• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How serious was the opposition to the Henrican Reformation?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How serious was the opposition to the Henrican Reformation? The English reformation is widely discussed amongst historians; it was a process that saw the removal of the longstanding Papal influence and the beginnings of a new English Church. The reformation was believed to be a quick process, imposed upon the country from above. The decrees, acts and events of the reformation forced drastic changes upon both the English clergy, masses and the Papacy. These changes were unpopular and discontent was widespread. In spite of such feelings the reformation experienced little delay and monarchical power over the English Church continued to increase. That is not to say there was no opposition to the reformation, for it was rife and potentially serious. The opposition came from both the upper and lower classes, from the monks and nuns and from foreign European powers. This opposition however, was cleverly minimised from the outset, Cromwell's master plan ensured court opposition was minimal and new acts, oaths and decrees prevented groups and individuals from publicly voicing their dissatisfaction. Those who continued to counter such policies were ruthlessly and swiftly dealt with, often by execution, and used as examples to discourage others. ...read more.

Middle

It was the act of Succession that was met within court with fierce opposition. The act meant that it was to be made treason if any person denied that Henry was the Supreme head of the English Church and said or wrote anything against his present marriage or his lawful heirs. This act also denounced the power of the Pope, undoubtedly worsening the already fragile relationship between the English monarch and the Papacy. 'There was never such a striking at the passage of any act in the lower house' ( J. Guy 1988). Notwithstanding the resistance of the Commons the act passed with little delay. The pressure from above was immense, Parliament at this time were given more freedom and possessed more power. In addition Cromwell, Henry's chief minister had made it virtually impossible for concerted opposition to form. The opposition was eliminated before they acted as a focus for wider discontent. It is evident that Cromwell had successful managed to minimize opposition from the small isolated groups within court. There were however individuals who persistently angered the King and his minister. It was Henry's divorce, the Act of Supremacy and the break with Rome that imposed huge changes on English society and angered individuals. ...read more.

Conclusion

It is evident that opposition to the Henrican reformation was potentially serious. This is by virtue of the facts that potentially the king could have faced a battle on home soil against the rebels of the pilgrimage of grace that was by far the largest army. In addition court factions were working relentlessly to undermine monarchical authority and were continuing to gain support. Such opposition was also given further momentum by individuals such as More, Fisher and Barton who created effective propaganda for the Queen's cause. Although the opposition was potentially serious it mounted to very little. Henry and Cromwell ensured that these small isolated pockets of discontent both inside and outside of court were eliminated and that persistent defiant individuals were executed. In addition the Pilgrimage of Grace amounted to nothing as the rebels did not wish to battle, in addition the King's promise to offer pardons and restore some monasteries appealed to the rebels. It can therefore be concluded that although the opposition to the Henrican reformation was rife it posed little threat to Henry thanks to the quick response and actions of Cromwell who pinned down opposition in its early stages. Becky Grevitt ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How serious a threat did the Puritans pose to Elizabeth I and her Church?

    4 star(s)

    and 'at any time and in any country such an organisation would be formidable. In Elizabethan England it was a menace to the established order of church and state.' and Warren agrees that 'a system of this type left little or no place for the Supreme Governorship'.

  2. 'Without the Divorce Crisis, there would not have been a Henrician Reformation.' Discuss.

    Many were improving education. They argue that even if he felt they were corrupt and neglecting their duties, he would have taken more care in appointing the than completely breaking with Rome and papacy problems. Therefore it must have been other causes that led to the reformation.

  1. Anne Boleyn - A queen who inspired a revolution.

    The foundations of Anne's campaign, were by this time, Sinking slowly. The marriage between Anne and Henry began to witness disturbance after only two years. Anne, despite giving birth to a healthy girl, Elizabeth, failed to deliver a son and so Henry's darkest fears were once again awakened resulting in a quick decline in their relationship.

  2. How do the poets in 'Charlotte O'Neils song' and 'Nothing Changed' show their feelings ...

    Hope this helps. Submitted by: David Tutty, (Age 16) English > Q. How do the poets in 'Charlotte O'Neils song' and 'Nothing Changed' show their feelings about prejudice and inequality ? In 'Charlotte O'Neil's Song' the poet describes all the differences in lifestyle between the rich and the servants.

  1. Was the Henrician Reformation inevitable?

    great deal of evidence suggesting that the reformation was an accident and that Henry's initial impatience for his first divorce led him to cut the first strings with Rome. Henry's first wife, Catherine of Aragon, refused to co-operate and at no point would she agree to a divorce.

  2. What was the Edwardian Reformation and how successful was it?

    The title of the service, however still included 'commonly called the mass' the First Prayer Book was a work of compromise. Cranmer stipulated that one of the reasons for this was 'lest the people, not having yet learned Christ, should be deterred by too extensive innovations from embracing his religion'

  1. To what extent was the Henrican Reformation imposed from 'above'?

    It could give Henry both the answers to his martial difficulties; offer England the chance of a male heir and a solution to the England's financial difficulties. Certainly parliament started to exercise its muscles, and following the pramenuire accusations against the clergy their 'Submission' was presented in parliament, which gave into the Kings demands to monopolise their legal authority.

  2. Was Anne Boleyn or Thomas Cromwell the more influential in bringing religious reform in ...

    particularly seeing as Henry was related to Anne by first degree of affinity (having had an affair with her sister), which was exactly the same relation as Catherine was to him when the dispensation was granted for their marriage! In 1528, the Pope sent Cardinal Campeggio to England to decide,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work