How Secure was Henry VII?

Authors Avatar

How Secure was Henry VII?

9/26/04

A.M.D.G

Will Hanrahan

I think Henry was fairly insecure regarding the throne, in this essay I shall back this up referring to his relations with the Yorkists, pretenders, rebellions, the nobility, finance and his succession.

Henry had bad relations with the Yorkists, after defeating Richard III at the battle of Bosworth in 1485 he became king by right of conquest and therefore all the Yorkists would be against him for killing their king.

Henry descended from Edward III’s son, John of Gaunt, but only through his mistress Katherine Swynford, the Lancastrian Henry was aware that his right to the throne by descent was not to strong, and there were at least a dozen others with a better claim. Because of this fact many resented him and especially the Yorkists, Through the Acts of Attainder those Yorkists who fought against Henry were traitors and he could legally take their land and possessions, he used this way to remove many Yorkists from power to solve the problem of the large amount of ‘over mighty subjects’.

There were a few early threats from Yorkists during Henry VII’s reign. John de la pole was the nominated heir to the throne and therefore obviously wouldn’t have liked Henry’s actions; however he was put on the council by Henry as he was seen as a good member to have after swearing loyalty to the king, but later died fighting against Henry in the battle of East Stoke. In order to patch relations up between the two houses Henry cleverly decided to unite the house’s together, and with this Henry hopefully thought he may be able to avoid another war of the roses which could lead to his usurpation so in January 1486 he married Elizabeth of York, Edward VI’s daughter to unite the houses of York and Lancaster. This seemed to patch relationships up between the houses although some bore a grudge all through his reign like the De la pole family. Therefore he did try to reduce the threat from the Yorkists, but sparks still remained.

During Henrys reign there were two great pretenders, the first was Lambert Simnel, he was an imposter to the English throne, he met Richard Symonds who trained him to impersonate Richard, Duke of York, younger son of Edward IV, but the plan was changed and Simnel was taken to Ireland, claiming that he was Edward, Earl of Warwick, which would have given him a strong claim to the throne.

A number of Yorkists supported him, many knowing this was only a fake just so that they could get back into Yorkists rule, in May 1487 Simnel and his supporters, led by John de la Pole crossed to England and were defeated by Henrys forces. Margaret of Burgundy also supported Simnel as she was brother of Richard III and wanted to see the Lancastrians defeated. When Simnel was caught he was pardoned, which suggested he was just a puppet in the hands of the Yorkists.

Join now!

He was never a real threat to Henry and the events lasted less than one year and Simnel never had much evidence he was real and the rebel support he gained was easily defeated by Henry.

However the second pretender to the throne was more of a threat, his name was Perkin Warbeck and was persuaded by the Yorkist party to persuade Richard, Duke of York, the younger brother of Edward V.

His claim was more serious as he had backing from some big names including Maximillian I, James IV of Scotland and Margaret of Burgundy.

He went to Scotland ...

This is a preview of the whole essay