• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How significant were the actions taken by Thomas Cromwell in strengthening royal authority in the short-term?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Sasha Groves Candidate Number: 1119 Centre Number: 15205 How significant were the actions taken by Thomas Cromwell in strengthening royal authority in the short-term? As chief minister to Henry VIII between 1533 and 1540, Thomas Cromwell ?laid [religious] foundations that did not crumble for centuries?[1], and as a result, permanently changed the course of English history. There is therefore no doubt that Cromwell played a significant role in the events which defined the 1530?s, although there is debate regarding whether it was the King or his Minister who orchestrated such changes.[2] This essay will assess the short-term significance of Cromwell?s actions, by considering the consequences up to twenty years after they were undertaken, and analyse the effect that they had on Henry?s royal authority in terms of the increase in his power as King. It will consider Cromwell?s involvement in religious policy in bringing the church under Royal control and dissolving the monasteries, and his role in moulding Henry?s government into an efficient administration and increasing the importance of statute law. Cromwell?s actions certainly strengthened Henry?s authority in the short-term by extending royal sovereignty, increasing the status of parliament and ensuring that religious changes were enforced without opposition. ...read more.

Middle

An extract from Cromwell?s Inspectors at Ramsey Monastery in 1535 makes it clear as to how the poor behaviour of a few monks could be used as a justification to dissolve the monasteries. It states that the ?dormitory is in a state of disrepair? and that the monks ?sometimes shoot arrows in the fields in unbecoming attire?.[19] Cromwell?s enquiry into the monasteries was perhaps intended to prove that the monasteries were corrupt and required reform. Therefore, one must be aware of the possible bias of this contemporary source since elements may be exaggerated in order to ?collect incriminating data that could be used to manipulate Parliament into authorising mandatory dissolution?[20]. An extract from the Dissolution of the Lesser Monasteries Act 1536 further emphasises this notion, suggesting that ?Manifest sin, vicious, carnal and abominable living, is daily used and committed?[21]. This extract is useful for providing an insight into why the monasteries were perhaps dissolved, although it is likely to be biased as Cromwell desired to suppress the monasteries and therefore it may not be wholly reliable since he intended to convince Henry. As evidence shows, Cromwell was of pivotal importance in the dissolution of the monasteries. ...read more.

Conclusion

[13] This allowed Lutheran principles to make their way into the Church and led to the birth of Puritanism. [14] Henry VIII?s Act of Supremacy (1534) ? original text. http://www.britainexpress.com/History/tudor/supremacy-henry-text.htm [15] Scarisbrick, (1968), pg 337 [16] Pollard, (1902), pg 255 [17]Cromwell was appointed as Vicegerent in Spirituals in January 1535. This meant that the power of the church was also passed to a layman (Cromwell) who exercised the extensive powers vested in the Supreme head to make bishops comply with the King?s will. [18] Henry VIII himself was not opposed to monasteries as such but his policy was anti-papal, whereby he saw monasteries as a foci of papal jurisdiction and resistance to the break with Rome. Cromwell on the other hand was anti-monastic and sought abolition on the grounds of superstition (monasteries, shrines, veneration of saints and images, pilgrimages, purgatory). [19] Source D, www.ecclesbourne.derbyshire.sch.uk/ecclesbourne/content/subsites/history/files/Year%2520Seven/The%2520Closing%2520of%2520the%2520Monasteries.doc [20] Quote by Guy, as found in Armstrong, (2008), pg 121 [21] Original text of the Act, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dissolution_of_the_Lesser_Monasteries_Act [22] Hayward, (2009), pg 254. [23] The royal household tended to breakdown when the King was not active and powerful. Bureaucratic institutions did not depend on the King?s personal efforts and functioned effectively regardless of what the monarch was like. [24] Elton, (1982), pg 238. [25] Elton, (2003), pg 232. [26] http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/cromwell_law_order.htm [27] Elton, (2003), pg 232. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Oliver Cromwell - Hero or Villain?

    They were very vulnerable. At this time, Cromwell used his army to repress the English people. He even turned the catholic people out of their houses, by putting the defendants to the sword. He told the Catholics, that they could "Go to hell, or cunuct."

  2. Millicent Fawcett's significance

    Between 1914 and 1918, approximately two million women replaced men in employment, thereby increasing the percentage of women in employment from 24% in July 1914 to 37% by November 1918. Due to women's involvement on the Home Front during the war, women gained a wider array of occupations as female

  1. To what extent was Henry's decision to break with Rome influenced by Thomas Cranmer ...

    However, as Wolsey's successor Cromwell would have realised the massive financial gains that could be had by tapping the Church's income and diverting even a small proportion of it to his personal coffers. Much in the same way the early dissolutions funded Wolsey's extravagance, Cromwell stood to gain financially from

  2. Was Charles I Trying to Establish Royal Absolutism during his Personal Rule?

    Also, only costal counties had to pay it. Charles altered the tax so that it would be paid annually and by inland counties. This was an enormous risk because there was no precedent for it in English history. Eventually, the scheme backfired to an extent in 1637 in the famous Ship Money Trial.

  1. Was the Henrician Reformation inevitable?

    The picture of a slow, steady decline into Nemesis is suspect12 " It is possible that what had happened, according to the historian Claire Cross, was not so much any change within the church as a rise in standards of lay society without it.

  2. Was Oliver Cromwell a hero or a villain?

    "As a soldier, he might be guilty of nepotism, favoring certain people and promoting common people, as many were on his side."-*11 The fact that he had many peasants on his side, unskilled in fighting, provokes the argument that it was numbers, not skill that won him the war.

  1. Why was Thomas Cromwell able to make such extensive reforms in Government, when Cardinal ...

    His appointment of only those men who were intelligent enough to deserve those positions built up its strength, as each of these men were more than able to hold their own if the need arose to defend their status. Historians agree that he did not work solely for his own

  2. Using all the sources and your own knowledge, assess to what extent the dissolution ...

    The Bible was published in English in 1539 and Henry sent a copy of this 'Great Bible' to every church parish in England. This was reflective of the Protestant belief of 'priesthood for all believers' as until then Bibles and services were in Latin which few people could understand.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work