Gorman "The Long Eighteenth Century" 1997 pg32 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Resistance to slavery.

    the Spanish commander, Yasis, used slaves to defend the colony from the British invaders. These slaves gained their freedom when the Spanish lost the war and Jamaica became an English colony. The slaves escaped in the mountainous interior of Jamaica where they established sugar plantations and some slaves escaped to join the original maroons.

  2. The Portrait of a Lady. Discuss James representations of 'places' for women in this ...

    Daisy is watched and observed as a function of Winterbourne's experience. Before the potential meaning of the feminine as a sign can be used and directed by the female herself, as a function of her experience, she must comprehend the process of watching and manipulation that is imposed on her.

  1. How was Isabella able to secure her succession to the Castilian throne in 1469-1479?

    the settlements of Castile and had more bearing on her overall conquest. The support of towns and cities was always paramount in Isabella's aspiration, but her change of policy to deal mainly with winning them over was accelerated by the threat of war with Portugal and France.

  2. How united was Britain in 1688?

    Divisions over other issues must also have existed, particular in matters of purpose. The fact that a large section of the British nobility were prepared to support and tolerate a foreign monarch rather than their own proves that the constitutional divide between James and the nobles1 could not have been the sole cause of their disunity.

  1. Industrial Revolution

    the physical constitution of the population and began a permanent migration away from the countryside to the towns as a result of industry gradually usurping agriculture as the lifeblood of the nation. Liverpool, for example, was seventh in the list of European capital cities by 1850 with Manchester ninth.

  2. The changing position of women and the suffrage question. Revision notes

    The Conservative Party Reaction * The Conservative party, accepting that female enfranchisement was now inevitable, appreciated the advantages of limiting the franchise to the over 30s. (Change in order to conserve).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work