• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How reliable are the sources B & H in providing an objective eyewitness of the dropping of the atomic bomb?

Extracts from this document...


How reliable are the sources B & H in providing an objective eyewitness of the dropping of the atomic bomb? On the morning of August 6th 1945 the world witnessed the great and terrible power of a nuclear weapon as the American B-29 Bomber; the Enola Gay dropped the world's first Atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. The bomb exploded with a force of 13 kilotons of TNT and killed & injured 129,558 people and left another 176,987 people homeless, (approximately 88% of the city's population.) The blast flattened 10 km2 of the city (about 60 %.) Many of the individuals that were protected from the blast succumbed later to the effects of nuclear radiation. Three days later another nuclear weapon was dropped on the city of Nagasaki with similar effects. ...read more.


However the source does not contain much factual information and is instead plentiful in political spin and sounds like it could have been penned by a White House speechwriter: "...tempered with hope that this terrible weapon...may...prevent further war." We cannot even be sure this 'letter' was actually written by a man for his son, assuming it was though, it probably and accurately reflects the mood and opinion of any optimistic American at the time. It may be overly cynical and sceptical to believe the letter was intended for publication, it was probably written, as it claims it was, by a US Airman. The man's tone is calm and I don't think he would lie to his own son. ...read more.


This excerpt is mostly a factual account of the conditions on the ground and the latter section is of the piece describes how he personally felt on the day. It is not propaganda and there would be no point in lying about how he felt anyway. Even after 42 years, I do not believe that he would have forgotten his emotions on such a significant day, the purpose of the piece is to inform and describe and I would take what is said as true. I am of the opinion that both sources are reliable but more so source H. source H was to inform and describe the events to people, largely, in the generation after the bombing, source B was to influence contemporary peoples' opinion and it seems to be less believable. Andrew Lavery S1F Page 1 June 2003 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did hitler bomb british cities?

    This meant that is was big enough for two adults and two children to sleep in, even if it wasn't very comfortable. 500,000 Morrison's had been distributed by the end of 1941, with an outbreak of war. During the war a further 2.1 million were erected.

  2. atomic bomb

    Some historians have debated whether the Americans knew the full scale horror of the bomb when they made the inauspicious decision to deploy it. Truman had no knowledge of the bomb until the death of Roosevelt and his subsequent promotion to presidency.

  1. Dropping of the Atomic Bomb

    they had lost 1000's of lives because the Japanese fought more ferociously as the US neared Japan. The US also expected more lives to be lost if they continued to fight and did not drop the bombs. 3. I think the dropping of the bombs can be morally and militarily

  2. How useful is source B as evidence to the historian writing about the atomic ...

    How is the reaction to the dropping of the first atomic bomb represented in source F? Why was it represented in this way? (ANALYSIS, REPRESENTATION/INTERPRETATION, RELIABILITY) Source F is photograph taken after the dropping of the first atomic bomb on Hiroshima.

  1. The Atomic Bomb in World War II.

    "Both scientist and publicists were in fact powerful instruments inflaming popular hatred against the democratic countries and in regimenting the people into blindly supporting the war of aggrandizement." (p.100) This resolve would only have been strengthened had American and Russian forces tried to invade Japan.

  2. "Reasons for and against the dropping of the Atomic Bomb".

    But, the affects that was made by the bomb was massive. The cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki was destroyed in matters of seconds! Many died instantly and others who didn't died from radiation sickness and until today there are still deformed child and cancer because of this bomb.

  1. Truman and the Atomic Bomb - Sources Questions

    In this they re saying 'critics' which is a skate goat for C. Cuplin perhaps as he may not have wanted to write that himself. Source D also has some interesting facts which are quite true which could be very useful to a historian so that they can see the

  2. Evidence and Source Questions on Atomic raids on Hiroshima and Nagasaki 1945

    The leaflet, however, is very one sided and one must remember this when analysing it. It fails to mention some key aspects of the situation. For example, it fails to explain the other options America had before dropping the second bomb, such as a penetration of the country with troops, or even conventional bombing which had been effective in Tokyo.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work