• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How significant a role did the British navy play in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic wars and the overall defeat of Napoleon.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How significant a role did the British navy play in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic wars and the overall defeat of Napoleon. look at essay bank for the introduction Between 1793 and 1815 one of history's most outstanding military minds waged war across Europe. Napoleon was perhaps one of France's greatest military leaders of all time and one of History's great characters. At his peak he controlled almost of all of mainland Europe as far as Moscow. Despite his indisputable genius Napoleon was critically flawed and suffered a crushing defeat at Waterloo. There are a number of factors responsible for the downfall of the French leader and I am going to look at the significance of the navy compared to other factors which contributed to the final defeat. Not only did the period 1793-1815 lead to the establishment of a virtually unchallengeable British maritime predominance in the narrow sense of the possession of a vastly superior fleet, backed by numerous dockyards and naval bases and by a massive merchant marine; but it also confirmed Britain's control in the colonial world and her lead in foreign trade During the first phases of the wars which were fought against revolutionary France and not Napoleon the navy was not prepared for war and consequently failed to offer support to the armies present in Europe, for example they failed to give gunnery support when York besieged Dunkirk. ...read more.

Middle

French and Spanish ships were smashed by superior gunnery and firepower from the navy. Some 14,000 French and Spanish sailors were lost, ten times the British casualties. The British fleet also captured 19 out of the 33 French ships. Trafalgar renewed European confidence in Great Britain and led to the formation of the 3rd coalition. The navy therefore played a significant role as this battle set the seal on British sea power and ended any chance Napoleon had of invading Britain. When one adds to these victories the many smaller ones, the frigate actions in distant waters, and the attacks upon such harbours as Copenhagen (1801 and 1807) and Aix Roads (1809), then it scarcely suprising that the Nelsonic period has been regarded as the high point of British naval history. It is perhaps a tribute to the strength of the Britain's Navy and economy, that Napoleon introduced the ambitious Continental System. Under the Berlin Decrees of 1806, all ports under French control were to reject British trade. Although initially British exports fell by 25%, the dominance of the Royal Navy meant that the blockade could never be fully implemented. Trading simply continued as Britain exported to Europe through Portugal, along the Baltic coast. This once again showed the significance of having a strong navy in terms of maintaining trade and therefore being able to keep the armies and navy fighting against Napoleon. ...read more.

Conclusion

This is true on a number of other occasions were Napoleon underestimated his opponents and at times ignored the advice given to him by his generals. His personal greatness and success on the battlefield may have led to his eventual defeat at Waterloo. When looking at significant factors for the defeat of Napoloen one cannot overlook the importance of the support of the great military powers of Europe. This was essential since Britain, with a population less than half that of France, lacked the manpower resources to clear the French out of Holland and Belgium. European help was also needed if Britain was to do what had never been done before - to crush France's resistance entirely and overthrow her government. She also needed European assistance to prevent France from renewing their maritime resources by plundering or dominating their maritime neighbours. Also since the French opponents of the Revolution were to weak to succeed on their own or with British backing alone, European help was needed if Britain was to do what had never been done before - to crush France's resistance entirely and overthrow her government. The coalitions were a significant reason for the defeat of Napoleon and the end of the wars. The coalition forces included:- Russia, Prussia, Great Britain, Sweden, Austria, Spain, Portugal and the German states. Although not all of the seven coalitions were a success they were all well financed and eventually weakened Napoleon enough to enable the seventh coalition which defeated him at Waterloo. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    * Napoleon would at this point order his own reserves to launch a surprise enveloping attack on the enemy's rear and/or flank. In the decisive French charges and relentless pursuit which followed, heavy casualties would be inflicted on the fleeing enemy.

  2. How far can the downfall of Napoleon be explained by the continuous opposition of ...

    The opposition of Britain can be seen as a long term cause of Napoleon's downfall, without directly forcing his defeat. The mere existence of Britain as a threat galled Napoleon throughout his regime; as early as 1803 he is quoted as having said "the English want war, but if they

  1. In the process of consolidating his position, Napoleons reforms, had by 1808, destroyed the ...

    Conversely, there was an element of equality in the Educational Reforms; the system was highly centralised and government-appointed teachers would all teach to a common syllabus from identical textbooks - lessons were all standardised and the students would be taught identical things in near identical ways.

  2. To what extent and why did the impact of Napoleonic rule vary outside France?

    Paris needed to be consulted over every move satellite states made and Napoleon personally oversaw the majority of decisions however petty. It could take weeks for a request to be approved and placed into action at the outer reaches of the Empire which severely reduced the level of efficiency when implementing many of Napoleon's wishes.

  1. How far did Napoleon Bonaparte maintain the revolutionary ideals of liberty and equality in ...

    In terms of liberty, Napoleon established the concordat - a treaty between the state and the Pope. This stated several things. One was that the state would pay the clergy a salary and make appointments to senior positions such as bishops and archbishops.

  2. "To what extent was French defeat at the battle of Waterloo due to Napoleons ...

    They all made terrible mistakes during the battle, and therefore it reflects badly on Napoleon in his choice of commanders. Ney ordered a mass, unsupported, cavalry charge on an enemy he thought to be retreating5. This proved fatal as Wellington formed his steadfast troops into squares and heavily defeated Ney's cavalry.

  1. Why did the Franco-Prussian war happen and why were the Prussians able to defeat ...

    Another cause of the Franco-Prussian war was Napoleon III's ambition. From his accession to power in 1853 he had aimed to make France strong again. Evidence toward this assumption is the secret deals over parts of Belgium, Luxembourg and the Rhineland, Napoleon had made these deals with Prussia in order

  2. To what extent was Napoleon's success in Europe to 1807 the consequences of his ...

    it was fairly tiny and was not as strong or quick as the French army. Even though the weaknesses of Napoleon's enemies were rather considerable before 1807, he would not have been able to profit from these weaknesses if it were not for his military genius and the strength of his army.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work