• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How significant was Chinas intervention in deciding the course and outcome of the Korean War?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How Significant was China?s intervention in deciding the course and outcome of the Civil War? China?s intervention in the Korean played a significant part in deciding the course and outcome of the Civil War in a variety of ways. Among the most significant of these factors are the role played by the Chinese ?volunteer? army in pushing the UN forces back to the 38th Parallel and then South Korea, which prolonged a conflict which was seemingly going to be won by the UN. Without this intervention, the stalemate that led to the eventual Armistice would never have happened. Also, if China hadn?t intervened, then General MacArthur may not have been sacked by Truman, as part of the reason for his sacking was his failure to prevent the advance of the PRC; this would have been academic if the PRC hadn?t intervened in the war. If China had not intervened, MacArthur could have still been in control of the army ( as Truman would have had less reason to dismiss him), and as a result the US could have held a more aggressive stance towards attacking mainland China, as this is what MacArthur wanted in order to end the conflict quickly. Chinese intervention also meant that the damage and cost to all sides increased, as well as the significant impact China had on the eventual peace terms. One of the main factors that demonstrate the significance of the Chinese intervention was the role played by the ?volunteer? Chinese army. ...read more.

Middle

In addition to this, MacArthur publicly spoke of his discontent at not being able to blockade and bomb industrial and military targets on mainland China and end the war quickly, despite Truman not wanting him to, which ultimately led to his dismissal. Although it could be argued that Truman was waiting for an excuse to fire the Republican MacArthur (not just because of his political side, but also due to his rumoured Presidential ambitions), and would have eventually found a way to even if China had not intervened in the Civil War, without the Chinese intervention and as a consequence the rash military and general decisions made by MacArthur, he would probably have retained his job for the time being, largely because of his popularity amongst both the public and the Republicans in Congress, but also because of what would have been a successful US intervention in Korea. As a result, assuming MacArthur had kept his job and China had not intervened, MacArthur would have been able to pursue his aggressive tactics in Korea, and probably have been successful quite soon after. Thus, the Chinese intervention had a hugely significant impact on the course and eventual outcome of the war, as without it, it was likely the war would have ended by Christmas 1950 in favour of the UN; rather than being prolonged and ending up in the stalemate which it eventually did. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Korean War totally cost the US 20 Billion Dollars, a value that may have been considerably less had China not intervened and not just prolonged the war, but also made it more difficult for the UNC. It also cost China 2.5 Billion Dollars. Also, almost a quarter of a million South Koreans were killed in action in the Civil War and over 50,000 US troops were also killed. Again, this value would have been lower if the Chinese intervention had not prolonged the course of the war. Overall, the Chinese intervention in the Korean Civil War played a very significant role in deciding both the course and the impact of the War. The most significant factor in their intervention was the 300,000 ?volunteer troops?, which lulled MacArthur?s forces into a false sense of security, before forcing them back to the 38th Parallel. This not only greatly affected the course of the War by prolonging it, but also the outcome; i.e. the intervention ultimately returned Korea to the position it was in at the start, rather than in favour of the ROK. They also unwittingly played a large role in the sacking of General MacArthur, who clearly underestimated them with his almost arrogantly offensive tactics. In addition to this, the role the Chinese intervention played in the peace negotiations was significant, as instead of the UN being able to impose a treaty on North Korea, the Communist forces of China and the North Korea were in a much stronger bargaining position. Rahul Ravi 12SRM ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

5 star(s)

This is an excellent response that considers the impact of Chinese intervention in great detail and analyses it confidently. It could be more balanced in places but the argument that Chinese intervention was decisive is a convincing one.

5 Stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 24/10/2014

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How important was foreign intervention in the unification of Italy by 1870?

    4 star(s)

    In 1859, the war was fought and Napoleon III honoured his words and supplied Piedmont with two hundred thousand men against the Austrians. However in the same year, Napoleon III came to terms with Austria (also known as the Villa Franca armistice)

  2. Creative Writing - War.

    In the eyes of my father, by helping my nation defeat the enemy, it would put things right. So I put my dreams of becoming a doctor aside, and decided to join the war effort. My mother was too frightened to come to the door, so the only goodbye I

  1. The factors that led to the downfall of Apartheid in South Africa

    These countries were friendly towards South Africa because they needed her resources through trade and the protection that the South African government offered. The Cold War was another vital factor that led to the demise of the apartheid government, the link between the Cold War and the downfall of Apartheid

  2. Why did the Central Powers lose the First World War?

    There were different types of gas attacks and they were always on the improve, they can kill, blind or maim the enemy. There were different ways to attack using gas, the armies can let it drift with the wind (which always had a chance of changing wind direction and affecting the attacker)

  1. The Thirty Years War was a war over religion rather than politics. Do you ...

    H.G Koenigsberger argues that the rebellion was 'resistance by a privileged group for both political and religious reasons to an aggressive, centralizing monarchy'5. The argument that fighting commenced due in part to the perceived increasing political power of Ferdinand II is supported by Bonny who argues that Ferdinand and his

  2. How did the Vietnam War Have an Impact on Canada

    Shields had deserted the US army in 1972 after serving for one year in Vietnam. When Shields travelled to the US in 2000, 28 years later, he was arrested and jailed in the state of Washington.7 The discrimination against US army deserters made by the Canadian Government was removed in May of 1969 under the Government of Pierre Trudeau.

  1. Why did Britain and France pursue a policy of appeasement? Was it successful?

    It can be said that by following appeasement Britain and France just extended the length of an inevitable war. However Britain was concerned about whether Russia could be trusted and was therefore reluctant to ally with the USSR. After seeing Japan invade China Britain was very concerned about her empire.

  2. In What Ways Did World War One Impact American Society?

    They used and ridiculed Wilson's hypocritical view of fighting for democracy but still denying the vote to half its citizens as a key argument. They also attempted to justify themselves by saying that 'inferior' races such as African American men had been given the right to vote.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work